Comparison of solutions Sample Clauses

Comparison of solutions. ‌ From the solution given by the real planning and the solver generated solution, the utilization of the vessels have been calculated and shown in Table 5.03. The utilization has been given in terms of the number of orders served by each vessel and also by the percentage of the total demand carried by each vessel. Vessels Utilization Number of orders served % tonnage of total demand Bulk vessel no 1 4 21.94 Bulk vessel no 2 4 21.53 Bulk vessel no 3 1 13.81 Bulk vessel no 4 1 5.28 Bulk vessel no 5 1 6.55 Bulk vessel no 6 2 22.75 Bulk vessel no 7 1 8.13 Total 14 100 Table 5.03(a): Utilization of vessels from real solution Vessels Utilization Number of orders served % tonnage of total demand Bulk vessel no 1 Bulk vessel no 6 9 5 49.62 50.38 Total 14 100 The utilization of vessels under the real plan has a maximum of 22.75% with two orders being served. This in actual sense may be considered as biased as bulk vessel 6 has a capacity which is twice that of bulk vessel 1. Bulk vessel 1 serves 4 orders serving 21.94% of the orders. The reduced fleet size in the solver generated solution gave a share of approximately 50% each to both bulk vessels used. Five orders were served by bulk vessel 6 and 9 orders by bulk vessel 1. The poor utilization of the vessels in the real plan is partly due to their use outside the Rogaland and Hordaland region. The vessels were put to use based on their availability within the period. The solution from the solver represents how vessels could be used to serve orders only within the region, and thus having a small fleet to serve orders. CHAPTER SIX‌
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Comparison of solutions. ‌ A summary of the fleet composition is presented in Table 6.21. In general, the fleet compositions from bulk vessels indicate that the number of bulk vessels corresponds to the number of barges to be used in the alternative vessel type. An analogy which could be used here is that the tugboats represent the engine part of the bulk vessel. Where there are a number of bulk vessels to serve a certain number of orders, the same number of barges is required but the same amount of orders can be served with a lower number of tugboats/engine. More orders are served daily by tugboats/barges which imply an increase in productivity. An increase in the productivity potentially leads to an increase in the revenue. Traditional bulk vessels Tugboats ad barges Fleet composition: 4 bulk vessels Capacities: 2500,2500, 2000, 2000 All orders served No additional orders possible Fleet composition: 3 tugboats 4 barges Capacities: 2500,2500, 2000, 2000 All orders served Additional orders possible Fleet composition: 2 bulk vessels Capacities: 2000, 2000 All orders served Additional orders possible Fleet composition (a): 1 tugboat 2 barges One order not served Fleet composition (b): 2 tugboat 2 barges All orders served Additional orders possible Capacities: 2000, 2000 Fleet composition: 1 bulk vessel Capacity: 3500 All orders served Additional orders possible Fleet composition: 1 tugboat 1 barge All orders served Additional orders possible Capacity: 3500 Fleet composition: 3 bulk vessel All orders served Additional orders possible Capacities: 3500, 2000, 2000 Fleet composition: 3 tugboat 3 barge All orders served Additional orders possible Capacities: 3500, 2000, 2000 number of orders(bulk vessel) number of orders(tugboat) 0 day 1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 day 6 Solving the same problem instances with tugboats/barges gave solutions different from the traditional bulk vessel. This is due to the flexibility in operating tugboats and barges. A lot of time is gained by eliminating the time spent for unloading. This time is invested into serving more orders. Consequently, more orders are served by tugboats and barges daily (Figure 6.1) and a smaller fleet is also used. Orders are also completed early in the planning horizon and also with a high order fulfilment rate. Figure 6.1: Graph showing the comparison of the number of orders served daily From this graph, we can see that 3 tugboats and 4 barges can serve more orders daily which is good for planning the activity in a week24. Comparin...
Sample 1

Related to Comparison of solutions

  • EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS 29.1 The Employer will evaluate and compare only the Bids determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with Clause 26. 29.2 In evaluating the Bids, the Employer will determine for each Bid the evaluated Bid Price by adjusting the Bid Price as follows: (a) Making any correction for errors pursuant to Clause 27; or (b) Making an appropriate adjustments for any other acceptable variations, deviations; and (c) Making appropriate adjustments to reflect discounts or other price modifications offered in accordance with Sub Clause 22.5. 29.3 The Employer reserves the right to accept or reject any variation, deviation, or alternative offer. Variations, deviations, and alternative offers and other factors which are in excess of the requirements of the Bidding documents or otherwise result in unsolicited benefits for the Employer shall not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.4 The estimated effect of the price adjustment conditions under Clause 47 of the Conditions of Contract, during the period of implementation of the Contract, will not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.5 If the Bid of the successful Bidder is seriously unbalanced in relation to the Engineer’s estimate of the cost of work to be performed under the contract, the Employer may require the Bidder to produce detailed price analyses for any or all items of the Bill of Quantities, to demonstrate the internal consistency of those prices with the construction methods and schedule proposed. After evaluation of the price analyses, the Employer may require that the amount of the performance security set forth in Clause 34 be increased at the expense of the successful Bidder to a level sufficient to protect the Employer against financial loss in the event of default of the successful Bidder under the Contract. 30. (Deleted)

  • Comparison of Tenders 34.1 The Procuring Entity shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 33.2 to determine the Tender that has the lowest evaluated cost. The comparison shall be on the basis of total cost (place of final destination) prices for all goods and all prices, plus cost of inland transportation and insurance to place of destination, for goods manufactured within the Kenya, together with prices for any required installation, training, commissioning and other services.

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • Rotation of Shifts Employees required to work rotating shifts (day, evening and night duty) shall be scheduled in such a way as to, as equitably as possible, assign the rotation equally. This does not preclude an Employee from being continuously assigned to an evening or night shift at the Employee’s request where such continuing assignment is acceptable to the Employer.

  • Combination of Shares If the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at any time after the date hereof is decreased by a combination of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, the per share Exercise Price shall be appropriately increased and the number of shares of Warrant Shares shall be appropriately decreased in proportion to such decrease in outstanding shares.

  • Technical and Organizational Measures The following sections define SAP’s current technical and organizational measures. SAP may change these at any time without notice so long as it maintains a comparable or better level of security. Individual measures may be replaced by new measures that serve the same purpose without diminishing the security level protecting Personal Data.

  • Room Changes No changes in room assignment will be based upon age, race, religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, and online profiles except as needed to provide a reasonable accommodation to residents with eligible disabilities registered with the College Office of Counseling and Disability Services. Room change may only be made with the written approval of College Housing and is dependent upon space availability, timing of the request, and grounds for transfer. Residents who receive approval for a room change may be charged a room change fee as shown on the College Housing website, which will be posted to Resident’s account. Room changes that are not authorized by College Housing will result in a fine as shown on the College Housing website, which will be posted to Resident’s account.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Business Changes Change in any material respect the nature of the business of the Borrower or its Subsidiaries as conducted on the Effective Date.

  • Aggregation of Stock All shares of Registrable Securities held or acquired by Affiliates shall be aggregated together for the purpose of determining the availability of any rights under this Agreement and such Affiliated persons may apportion such rights as among themselves in any manner they deem appropriate.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!