Compliance Demonstration Methods Sample Clauses

Compliance Demonstration Methods. (1) Each month the permittee shall calculate the total volatile organic compound emissions from the facility as follows: E = (1 ton/2000 lbs) x {[(U1 x W1 x C1 x G1) + (U2 x W2 x C2 x G2) + ... + (Un x Wn x Cn x Gn)] - [(S1 x P1) + (S2 x P2) + ... + (Sm x Pm)]} where: E is the monthly VOC emissions (tons/month); U is the monthly usage of each ink, coating, solvent, or other VOC containing material used during the month (gallons/month); W is the density of each ink, coating, solvent, or other VOC containing material used during the month (pounds/gallon) C is the VOC content of each ink, coating, solvent, or other VOC containing material used during the month expressed as a weight fraction (i.e. if a material is 25% VOC by weight C would be 0.25); n identifies each ink, coating, solvent or other VOC containing material used during the month; G is a multiplier for VOC containing materials for which the VOC is emitted at other than 100 percent of its content; S is the amount of each spent ink, coating, solvent or other VOC containing material recovered and shipped off site each month (gallons/month); P is the VOC content of each spent ink, coating, solvent or other VOC containing material recovered and shipped off site each month in pounds per gallon; m identifies each spent ink, coating, solvent or other VOC containing material recovered and shipped off site during the month. [s. NR 407.09(4)(a)1., Wis. Adm. Code]
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Compliance Demonstration Methods. (1) Each month the permittee shall calculate the total emissions of each hazardous air pollutant from the facility regulated by the Clean Air Act as follows:69 [s. NR 407.09(4)(a)1., Wis. Adm. Code] Ex = (1 ton/2000 lbs) x {[(U1 x W1 x H1 x F1) + (U2 x W2 x H2 x F2) + ... + (Un x Wn x Hn x Fn)] - [(S1 x I1) + (S2 x I2) + ... + (Sm x Im)]} where: Ex is the monthly emissions of each hazardous air pollutant regulated by the Clean Air Act (tons/month); x identifies each HAP emitted from the facility U is the monthly usage of each ink, coating, solvent, or other HAP containing material used during the month (gallons/month); W is the density of each ink, coating, solvent, or other HAP containing material used during the month (pounds/gallon) H is the HAP content of each ink, coating, solvent, or other HAP containing material used during the month expressed as a weight fraction (i.e. if a material is 25% HAP by weight H would be 0.25); F is a multiplier for HAP containing materials for which the HAP is emitted at other than 100% of its content. For those HAP containing materials for which the HAP is 100% emitted, F equals 1 and does not have to be specifically considered in the equation.; n identifies each ink, coating, solvent or other HAP containing material used during the month; S is the amount of each spent ink, coating, solvent or other HAP containing material recovered and shipped off site each month (gallons/month); I is the HAP content of each spent ink, coating, solvent or other HAP containing material recovered and shipped off site each month in pounds per gallon; m identifies each spent ink, coating, solvent or other HAP containing material recovered and shipped off site during the month.
Sample 1
Compliance Demonstration Methods. (1) The permittee shall only fire natural gas and/or propane in each non-electric drying oven and space heater at the facility.2 [ss. NR 407.09(1)(c)1.b., Wis. Adm. Code and 285.65(3) and 285.63(1)(a), Wis. Stats.]
Sample 1
Compliance Demonstration Methods. 2 Because the maximum theoretical emissions while firing these fuels are less than the allowable limit of 0.15 pounds per million Btu heat input, limiting the type of fuel used is adequate to demonstrate compliance with the particulate matter emission limit. Maximum theoretical particulate matter emissions were calculated using an emission factor of 7.6 pounds per million cubic feet of natural gas fired from AP-42, 5th edition, ch. 1.4. 3 This statement is sufficient because each non-electric drying oven is designed to only burn natural gas and/or propane.
Sample 1
Compliance Demonstration Methods. The compliance demonstration methods for the following emissions units were reviewed under the preliminary determinations for operation permit numbers 632009730-F01, 632009730-F03, and 632009730-F04 and under the preliminary determinations for construction permit numbers 05-MEC-314 and 06-MEC-044 and remain unchanged as a result of this renewal: Stack S03, Process P03 - 2 Lithographic Presses with Natural Gas/Propane Drying Ovens - Installed 1991 (PLO-05-H and PLO-07-H) Stack S08, Process P08 - 1 Roll Coater with Natural Gas/Propane Conveyor Oven - Installed 1991 (PCO-08-H) Stack S09, Process P09 - Six screening lines with 2 screening machines and two screening lines with 1 screening machine for a total 14 screening machines. Plus four additional backup screening machines for temporary replacement of the original 14 machines. Only 14 machines shall be operated at any one time. Process P09 includes 8 ovens. Six of these ovens fire natural gas or propane and have a total combined heat input rating of 7.9 mmBtus per hour. Two ovens are electric ovens. Installed 1991 and 2001. Modified 2005 and 2006. (Screening lines PSO-12-H, PSO-27-H, PSO-21-H, PSO- 18-H, PSO-26-H, PSO-23-H, PSO-H-31, PSO-H-30) Stack S36, Process P36 - Towel Dryer - Installed 1991 Stack S40, Process P40 - Screen Cleaning Machine - Installed 1998 Stack S14, Process P14 - Miscellaneous Facility Wide Cleanup Stack S50, Process P50 - Two Digital Printing Lines each with an IR Curing Oven - Installed 2001 Stack S60, Process P60 - Screening machine with a natural gas oven with attached UV curing unit. The heat input rating of the natural gas oven is 0.78 mmBtus per hour. Installed 2002 Please refer to the preliminary determinations for permit numbers 632009730-F01, 05-MEC- 314/632009730-F03, and 06-MEC-044/632009730-F04 for a description of the compliance demonstration methods for these emissions units. The following are the compliance demonstration methods for emissions units that are either new or changed as a result of this renewal: Space Heaters B10: To demonstrate compliance with particulate matter and visible emission limitations the permittee would be required to retain a statement that natural gas and propane are the only fuels available for combustion at the facility. This is an adequate compliance demonstration method because the maximum theoretical emissions while firing these fuels are less than the allowable particulate matter emission limit. Additionally, it is not expected that visi...
Sample 1
Compliance Demonstration Methods c. Record Keeping and Monitoring:
Sample 1
Compliance Demonstration Methods. (1) To demonstrate compliance with condition I.A.4.a.(1), the permittee shall calculate the total gallons of propane used at the facility, averaged over each 12 consecutive month period by dividing the total gallons of propane used during each consecutive 12 month period by 12. This calculation shall be performed within twenty calendar days of the end of each month for the previous 12 consecutive month period. [s. NR 407.09(4)(a)1., Wis. Adm. Code]
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Compliance Demonstration Methods. (1) * Each month the permittee shall calculate the total facility emissions of formaldehyde as follows: Eform = [(V1 x W1 x F1) + (V2 x W2 x F2) + ... + (Vn x Wn x Fn)] - [(R1 x G1) + (R2 x G2) + ... + (Rm x Gm)] where: Eform is the monthly emissions of formaldehyde (pounds/month); x identifies each HAP emitted from the facility V is the monthly usage of each ink, coating, solvent, and other material containing formaldehyde used during the month (gallons/month); W is the density of each ink, coating, solvent, or other material containing formaldehyde used during the month (pounds/gallon); F is the formaldehyde content of each ink, coating, solvent, or other material containing formaldehyde used during the month expressed as a weight fraction (i.e. if a material is 25% formaldehyde by weight F would be 0.25); n identifies each ink, coating, solvent or other material containing formaldehyde used during the month; R is the amount of each spent ink, coating, solvent or other material containing formaldehyde recovered each month to be shipped off site (lbs/month); G is the formaldehyde content of each spent ink, coating, solvent or other material containing formaldehyde recovered each month to be shipped off site expressed as a weight fraction (i.e. if a spent material is 25% formaldehyde by weight G would be 0.25); m identifies each spent ink, coating, solvent or other material containing formaldehyde recovered each month to be shipped off site during.
Sample 1
Compliance Demonstration Methods. (1) The compliance demonstration methods listed for particulate matter emissions in I.A.3.b.(1) through (13) shall also serve as compliance demonstration methods for the visible emissions limitations in I.A.6.a.(1) and (2). [s. NR 407.09(4), Wis. Adm. Code]
Sample 1

Related to Compliance Demonstration Methods

  • Child Abuse Reporting Requirement Grantee will:

  • Child Abuse Reporting Requirements A. Grantees shall comply with child abuse and neglect reporting requirements in Texas Family Code Chapter 261. This section is in addition to and does not supersede any other legal obligation of the Grantee to report child abuse.

  • Requirement to Utilize HUB Compliance Reporting System Pursuant to Texas Administrative Code, Title 34, Part 1, Sections 20.285(f) and 20.287(b), TFC administers monthly administration HSP-PAR compliance monitoring through its HUB Compliance Reporting System commonly known as B2G. PSP and PSP’s subcontractors/subconsultants shall submit required PAR information into the B2G system. Any delay in the timely submission of PAR information into the B2G system will be treated as an invoicing error subject to dispute under Texas Government Code Section 2251.042.

  • Compliance Reporting a. Provide reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Association of Securities Dealers and the States in which the Fund is registered.

  • Forecasting Requirements 19.5.1 The Parties shall exchange technical descriptions and forecasts of their Interconnection and traffic requirements in sufficient detail necessary to establish the Interconnections necessary for traffic completion to and from all Customers in their respective designated service areas.

  • Compliance Audit LEA shall have the right but shall be under no obligation to conduct audit(s), from time to time, of Provider’s records concerning its compliance obligations as set forth in this Article V. Provider shall make such records and other documents available to LEA upon request.

  • COMPLIANCE AND CERTIFICATION 25.1 Each Party shall comply at its own expense with all Applicable Laws that relate to that Party’s obligations to the other Party under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring or permitting either Party to contravene any mandatory requirement of Applicable Law.

  • Trunk Forecasting Requirements 14.2.1 Initial trunk forecast requirements. At least ninety (90) days before initiating interconnection in a LATA, Alltel shall provide Verizon a two (2)-year traffic forecast that complies with the Verizon Interconnection Trunking Forecast Guide, as revised from time to time. This initial traffic forecast will provide the amount of traffic to be delivered to and from Verizon over each of the Interconnection Trunk groups in the LATA over the next eight (8) quarters.

  • Compliance Report The Subservicer agrees that it shall permit, not more than once per year, the Servicer, the Issuer, the Indenture Trustee or the Indenture Administrator, as the Indenture Trustee’s designee, to conduct or have conducted a procedural audit regarding the Subservicer’s compliance with the requirements of the Higher Education Act or the terms of this Agreement. Such audits shall be at the expense of the Servicer.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Think 12 will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Think 12 must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non- designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Think 12 will be required to provide the results of the Think 12 test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.