Conducting a Process Review. Subject to subclause K3.3 the head of service must arrange for an application to be reviewed by an independent person (the reviewer) who may be: a suitably skilled person who was not involved in the original action; or a person chosen from a panel of providers. The independent reviewer will be provided with all relevant information and evidence that was available to the decision-maker in the making of the original decision. The reviewer will make an assessment whether relevant processes contained in this Agreement, the PSM Act and PSM Standards were followed, and to what extent. After reviewing the information and evidence provided under subclause K3.5, the independent reviewer will provide a report to the head of service, which either: confirms that the process was conducted in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, the PSM Act, and PSM Standards; or finds that there were deficiencies in the process; such findings will be supported by reasons and the report may include recommendations for how similar processes may be conducted in future. Section LRedeployment and Redundancy L1 -Definitions Excess officer means an officer who has been notified in writing by the head of service that he or she is excess to an ACTPS Directorate's requirements because: the officer is included in a class of officers employed in an ACTPS Directorate, which class comprises a greater number of officers than is necessary for the efficient and economical working of the Directorate; or the services of the officer cannot be effectively used because of technological or other changes in the work methods of the relevant Directorate or changes in the nature, extent or organisation of the functions of the relevant Directorate.
Conducting a Process Review. K3.4 Subject to subclause K3.3 the head of service must arrange for an application to be reviewed by an independent person (the reviewer) who may be:
