Cooperation in Prosecution Sample Clauses
Cooperation in Prosecution. Each Party shall provide the other Party all reasonable assistance and cooperation in the Patent prosecution efforts provided above in this Section 9.3, including providing any necessary powers of attorney and executing any other required documents or instruments for such prosecution.
Cooperation in Prosecution. Each Party shall provide the other Party all reasonable assistance and cooperation in the patent prosecution efforts provided above in Section 7.2, including providing any necessary powers of attorney and assignments of employees of the Parties and their Affiliates and sublicensees and Third Party contractors and executing any other required documents or instruments for such prosecution. All communications between the Parties relating to the preparation, filing, prosecution or maintenance of the Zymeworks Patent Rights and Joint Patent Rights, including copies of any draft or final documents or any communications received from or sent to patent offices or patenting authorities with respect to such Patent Rights, shall be considered Confidential Information, subject to Article 8. For clarity, all such communications regarding the Zymeworks Patent Rights shall be the Confidential Information of Zymeworks and all such communications regarding Joint Patent Rights shall be the Confidential Information of both Parties.
Cooperation in Prosecution. Each Party shall provide the other Party all reasonable assistance and cooperation in the Patent prosecution efforts provided above in this Section 7.3, including providing any necessary powers of attorney and executing any other required documents or instruments for such prosecution, as well as further actions as set forth below. Such assistance and cooperation shall include making a Party’s inventors and other scientific advisors reasonably available to assist the other Party’s prosecution efforts.
(i) The Parties shall respectively prepare, file, maintain and prosecute the MacroGenics Patents, the Provention Patents and the Joint Patents as set forth in this Section 7.3. As used herein, “prosecution” of such Patents shall include all communication and other interaction with any patent office or patent authority having jurisdiction over a patent application in connection with pre-grant proceedings.
(ii) All communications between the Parties relating to the preparation, filing, prosecution or maintenance of the MacroGenics Patents, the Provention Patents and the Joint Patents, including copies of any draft or final documents or any communications received from or sent to patent offices or patenting authorities with respect to such Patents, shall be considered Confidential Information of the Party Controlling the relevant Patent and subject to the confidentiality provisions of Article 8.
Cooperation in Prosecution. Each Party shall provide the other Party all reasonable assistance and cooperation in the efforts provided above in this Section 9.4, including providing any necessary powers of attorney and executing any other required documents or instruments for such efforts (without charge to the other Party).
Cooperation in Prosecution. Each Party shall provide the other Party all reasonable assistance and cooperation in the Patent prosecution efforts provided above in this Section 9.3, including providing any necessary powers of attorney and executing any other required documents or instruments for such prosecution, as well as further actions as set forth below.
(i) The Parties shall respectively prepare, file, maintain and prosecute the SGI Patent Rights, MPI Patent Rights and Joint Patents as set forth in this Section 9.3. As used herein, “prosecution” of such Patents shall include, without limitation, all communication and other interaction with any patent office or patent authority having jurisdiction over a patent application throughout the world in connection with pre- and post-grant proceedings.
(ii) All communications between the Parties relating to the preparation, filing, prosecution or maintenance of the SGI Patent Rights, MPI Patent Rights and Joint Patents, including copies of any draft or final documents or any communications received from or sent to patent offices or patenting authorities with respect to such Patents, shall be considered Confidential Information of both Parties (provided, however, that communications (if any) with respect to MPI Patent Rights shall be considered Confidential Information of MPI) and subject to the confidentiality provisions of Article 12.
(iii) Assignments in the Patents claiming Sole Inventions or Joint Inventions shall be effected as follows:
(1) employees or agents of MPI or its Affiliates that are properly named as inventors on any Patents claiming a Sole Invention or Joint Invention shall assign their interest in such Patents to MPI; and
(2) employees or agents of SGI or its Affiliates that are properly named as inventors on any Patents claiming a Sole Invention or Joint Invention shall assign their interest in such Patents to SGI.
Cooperation in Prosecution. Each Party shall provide the other Party all reasonable assistance and cooperation in the patent prosecution efforts provided above in Section 7.2, including providing any necessary powers of attorney and assignments of employees of the Parties and their Affiliates and sublicensees and Third Party contractors and executing any other required documents or instruments for such prosecution. All communications between the Parties relating to the preparation, filing, prosecution or maintenance of the Zymeworks Patent Rights, Celgene Patent Rights and Joint Patent Rights, including copies of any draft or final documents or any communications received from or sent to patent offices or patenting authorities with respect to such Patent Rights, shall be considered Confidential Information, subject to Article 8. For clarity, all such communications regarding the Zymeworks Patent Rights shall be the Confidential Information of Zymeworks, all such communications regarding the Celgene Patent Rights shall be the Confidential Information of Celgene and all such communications regarding Joint Patent Rights shall be the Confidential Information of both Parties.
Cooperation in Prosecution. The Party exercising the right to Prosecute Novan Patents pursuant to this Section 3.1 will (i) use reasonable efforts to apprise the other Party of any significant developments in the Prosecution of such Novan Patent, and (ii) copy the other Party, or have the other Party copied, on all official correspondence relating to the relevant Novan Patents received from or to be filed with the PTO, within [***] ([***]) days of receipt from the PTO and present a draft of any material proposed response to such correspondence at least [***] ([***]) days prior to filing with the PTO, respectively, including without limitation copies of each patent application, official action, response to official action, declaration, information disclosure statement, terminal disclaimer filing, and request for reexamination. The Party that is not Prosecuting any particular Novan Patent shall cooperate reasonably with the Party that is conducting Prosecution of such Novan Patent. [***] shall satisfy its obligations under this Section 3.1 to fund Prosecution costs incurred by [***] by reimbursing [***] on a [***] basis within [***] ([***]) days of receipt of reasonable documentation of such Prosecution costs incurred by Novan in the prior [***].
Cooperation in Prosecution. (a) With respect to any PATENT RIGHTS, each patent application, office action, response to office action, request for terminal disclaimer, petition, and request for reissue or reexamination of any patent issuing from such application shall be provided to CELGENE sufficiently prior to the filing of such application, response, petition, or request to allow for review and comment by CELGENE. ENTREMED shall have the right to take any action that, in its judgement, is necessary to preserve such PATENT RIGHTS.
(b) Within a reasonable time from the EFFECTIVE DATE, CELGENE and ENTREMED will discuss each party's patent portfolio with regard to PRODUCTS, in accordance with prior obligations of confidentiality owed by each party to any THIRD PARTY, and will use reasonable efforts to coordinate their respective patent portfolio, to the extent possible, so as to maximize the patent protection for PRODUCTS.
Cooperation in Prosecution. Each Party shall provide the other Party all reasonable assistance and cooperation in the Patent prosecution efforts provided above in this Section 9.3, including providing any necessary powers of attorney and executing any other required documents or instruments for such prosecution, as well as further actions as set forth below.
(i) The Parties shall respectively prepare, file, maintain and prosecute the Takeda Patents, Ovid Patents and Joint Patents as set forth in this Section 9.3. As used herein, “prosecution” of such Patents shall include all communication and other interaction with any patent office or patent authority having jurisdiction over a patent application in connection with pre-grant proceedings.
(ii) All communications between the Parties relating to the preparation, filing, prosecution or maintenance of the Takeda Patents, Ovid Patents and Joint Patents, including copies of any draft or final documents or any communications received from or sent to patent offices or patenting authorities with respect to such Patents, shall be considered Confidential Information and subject to the confidentiality provisions of Article 11.
Cooperation in Prosecution. 29 7.3 Infringement and Declaratory Judgment Actions.........................................30