Prosecution of Patent Rights Sample Clauses

Prosecution of Patent Rights. 9.1 IURTC will prepare, file, prosecute, defend, and maintain the Patent Rights in its discretion in accordance with the terms and conditions herein using attorneys of its choosing. IURTC will instruct its attorneys to keep Spotlight informed of patent prosecution in the Field and to seek Spotlight’s comments and suggestions prior to taking material actions for the same (provided Spotlight is not in breach of this Agreement). 9.2 IURTC will authorize Spotlight to communicate directly with IURTC’s patent counsel. All information exchanged among IURTC’s counsel, the Parties, and/or the Inventors regarding the preparation, filing, prosecution, issue, defense, or maintenance of the Patent Rights will be deemed Confidential Information of IURTC. In addition, the Parties acknowledge and agree that, with regard to such preparation, filing, prosecution, issue, defense, and maintenance of the Patent Rights, the interests of the Parties as licensor and licensee are to obtain the strongest and broadest patent protection possible, and as such, are aligned and legal in nature. The Parties agree and acknowledge that they have not waived, and nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver of, any legal privilege concerning the Patent Rights, including without limitation, privilege under the common interest doctrine and similar or related doctrines. 9.3 Spotlight will reimburse IURTC [***] within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date for expenses incurred prior to the Effective Date for the Patent Rights. 9.4 During the Term, Spotlight will reimburse IURTC for all reasonable and documented costs and expenses incurred by IURTC relating to the Patent Rights within thirty (30) days of receipt of billing invoices for such costs and expenses. 9.5 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein: 9.5.1 IURTC may request written confirmation from Spotlight that it will satisfy its reimbursement obligations for any particular fees or expenditures for the Patent Rights at least sixty (60) days in advance of the date on which such expenditure is to be made or such fee is due to be paid. If Spotlight elects not to pay in accordance with Paragraph 9.6 or fails to respond, then such Patent Rights will be removed from the Agreement, the license granted to Spotlight for those patent applications or patents in the Patent Rights will terminate, the definition of Patent Rights will be unilaterally amended to exclude such rights, and IURTC will be free, at IURTC’s sole discretion and wit...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prosecution of Patent Rights. QMT, by counsel it selects, shall have the right, but not the obligation, to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain the Patent Rights in QMT’s name and in countries designated by QMT at the sole discretion of QMT. QMT shall bear all the costs and expenses associated with the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Patent Rights.
Prosecution of Patent Rights. 10.3.1. ROCHE shall have the sole responsibility for the prosecution and maintenance of the ROCHE Patent Rights. ROCHE has no obligation to file additional patents, unless ENS explicitly requests to file an additional patent within ROCHE Patent Rights and agrees to bear the cost and expenses therefore. Otherwise, the costs for the prosecution and the maintenance of the ROCHE Patent Rights shall be borne by ROCHE. ROCHE shall have the right, but not the obligation, to defend and enforce the ROCHE Patent Rights and ENS Patent Rights. 10.3.2. ENS shall have the sole responsibility for the prosecution and maintenance of the ENS Patent Rights. The costs for the prosecution and the maintenance of the ENS Patent Rights shall be borne by ENS, subject to Section 10.4. below.
Prosecution of Patent Rights. Patent Rights shall be prosecuted as set forth in the Collaboration Agreement.
Prosecution of Patent Rights. NBL shall solely control the prosecution and maintenance of all Neotope Patent Rights, and shall pay all costs associated therewith incurred after the Effective Date and shall have no obligation to Elan in respect of such Neotope Patent Rights. EPI shall solely control the prosecution of Synuclein Patent Rights; provided, however, that EPI shall keep NBL reasonably apprised of the status of the Synuclein Patent Rights and reasonably consider the input of NBL with respect to the prosecution of any claims in the Synuclein Patent Rights solely related to the Projects.
Prosecution of Patent Rights. Proprius, at Proprius’ own expense, shall file, prosecute, issue and maintain all the Patent Rights. Proprius shaft provide Prometheus the right to review and comment on draft submissions to any patent office with respect to the Patent Rights reasonably in advance of any applicable due dates. Proprius shall consider in good faith the requests and suggestions of Prometheus with respect to strategies for filing and prosecuting the Patent Rights. In connection with Proprius’ performance of its obligations under this Section 8.1, Proprius shall provide written notification to Prometheus of significant activities resulting from Proprius’ actions under this Section 8.1 and shall provide Prometheus with reasonable access to and copies of the records related to such activities. Accordingly, Proprius shall provide Prometheus with copies of (a) all actions, notices and other correspondence received from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or any foreign equivalent, (b) responses and correspondence to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or any foreign equivalent, and (c) the original issued patent documents, certificates or equivalents thereof. In the event Proprius elects or has elected not to pursue patent protection or to continue to prosecute or maintain any patent or patent application of the Patent Rights, Proprius shall so advise Prometheus in writing not less than [***] days prior to any potential loss of rights; then, Prometheus shall have the right, but not the obligation, to assume prosecution or maintenance of such patent or patent application of the Patent Rights. If Prometheus elects to assume maintenance of such patent or if Prometheus elects to assume prosecution of such patent application, then thereafter, the license to such patent-n the region in question shall either revert to a non-exclusive license or be removed from the Patent Rights, in the sole discretion, and upon the written election, of Prometheus.
Prosecution of Patent Rights. Sol-Gel shall be responsible for and have sole control over, at its cost, the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of all Licensed Patent Rights in Sol-Gel’s name in the Territory. Sol-Gel will: (i) instruct such patent counsel to provide SLP with copies of all filings and formal correspondences relating to such Licensed Patent Rights in the Territory and (ii) keep SLP advised of the status of actual and prospective patent filings related to the Licensed Product in the Territory. Sol-Gel will give SLP the opportunity to provide and will reasonably consider comments on the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Licensed Patent Rights in the Territory. Sol-Gel, reserves the sole right to make all final decisions regarding the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Licensed Patent Rights. Each Party will treat any consultation regarding the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Licensed Patent Rights, along with any information disclosed by each Party in connection therewith (including any information concerning patent expenses), as part of Sol-Gel’s Confidential Information. Sol-Gel may elect at its sole discretion not to continue to seek or maintain any Licensed Patent Rights covering the Licensed Product in the Territory [***] jurisdiction. In such case, Sol-Gel will provide SLP with [***] days advance written notice of its intention to abandon such Licensed Patent Rights. If Sol-Gel elects not to continue to seek or maintain any Licensed Patent Rights covering the Licensed Product in the Territory for any other reason (the "Abandoned Patent Rights"), then Sol-Gel shall provide SLP with timely notice with respect to its decision, and will provide SLP with a reasonable opportunity to assume responsibility for the continued prosecution and maintenance of such Licensed Patent Rights at its own cost, in the name of SLP, and Sol-Gel will free of charge assign and transfer to SLP the ownership and interest in such Licensed Patent Rights.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prosecution of Patent Rights. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Existing Third Party Agreements to the extent such agreement applies to the Agios Patent Rights or Agios Collaboration Patent Rights, the following provisions shall apply with respect to the Agios Patent Rights, Celgene Patent Rights and Collaboration Patent Rights:
Prosecution of Patent Rights. (a) Regeneron shall have the right and option (but not the obligation) to file and prosecute any patent applications and to maintain any patents within the Regeneron Patent Rights in Regeneron’s name, and to control any interferences, reissue proceedings and re-examinations relating thereto; provided, however, that, Regeneron shall use commercially reasonable efforts (i) to prosecute the patent applications listed in Exhibit B in *************************************, and (ii) to maintain the patents listed in Exhibit B and the patents resulting from the patent applications listed in Exhibit B in ***********************************************. (b) Company shall have the right and option (but not the obligation) to file and prosecute any patent applications and to maintain any patents within the Company Patent Rights in Company’s name, and to control any interferences, reissue proceedings and re-examinations relating thereto.
Prosecution of Patent Rights. 9.3.1. ROCHE shall have the sole responsibility for the prosecution and maintenance of the ROCHE Patent Rights. ROCHE has no obligation to file additional patents, unless EVOTEC explicitly requests to file an additional patent within ROCHE Patent Rights and agrees to bear the cost and expenses therefore. Otherwise, the costs for the prosecution and the maintenance of the ROCHE Patent Rights shall be borne by ROCHE. ROCHE shall have the right, but not the obligation, to defend and enforce the ROCHE Patent Rights. * Portions of this document marked with **** have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment submitted with the SEC. 9.3.2. EVOTEC shall have the sole responsibility for the prosecution and maintenance of the EVOTEC Patent Rights. The costs for the prosecution and the maintenance of the EVOTEC Patent Rights shall be borne by EVOTEC, subject to Section 9.4. below.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!