CORE PERFORMANCE MEASURES Sample Clauses

CORE PERFORMANCE MEASURES. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the states, through The Environmental Council of the States (ECOS), have been working together to develop a set of core performance measures. It is envisioned that EPA and all the states can use the information to report environmental data on water quality and other media in a comprehensive and consistent manner within the capability of current data base systems. If so, the data can be compiled in existing national databases. The Department of Ecology, a participant in the ECOS endeavor, is fully supportive of this national effort. The CORE Performance Measures are not new, yet when combined with the Associated Reporting Measures do represent changes to the way Ecology collects and reports progress and data. Data systems and information necessary to fully satisfy EPA requirements do not currently exist. In addition common format standards for data and reporting between Ecology and EPA programs do not exist. Region 10 of EPA and Ecology are working together to review existing databases, reports and reporting capabilities to meet this challenge. The EPA and the states in a joint statement on August 20, 1997 approved CORE Performance Measures for FY 1998. The Department of Ecology endorses the continued use of these CORE Performance Measures applicable to Washington for FY 1999. For additional information or copies of the Core measures, Compliance Assurance Agreements, or Program Evaluation Principals please contact: For Ecology: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx WA Department of Ecology PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 00000-0000 Phone: 000-000-0000 FAX: 000-000-0000 Email: xxxx000@xxx.xx.xxx For EPA Region 10: Xxxx Xxxxxx US EPA, Region 10 Washington Operations Office 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Lacey, WA 98503 Phone: 000-000-0000 FAX: 000-000-0000 Email: xxxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xxx
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CORE PERFORMANCE MEASURES. A. WATER QUALITY MEASURES Core Performance Measures and Associated Reporting Requirements: These measures will be reported annually unless specified otherwise.
Sample 1

Related to CORE PERFORMANCE MEASURES

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.