Department Challenge of a Member’s Sick Leave Status Sample Clauses

Department Challenge of a Member’s Sick Leave Status. At no time may a representative of the Department contact a member’s treating physician, in writing (except the Department’s mailing of the “Medical Evaluation for Light Duty Status” form), via telephone, in person, or through any other means, without the authority of the member. The member’s refusal to grant said authority shall in no way affect his/her Sick Leave status. Any Department challenge or question concerning a member’s Sick Leave status may only be enacted through the following process. With respect to any Member who has been out on Sick Leave for more than twenty one (21) consecutive days, after the Department’s receipt of the Member’s initial medical letter or medical report from his/her treating physician, and/or after the Department’s receipt of the submission of a ninety (90) calendar day Sick Leave status medical update from the Member’s treating physician, the Police Department may challenge the Member’s Sick Leave status through the process set forth below on the grounds that the Member is no longer incapacitated from the performance of his/her full police duties (i.e. whether the Member is capable of performing light duty or full duty police duties). Provided, however, such Department challenges may be conducted no more than one (1) time per three (3) month period. In such case, the Department shall require the Member to be examined by a physician of the Department’s choice (“Department physician”). The Department physician shall be asked to determine whether or not the Member is still incapacitated from the performance of his/her full police duties (i.e. whether the Member is capable of performing light duty or full duty police duties). The cost of any examination by a Department physician shall be paid for by the City. If the Department physician advises the Chief in writing that in his/her medical opinion the member is no longer incapacitated from the performance of his/her full police duties, then said member shall be informed and shall be entitled to be examined again by his/her treating physician within a reasonable period of time (e.g. 30 days). The member’s treating physician shall examine said member and render his/her medical opinion with respect to whether the Member is still incapacitated from the performance of his/her full police duties or light duty. Notwithstanding, if the member has been regularly seeing his/her treating physician and/or has received a written report from his/her treating physician within ninety (90) c...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Department Challenge of a Member’s Sick Leave Status. At no time may a representative of the Department contact a member’s treating physician, in writing (except the Department’s mailing of the “Medical Evaluation for Light Duty Status” form), via telephone, in person, or through any other means, without the authority of the member. The member’s refusal to grant said authority shall in no way affect his/her Sick Leave status. Any Department challenge or question concerning a member’s Sick Leave status may only be enacted through the following process. With respect to any Member who has been out on Sick Leave for more than twenty one
Sample 1

Related to Department Challenge of a Member’s Sick Leave Status

  • Individual Grievance Subject to clause 19.5 and as provided in section 208 of the PSLRA, an employee is entitled to present a grievance in the manner prescribed in clause 19.10 if the employee feels aggrieved (a) by the interpretation or application in respect of the employee, of (i) a provision of a statute or regulation, or a by-law, direction or other instrument made or issued by the Council, dealing with terms and conditions of employment; or (ii) a provision of a collective agreement or an arbitral award; or (b) as a result of any other occurrence or matter affecting the employee’s terms and conditions of employment.

  • Restricted Employment for Certain State Personnel Contractor acknowledges that, pursuant to Section 572.069 of the Texas Government Code, a former state officer or employee of a state agency who during the period of state service or employment participated on behalf of a state agency in a procurement or contract negotiation involving Contractor may not accept employment from Contractor before the second anniversary of the date the Contract is signed or the procurement is terminated or withdrawn.

  • Convicted, Discriminatory, Antitrust Violator, and Suspended Vendor Lists In accordance with sections 287.133, 287.134, and 287.137, F.S., the Contractor is hereby informed of the provisions of sections 287.133(2)(a), 287.134(2)(a), and 287.137(2)(a), F.S. For purposes of this Contract, a person or affiliate who is on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List may not perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under the Contract. The Contractor must notify the Department if it or any of its suppliers, subcontractors, or consultants have been placed on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List during the term of the Contract. In accordance with section 287.1351, F.S., a vendor placed on the Suspended Vendor List may not enter into or renew a contract to provide any goods or services to an agency after its placement on the Suspended Vendor List. A firm or individual placed on the Suspended Vendor List pursuant to section 287.1351, F.S., the Convicted Vendor List pursuant to section 287.133, F.S., the Antitrust Violator Vendor List pursuant to section 287.137, F.S., or the Discriminatory Vendor List pursuant to section 287.134, F.S., is immediately disqualified from Contract eligibility.

  • SALARY DETERMINATION FOR EMPLOYEES IN ADULT EDUCATION 1. The following shall apply to employees providing instruction in adult education programs in these districts: Continuing Education employees in the Adult Education High School Completion Program (credit courses) and Adult Education Academic Upgrading Programs (Adult Basic Education, General Education Development, Pre-General Education Development, Literacy and Adult Education English Language Programs). Employees teaching Adult Education academic programs including: High School Completion Program, Pathfinder High School Completion Program, Academic Business Education Program, General Equivalency Diploma Program, Adult Basic Education Program, Adult English as a Second Language Program, and Adult Special Education Program, in the Continuing Education Division.

  • Religious Objection Any employee who is a member of and adheres to established and traditional tenets or teachings of a bona fide religion, body, or sect which has historically held conscientious objections to joining or financially supporting labor organizations shall not be required to join or financially support the Union as a condition of employment. Such an employee shall, in lieu of dues and fees, pay sums equal to such dues and fees to a non-religious charitable fund. These religious objections and decisions as to which fund will be used must be documented and declared in writing to the Union. Any employee exercising their right of religious objection must provide the Union with a receipt of payment to an appropriate charity on a monthly basis.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!