Design Reviews and Ownership Sample Clauses

Design Reviews and Ownership. The initial design and user interface of the Service shall be jointly owned by the parties. Netscape and N2K shall mutually agree to all major design changes in the Service, including, but not limited to, significant new artwork or functional changes. As part of the approval process for significant changes to the Service, the parties shall determine the ownership rights with respect to newly added features or functionality. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if either party has contributed to the Service intellectual property rights owned by that party, the other party shall be granted a royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual worldwide license, without payment or other charge therefor, to use, display, perform, reproduce and distribute such intellectual property in connection with the Service during the Term. Copyrighted elements contained in a Service shall be the property of the copyright owner. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Netscape from independently developing features or functionality which are similar to the features and functionality owned by N2K and implemented in the Service, provided that such independently developed features and functionality do not infringe any of N2K's intellectual property rights. 8.5. [****] for Netscape Technology. [****] (a) N2K and Netscape shall mutually establish a timetable whereby, within a reasonable period of time, N2K shall implement within the Service a [****] interface including [****] or the then current client software technology (or subsequent features displayable by an end user's browser) within the beta testing period of the client software. Such features shall be [****] within the Service, and the optimized content shall be fully operational and publicly accessible at the time of the release of the new Netscape client products. Netscape shall give N2K advance notice of any new features and functionalities so that N2K has an opportunity to incorporate in the Service such features and functionalities as described herein; (b) N2K agrees to use [****] and, if requested, provide Netscape with evidence of such use. Such [****] shall be provided to N2K free of charge; (c) Within the Service, N2K shall use [****] (unless such use would impose unreasonable burdens on N2K as N2K shall notify to Netscape) and N2K shall promote [****]
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design Reviews and Ownership. The graphic user interface ("GUI") of the Services shall be jointly owned by the parties, as mutually determined by the parties. Netscape and Co-Marketer shall mutually agree to all major design changes in the GUI, including, but not limited to, significant new artwork or functional changes. As part of the approval process for significant changes to the GUI the parties shall determine the ownership rights with respect to the newly added feature or functionality, and either party may decline to add such feature or functionality to the GUI. If either party has contributed to the GUI such features or functionality owned by that party, the other party shall be granted a royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual world-wide license, without payment or other charge therefore, to use, display, perform, reproduce and distribute such feature or functionality in connection with the GUI in the Services or any successor service after the termination or expiration of this Agreement. In no event shall Netscape be entitled to a license or any ownership right in any computer code written by Co-Marketer in connection with the GUI. Any versions of the Services or successor programs or promotions to the Services operated by Netscape after termination or expiration of this Agreement shall be distinct from Co-Marketer Brand Service and shall have a concept, look and feel distinct from Co-Marketer Brand Service. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Netscape from independently developing features or functionality which are similar to the features and functionality owned by Co-Marketer and implemented in the Services, provided that no intellectual property of Co-Marketer is utilized. The parties agree that Co-Marketer is not creating the Services as a work made for hire. Except as set forth above with respect to the GUI, nothing in the Agreement shall be deemed to grant to Netscape an express or implied license or ownership right to any copyright, trademark, trade secret or patent to any technology, content, or other material of Co-Marketer created for or included in the Services, whether or not such were created at Netscape's request or with Netscape's cooperation. Confidential and Proprietary
Design Reviews and Ownership 

Related to Design Reviews and Ownership

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation 4.1.1 The Power Producer shall give at least fifteen (15) days written notice to the SLDC / ALDC / DISCOM as the case may be, of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System. 4.1.2 Subject to Article 4.1.1, the Power Project may be synchronized by the Power Producer to the Grid System when it meets all the connection conditions prescribed in the Grid Code and otherwise meets all other Indian legal requirements for synchronization to the Grid System. 4.1.3 The synchronization equipment and all necessary arrangements / equipment including Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) for scheduling of power generated from the Project and transmission of data to the concerned authority as per applicable regulation shall be installed by the Power Producer at its generation facility of the Power Project at its own cost. The Power Producer shall synchronize its system with the Grid System only after the approval of GETCO / SLDC / ALDC and GEDA. 4.1.4 The Power Producer shall immediately after each synchronization / tripping of generator, inform the sub-station of the Grid System to which the Power Project is electrically connected in accordance with applicable Grid Code. 4.1.5 The Power Producer shall commission the Project within SCOD. 4.1.6 The Power Producer shall be required to obtain Developer and/ or Transfer Permission, Key Plan drawing etc, if required, from GEDA. In cases of conversion of land from Agricultural to Non-Agriculture, the commissioning shall be taken up by GEDA only upon submission of N.A. permission by the Power Producer. 4.1.7 The Power Producer shall be required to follow the Forecasting and Scheduling procedures as per the Regulations issued by Hon’ble GERC from time to time. It is to clarify that in terms of GERC (Forecasting, Scheduling, Deviation Settlement and Related Matters of Solar and Wind Generation Sources) Regulations, 2019 the procedures for Forecasting, Scheduling & Deviation Settlment are applicable to all solar generators having combined installed capacity above 1 MW connected to the State Grid / Substation including those connected via pooling stations.

  • PROGRESS AND COMPLETION 8.2.1 All time limits stated in the Contract Documents are material terms and time is the essence of the Contract. A failure by Contractor to do what is required by the time specified in the Contract Documents is a breach of the contract. 8.2.2 The Contractor shall begin the Work on the date of commencement as defined in 8.2.3 If in the sole opinion of the State, the Contractor fails to commence work on the project or to complete the work of said project within the time specified above, or to prosecute the work in such a manner that it appears that the completion date can be assured, the State shall have the right to notify the Contractor by Certified Mail that the terms of the Contract have been violated, and that effective immediately the Contract is terminated and the State has the right to and in fact is taking over and attending to completion of the project without prejudice to the State's remedies for any losses sustained

  • Project Management Plan 3.2.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work. Developer shall undertake all aspects of quality assurance and quality control for the Project and Work in accordance with the approved Project Management Plan, Good Industry Practice and applicable Law. 3.2.2 Developer shall develop the Project Management Plan and its component parts, plans and other documentation in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 1.5.2.5

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!