DETERMINATION OF CONFLICT Sample Clauses

DETERMINATION OF CONFLICT. SANDAG is a government agency subject to conflict of interest laws and its Standard of Conduct calls for avoidance of the perception of impropriety. As Consultant, Consultant's eligibility to provide services under the Agreement could be affected by conflicts of interest. If Consultant has reason to believe that it has, or potentially could have, a financial or organizational conflict of interest, Consultant is obligated to immediately inform the SANDAG Office of General Counsel. A prohibited organizational conflict of interest exists when a firm is or may be unable to render impartial, objective assistance or advice to SANDAG or where a firm would receive an unfair competitive advantage. In addition, Consultant is required to disclose any pending or active investigations or litigation that may affect the reputation or ability of Consultant to carry out the Project. Examples of situations that could create a conflict of interest are discussed in Board Policy No. 016, and include situations that can arise when a Consultant represents a client that has sued SANDAG or one of its member agencies, or when Consultant assists SANDAG with preparing estimates, scopes of work, specifications, or evaluation criteria that will be used in a future procurement. These examples are not exhaustive. A process for determining whether Consultant has a conflict is set forth in Board Policy No. 16. Consultant, its subconsultants and affiliates (a firm that is subject to the control of the same persons through joint ownership or otherwise) of either may be found ineligible due to actual or potential conflict. Proposers are hereby placed on notice that work awarded this Agreement may preclude a Consultant or Subconsultant from working on future stages of a project due to a conflict of interest. For example, if a SANDAG Consultant is awarded a scope of work to assist SANDAG in developing a scope of work for another procurement, the Consultant would have an unfair competitive advantage and would therefore be ineligible to compete when that procurement was issued.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DETERMINATION OF CONFLICT. A prohibited conflict of interest may exist for Consultant pursuant to SANDAG Board Policy No. 016, Procurement of Services, or the terms of this Agreement when because of other activities, relationships, or contracts, or policy positions of Consultant's governing body, Consultant is or may be unable to render impartial, objective assistance, or advice to SANDAG; or a firm's objectivity in performing the contract work is or might be otherwise impaired; or where a firm would receive an unfair competitive advantage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant will not have a prohibited conflict under this Agreement on the basis of it expressing the position or opinions of the stakeholders it is representing as part of the Scope of Work for this Agreement. If at some point; however, Consultant's governing body, officers, or leadership plan to take a position that is in opposition to SANDAG or a SANDAG policy position, Consultant shall communicate in good faith and in advance to SANDAG to allow XXXXXX and Consultant the opportunity to discuss their differences. Should Consultant believe that it may have a conflict of interest or appearance of conflict of interest in the performance of this Agreement, it will notify the SANDAG Project Manager for the Project immediately. If at any time SANDAG determines that Consultant is not acting merely as a conduit to SANDAG of its stakeholders' comments, but instead is taking a position of opposition to SANDAG; or if SANDAG determines that Consultant will be unable to render impartial outreach and liaison assistance to SANDAG or to carry out the Scope of Work in accordance with SANDAG direction; or that Consultant is providing factually incorrect information regarding SANDAG to stakeholders, this Agreement may be terminated for cause. Consultant agrees to avoid performing services for any person or entity or entering into any contractual or other relationship with any person or entity that might render it unable to objectively or effectively carry out the Scope of Work or create an unfair competitive advantage for Consultant for future procurements.
DETERMINATION OF CONFLICT. SANDAG is a government agency subject to conflict of interest laws and its Standard of Conduct calls for avoidance of the perception of impropriety. As Consultant, Consultant's eligibility to provide services under the Agreement could be affected by conflicts of interest. If Consultant has reason to believe that it has, or potentially could have, a financial or organizational conflict of interest, Consultant is obligated to promptly inform the SANDAG Office of General Counsel. A prohibited organizational conflict of interest exists when a firm is or may be unable to render impartial, objective assistance or advice to SANDAG or where a firm would receive an unfair competitive advantage. Consultant shall not assign persons to any portion of the work under this Agreement who were employed by XXXXXX in the immediately preceding twelve months, unless prior written consent is obtained from SANDAG. In addition, Consultant is required to disclose any pending or active investigations or litigation that may affect the reputation or ability of Consultant to carry out the Project. Examples of situations that could create a conflict of interest are discussed in Board Policy No. 016, and include situations that can arise when a Consultant represents a client that has sued SANDAG or one of its member agencies, or when Consultant assists SANDAG with preparing estimates, scopes of work, specifications, or evaluation criteria that will be used in a future procurement. These examples are not exhaustive. A process for determining whether Consultant has a conflict is set forth in Board Policy No. 16. Consultant, its subconsultants and affiliates (a firm that is subject to the control of the same persons through joint ownership or otherwise) of either may be found ineligible due to actual or potential conflict.

Related to DETERMINATION OF CONFLICT

  • Determination of Agreement 29. (1) In any of the following events namely if —

  • Resolution of Conflicts Should any conflicts arise among the Management Directors regarding the operations of Fund, the audit committee, consisting of the Non-Management Directors will resolve the conflict.

  • Determination of Cost The Design Professional shall review the Contractor’s proposed cost of the work, time to complete, effect upon the Overall Progress Schedule, and effect upon time dependent costs, and provide appropriate comments within fourteen calendar days concerning such proposed costs and expenses.

  • Effect of cessation or determination of Agreement 35. (1) On the cessation or determination of this Agreement —

  • Violation of Contract a. If Purchaser violates any provision of this contract, the Contract Administrator, by written notice, may suspend delivery of further loads of forest products. If the violation is capable of being remedied, the Purchaser has five (5) days after receipt of suspension notice to remedy the violation. If the violation cannot be remedied (such as violation of WAC 240-15-015) or Purchaser fails to remedy the violation within five (5) days after receipt of a suspension notice, the State may terminate the rights of the Purchaser under this contract and collect damages as described in the damages clause in this contract.

  • Interpretation of Contract In the event of a conflict or question involving the provisions of any part of this Contract, interpretation and clarification as necessary shall be determined by the County’s assigned buyer. If disagreement exists between the Contractor and the County’s assigned buyer in interpreting the provision(s), final interpretation and clarification shall be determined by the County’s Purchasing Agent or his designee.

  • DETERMINATION OF BREACH AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. Prior to making a determination that the Applicant has failed to comply in any material respect with the terms of this Agreement or to meet any material obligation under this Agreement, the District shall provide the Applicant with a written notice of the facts which it believes have caused the breach of this Agreement, and if cure is possible, the cure proposed by the District. After receipt of the notice, the Applicant shall be given ninety (90) days to present any facts or arguments to the Board of Trustees showing that it is not in breach of its obligations under this Agreement, or that it has cured or undertaken to cure any such breach.

  • DETERMINATION OF DISPUTES Any dispute arising under this Section 2.6 shall be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution procedures of Article 7.

  • Violation of Contract Terms Fees charged to a customer for use of the vehicle contrary to the terms of the vehicle rental contract including but not limited to speeding, driving under the influence of an intoxicant or controlled substance, taking the vehicle out of state or out of an approved area as defined in the contract, regardless whether customer was arrested, cited or otherwise penalized by law enforcement authorities for such conduct.

  • Determination of Position(s) The Appointing Authority shall determine the position(s) in the class or class option, if one exists, and employment condition and work location which is to be eliminated.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.