Common use of Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance Clause in Contracts

Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board may dismiss a teacher under this article if: a. A teacher is in the first year of appointment and the Board has received two (2) reports pursuant to Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. b. After a teacher has completed one (1) year of term/continuing appointment and the Board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the employee is less than satisfactory. 2. The reports referred to in Article C.22.1 shall have been prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) of this Agreement, and in accordance with the following conditions: 3. Except for a teacher in the first year of an appointment, the reports are written within a period of not less than twelve (12) months and not more than twenty-four (24) months, excluding time off due to illness, leave or retraining and such period not to include the time during which the employee is participating in an agreed upon plan of assistance pursuant to Article E.26.5 or the leave granted in Article C.22.8. 4. The reports leading to dismissal shall be written by at least three (3) different evaluators, one of whom shall be a Superintendent of Schools or Assistant Superintendent of Schools; the other reports shall be written by a Principal/Vice Principal, Director, Assistant Superintendent of Schools or Superintendent of Schools; 5. The reports shall be written independently of each other, and the report writers shall not collaborate with regard to the results; 6. Where the Board intends to dismiss a teacher on grounds of less than satisfactory teaching situation, it shall, no later than two (2) calendar months prior to the end of a school term, notify the teacher and the President of the Association of such intention and provide an opportunity for the teacher and their representative to meet with the superintendent and the Board within fourteen (14) days of such notice. 7. Where, subsequent to such meeting, the Board decides to dismiss a teacher pursuant to Section 122.1 of the School Act, R.S.B.C. 1996.

Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board may shall not dismiss a teacher under this article if: a. A teacher is in other than a Teacher Teaching on Call (TTOC) on the first year basis of appointment and “less than satisfactory” performance of teaching duties except where the Board board has received two at least three (23) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 C.22 (Evaluation Teacher Evaluation) of Teaching) this agreement indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. b. After a teacher has completed one (1) year of term/continuing appointment and the Board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the employee is less than satisfactory. 2. The reports referred to in Article C.22.1 shall have been be prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) of this Agreement, and in accordance with the following conditionsfollowing: 3. Except for a teacher in the first year of an appointment, a. the reports are written within shall have been issued in a period of not less than twelve (12) months and not or more than twenty-four (24) monthsconsecutive months exclusive of any approved leave of absence; b. at least one (1) of the reports shall be a report of a Superintendent, excluding time off due an Assistant Superintendent, or a District Principal; c. the other two (2) reports shall include only reports of: i. a Superintendent or an Assistant Superintendent, or ii. a Director of Instruction, or iii. a District Principal, or iv. the Principal of a school to illness, leave or retraining and such period not to include the time during which the employee teacher is participating in an agreed upon plan of assistance pursuant to Article E.26.5 or assigned; d. the leave granted in Article C.22.8. 4. The reports leading to dismissal shall be written independently prepared by at least three (3) different evaluators. 3. Subsequent to the teacher receiving one (I) or two (2) “less than satisfactory” reports, the teacher: a. may request a transfer to a mutually agreeable assignment; b. may request a leave of absence for up to one (1) year for the purpose of whom taking a program of professional or academic instruction, in which case subsequent evaluation(s) shall be a Superintendent undertaken within the balance of Schools the twenty-four (24) months exclusive of the leave of absence period. Upon return to duty, the next evaluation will commence in not less than three (3) or Assistant Superintendent of Schools; the other reports more than six (6) working months. c. shall be written requested to participate in a plan of assistance appropriate to the development of an acceptable standard of performance as it pertains to the evaluation criteria. Where a plan of assistance is implemented it shall be completed before another report is initiated. 4. Upon receiving a third “less than satisfactory” report, the teacher will be given fifteen (15) days’ notice of the Board meeting to be held to consider the dismissal of the teacher. The teacher has the right to attend that meeting. If attending, the teacher will be accompanied by a Principal/Vice Principal, Director, Assistant Superintendent representative of Schools or Superintendent of Schools;the Association. 5. The reports Association shall be written independently have the option of each other, referring all dismissals resulting from this Article and the report writers shall not collaborate with regard all applicable documentation to the results; 6. Where the Board intends to dismiss a teacher on grounds of less than satisfactory teaching situation, it shall, no later than two (2) calendar months prior to the end of a school term, notify the teacher and the President of the Association of such intention and provide an opportunity for the teacher and their representative to meet with the superintendent and the Board within fourteen (14) days of such notice. 7. Where, subsequent to such meeting, the Board decides to dismiss a teacher pursuant to Section 122.1 of the School Act, R.S.B.C. 1996.Article A.6.6 or Article A.6.7 –

Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board may shall not dismiss a teacher under this article if: a. A teacher is in other than a teacher-teaching-on-call on the first year basis of appointment and “less than satisfactory” performance of teaching duties except where the Board board has received two at least three (23) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 C.22 (Evaluation Teacher Evaluation) of Teaching) this agreement indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. b. After a teacher has completed one (1) year of term/continuing appointment and the Board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the employee is less than satisfactory. 2. The reports referred to in Article C.22.1 shall have been be prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) of this Agreement, and in accordance with the following conditionsfollowing: 3. Except for a teacher in the first year of an appointment, a. the reports are written within shall have been issued in a period of not less than twelve (12) months and not or more than twenty-four (24) monthsconsecutive months exclusive of any approved leave of absence; b. at least one (1) of the reports shall be a report of a Superintendent, excluding time off due an Assistant Superintendent, or a District Principal; c. the other two (2) reports shall include only reports of: i. a Superintendent or an Assistant Superintendent, or ii. a Director of Instruction, or iii. a District Principal, or iv. the Principal of a school to illness, leave or retraining and such period not to include the time during which the employee teacher is participating in an agreed upon plan of assistance pursuant to Article E.26.5 or assigned; d. the leave granted in Article C.22.8. 4. The reports leading to dismissal shall be written independently prepared by at least three (3) different evaluators. 3. Subsequent to the teacher receiving one (I) or two (2) “less than satisfactory” reports, the teacher: a. may request a transfer to a mutually agreeable assignment; b. may request a leave of absence for up to one (1) year for the purpose of whom taking a program of professional or academic instruction, in which case subsequent evaluation(s) shall be a Superintendent undertaken within the balance of Schools the twenty-four (24) months exclusive of the leave of absence period. Upon return to duty, the next evaluation will commence in not less than three (3) or Assistant Superintendent of Schools; the other reports more than six (6) working months. c. shall be written requested to participate in a plan of assistance appropriate to the development of an acceptable standard of performance as it pertains to the evaluation criteria. Where a plan of assistance is implemented it shall be completed before another report is initiated. 4. Upon receiving a third “less than satisfactory” report, the teacher will be given fifteen (15) days’ notice of the Board meeting to be held to consider the dismissal of the teacher. The teacher has the right to attend that meeting. If attending, the teacher will be accompanied by a Principal/Vice Principal, Director, Assistant Superintendent representative of Schools or Superintendent of Schools;the Association. 5. The reports Association shall be written independently have the option of each other, referring all dismissals resulting from this Article and the report writers shall not collaborate with regard all applicable documentation to the results; 6. Where the Board intends to dismiss a teacher on grounds of less than satisfactory teaching situation, it shall, no later than two (2) calendar months prior to the end of a school term, notify the teacher and the President of the Association of such intention and provide an opportunity for the teacher and their representative to meet with the superintendent and the Board within fourteen (14) days of such notice. 7. Where, subsequent to such meeting, the Board decides to dismiss a teacher pursuant to Section 122.1 of the School Act, R.S.B.C. 1996.Article A.6.6 or Article A.6.7 –

Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board may shall not dismiss a teacher under this article if: a. A teacher is in other than a teacher-teaching-on-call on the first year basis of appointment and “less than satisfactory” performance of teaching duties except where the Board board has received two at least three (23) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 C.22 (Evaluation Teacher Evaluation) of Teaching) this agreement indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. b. After a teacher has completed one (1) year of term/continuing appointment and the Board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the employee is less than satisfactory. 2. The reports referred to in Article C.22.1 shall have been be prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) of this Agreement, and in accordance with the following conditionsfollowing: 3. Except for a teacher in the first year of an appointment, a. the reports are written within shall have been issued in a period of not less than twelve (12) months and not or more than twenty-four (24) monthsconsecutive months exclusive of any approved leave of absence; b. at least one (1) of the reports shall be a report of a Superintendent, excluding time off due an Assistant Superintendent, or a District Principal; c. the other two (2) reports shall include only reports of: i. a Superintendent or an Assistant Superintendent, or ii. a Director of Instruction, or iii. a District Principal, or iv. the Principal of a school to illness, leave or retraining and such period not to include the time during which the employee teacher is participating in an agreed upon plan of assistance pursuant to Article E.26.5 or assigned; d. the leave granted in Article C.22.8. 4. The reports leading to dismissal shall be written independently prepared by at least three (3) different evaluators. 3. Subsequent to the teacher receiving one (I) or two (2) “less than satisfactory” reports, the teacher: a. may request a transfer to a mutually agreeable assignment; b. may request a leave of absence for up to one (1) year for the purpose of whom taking a program of professional or academic instruction, in which case subsequent evaluation(s) shall be a Superintendent undertaken within the balance of Schools the twenty-four (24) months exclusive of the leave of absence period. Upon return to duty, the next evaluation will commence in not less than three (3) or Assistant Superintendent of Schools; the other reports more than six (6) working months. c. shall be written requested to participate in a plan of assistance appropriate to the development of an acceptable standard of performance as it pertains to the evaluation criteria. Where a plan of assistance is implemented it shall be completed before another report is initiated. 4. Upon receiving a third “less than satisfactory” report, the teacher will be given fifteen (15) days‟ notice of the Board meeting to be held to consider the dismissal of the teacher. The teacher has the right to attend that meeting. If attending, the teacher will be accompanied by a Principal/Vice Principal, Director, Assistant Superintendent representative of Schools or Superintendent of Schools;the Association. 5. The reports Association shall be written independently have the option of each other, referring all dismissals resulting from this Article and the report writers shall not collaborate with regard all applicable documentation to the results; 6. Where the Board intends to dismiss a teacher on grounds of less than satisfactory teaching situation, it shall, no later than two (2) calendar months prior to the end of a school term, notify the teacher and the President of the Association of such intention and provide an opportunity for the teacher and their representative to meet with the superintendent and the Board within fourteen (14) days of such notice. 7. Where, subsequent to such meeting, the Board decides to dismiss a teacher pursuant to Section 122.1 of the School Act, R.S.B.C. 1996.Article A.6.6 or Article A.6.7 –

Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board may dismiss a teacher under this article if: a. A teacher is in the first year of appointment and the Board has received two (2) reports pursuant to Article E.26 506 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. b. After a teacher has completed one (1) year of term/continuing appointment and the Board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the employee is less than satisfactory. 2. The reports referred to in Article C.22.1 shall have been prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) of this Agreement, and in accordance with the following conditions: 3. Except for a teacher in the first year of an appointment, the reports are written within a period of not less than twelve (12) months and not more than twenty-four (24) months, excluding time off due to illness, leave or retraining and such period not to include the time during which the employee is participating in an agreed upon plan of assistance pursuant to Article E.26.5 or the leave granted in Article C.22.8. 4. The reports leading to dismissal shall be written by at least three (3) different evaluators, one of whom shall be a Superintendent of Schools or Assistant Superintendent of Schools; the other reports shall be written by a Principal/Vice Principal, Director, Assistant Superintendent of Schools or Superintendent of Schools; 5. The reports shall be written independently of each other, and the report writers shall not collaborate with regard to the results; 6. Where the Board intends to dismiss a teacher on grounds of less than satisfactory teaching situation, it shall, no later than two (2) calendar months prior to the end of a school term, notify the teacher and the President of the Association of such intention and provide an opportunity for the teacher and their her/his representative to meet with the superintendent and the Board within fourteen (14) days of such notice. 7. Where, subsequent to such meeting, the Board decides to dismiss a teacher pursuant to Section 122.1 of the School Act, R.S.B.C. 1996.

Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board may dismiss a teacher under this article if: a. A teacher is in the first year of appointment and the Board has received two (2) reports pursuant to Article E.26 506 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. b. After a teacher has completed one (1) year of term/continuing appointment and the Board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the employee is less than satisfactory. 2. The reports referred to in Article C.22.1 shall have been prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) of this Agreement, and in accordance with the following conditions: 3. Except for a teacher in the first year of an appointment, the reports are written within a period of not less than twelve (12) months and not more than twenty-four (24) months, excluding time off due to illness, leave or retraining and such period not to include the time during which the employee is participating in an agreed upon plan of assistance pursuant to Article E.26.5 or the leave granted in Article C.22.8. 4. The reports leading to dismissal shall be written by at least three (3) different evaluators, one of whom shall be a Superintendent of Schools or Assistant Superintendent of Schools; the other reports shall be written by a Principal/Vice Principalan administrative officer, Director, Assistant Superintendent of Schools or Superintendent of Schools; 5. The reports shall be written independently of each other, and the report writers shall not collaborate with regard to the results; 6. Where the Board intends to dismiss a teacher on grounds of less than satisfactory teaching situation, it shall, no later than two (2) calendar months prior to the end of a school term, notify the teacher and the President of the Association of such intention and provide an opportunity for the teacher and their her/his representative to meet with the superintendent and the Board within fourteen (14) days of such notice. 7. Where, subsequent to such meeting, the Board decides to dismiss a teacher pursuant to Section 122.1 of the School Act, R.S.B.C. 1996.

Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board may shall not dismiss a teacher under this article if: a. A teacher is in other than a teacher-teaching-on-call on the first year basis of appointment and “less than satisfactory” performance of teaching duties except where the Board board has received two at least three (23) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 C.22 (Evaluation Teacher Evaluation) of Teaching) this agreement indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. b. After a teacher has completed one (1) year of term/continuing appointment and the Board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the employee is less than satisfactory. 2. The reports referred to in Article C.22.1 shall have been be prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E.26 (Evaluation of Teaching) of this Agreement, and in accordance with the following conditionsfollowing: 3. Except for a teacher in the first year of an appointment, a. the reports are written within shall have been issued in a period of not less than twelve (12) months and not or more than twenty-four (24) monthsconsecutive months exclusive of any approved leave of absence; b. at least one (1) of the reports shall be a report of a Superintendent, excluding time off due an Assistant Superintendent, or a District Principal; c. the other two (2) reports shall include only reports of: i. a Superintendent or an Assistant Superintendent, or ii. a Director of Instruction, or iii. a District Principal, or iv. the Principal of a school to illness, leave or retraining and such period not to include the time during which the employee teacher is participating in an agreed upon plan of assistance pursuant to Article E.26.5 or assigned; d. the leave granted in Article C.22.8. 4. The reports leading to dismissal shall be written independently prepared by at least three (3) different evaluators. 3. Subsequent to the teacher receiving one (I) or two (2) “less than satisfactory” reports, the teacher: a. may request a transfer to a mutually agreeable assignment; b. may request a leave of absence for up to one (1) year for the purpose of whom taking a program of professional or academic instruction, in which case subsequent evaluation(s) shall be a Superintendent undertaken within the balance of Schools the twenty-four (24) months exclusive of the leave of absence period. Upon return to duty, the next evaluation will commence in not less than three (3) or Assistant Superintendent of Schools; the other reports more than six (6) working months. c. shall be written requested to participate in a plan of assistance appropriate to the development of an acceptable standard of performance as it pertains to the evaluation criteria. Where a plan of assistance is implemented it shall be completed before another report is initiated. 4. Upon receiving a third “less than satisfactory” report, the teacher will be given fifteen (15) days' notice of the Board meeting to be held to consider the dismissal of the teacher. The teacher has the right to attend that meeting. If attending, the teacher will be accompanied by a Principal/Vice Principal, Director, Assistant Superintendent representative of Schools or Superintendent of Schools;the Association. 5. The reports Association shall be written independently have the option of each other, referring all dismissals resulting from this Article and the report writers shall not collaborate with regard all applicable documentation to the results; 6. Where the Board intends to dismiss a teacher on grounds of less than satisfactory teaching situation, it shall, no later than two (2) calendar months prior to the end of a school term, notify the teacher and the President of the Association of such intention and provide an opportunity for the teacher and their representative to meet with the superintendent and the Board within fourteen (14) days of such notice. 7. Where, subsequent to such meeting, the Board decides to dismiss a teacher pursuant to Section 122.1 of the School Act, R.S.B.C. 1996.Article A.6.6 or Article A.6.7 –