Extensibility. As much as possible, the system should be built to adapt to varying needs, diverse audiences, changing requirements based on the users’ profile. This will be particularly important for the customizations of the software products, as one should aim at developing reusable and adaptable features rather than one-time development for a specific project. Capacity for internationalization and multi-language support are essential to the success of the solution. In this regard, the Grantee acknowledges and understands that the Fund’s intention is for the software to be deployed in various countries. The Grantee will have due regard to this goal in providing the Programme Deliverables and will, wherever possible and feasible, ensure that customization of any software is transferable and can be applied in other country contexts. In this regard, the Grantee 3 DRAFTING NOTE: Delete those which are not relevant/applicable. will continuously consult with the Fund regarding the possibility and feasibility of transferability of different functions of the customization.
Extensibility. The CFI specification supports extensibility for future device characteristics through the vendor-specific extended Query table(s). Anything not defined in the common CFI Query database is to be defined in the vendor extended tables, with the detailed structure of such tables defined by the major and minor vendor revision numbers and the associated vendor-supplied Command Set and Control Interface specification.
Extensibility. micro-ROS should be extensible with new packages the same fashion as ROS2 does. Users should be able to add new topic types.
Extensibility. The cooperation contract solution is easy to extend. If a new type of product, e.g., MAINTENANCE-AGRMT, or a new type of customer, e.g., ASIAN-CUSTOMER, is added, no existing implementations of methods need to be xxxx xx and no additional types of methods need to be introduced (such as \typeOfProduct-shippingCharge" in the sophisticated object-oriented solution). Default shipping charges apply to the new product and the new type of customer immediately. Because of inheritance, direct in- stances of MAINTENANCE-AGRMT are subject to all cooperation contracts in which the supertype of MAINTENANCE-AGRMT, object type PRODUCT, is a partner type.6 Similarly, direct instances of ASIAN-CUSTOMER are subject to all cooperation con- tracts in which a direct or indirect supertype of ASIAN-CUSTOMER is partner type.7 If for a new type of product or a new type of customer special shipping charges apply, new cooperation contracts reimplementing the cooperative method \shippingCharge" are de xxx. This is a special form of maintenance and can be handled easily as it is shown in the next paragraph.
Extensibility. The standards development process should ensure extensibility of the standards, of the tools for implementations, and of the implementations themselves. Extensibility is a necessity for all system components in order to cater for new and/or more efficient business processes and for the expanding user community.
Extensibility. The architecture of the XXX is designed to be extensible to accommodate both changes to the requirements of Europeana and also to allow the code base to be used to supply data to other services.
Extensibility. The solution is hard to extend. Introducing a new type of product, however, is much easier than introducing a new type of customer. To introduce a new type of product, MAINTENANCE-AGRMT, one big nested case-statement has to be added. If a new type of customer, ASIAN-CUSTOMER, is added, the new type of customer must be considered in every outer case-statement of the method \shippingCharge". In both situations, existing code has to be xxxx xx and recompiled. 1This statement is needed to resolve the con ict between the previous two ones.
Extensibility. A solution is easy to extend, if new types of products and new types of cus- tomers can be included without the need of modifying existing types and existing method implementations. To evaluate this criterion, we will consider the e ects of introducing a new type of product, MAINTENANCE-AGRMT, and a new type of cus- tomer, ASIAN-CUSTOMER (see: Figure 1) Ease of maintenance: A solution is easy to maintain, if a later revision of the pricing policy causes only minor and simple changes. To evaluate this criterion, we will consider the following revision of the pricing policy:
Extensibility. Pre-built integrations: dynamics • • Pre-built integrations: xxxxxxxxxx.Xxx • • Pre-built integrations: zendesk • • IVR Studio tool (note: access must be granted) • • Slack integration • • Callflow-driven integration into Xxxxxxxxxx.xxx • •
Extensibility. The WF language shall provide constructs that extend the WF syntax with optional components, elements and values. This requirement ensures that the language can be augmented with constructs for specific management duties. A commonly used approach to this augmentation is the 'include' or 'uses' primitive. As an example, syntax-modules containing specification of policies or quality of service definitions may be used to augment the syntax on demand.
