Failure to Meet Contracted Facility Capacity Sample Clauses

Failure to Meet Contracted Facility Capacity. (a) In the event that upon completion of the Dependable Capacity Tests used to establish the Initial Dependable Capacity of the Facility, the Initial Dependable Capacity is less than the Contracted Facility Capacity but is greater then the Threshold Capacity, provided that the Company pays the liquidated damages provided in Section 8.2(b) on or before the Commercial Operations Date, the Company shall, pursuant to Section 7.1.2, have the option for a period of up to three (3) Months to undertake any necessary actions to increase the Initial Dependable Capacity up to the Contracted Facility Capacity at its own cost and any increase in the Initial Dependable Capacity shall be demonstrated through testing carried in accordance with Section 7.1.2, including the obligation to give BPDB not less than twenty-four (24) hours advance notice of any such test to be carried out and to give BPDB the opportunity to be present and to observe any such test being carried out. Capacity Payments shall be made on the basis of the Initial Dependable Capacity then in effect, and if any increase in the Initial Dependable Capacity is demonstrated, Capacity Payments will be adjusted from and after the Day following such demonstration.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Failure to Meet Contracted Facility Capacity. (a) In the event upon completion of the Dependable Capacity Test used to establish the Dependable Capacity of the Facility, at the Commercial Operations Date, pursuant to Section 7, Dependable Capacity is less than the Contracted Capacity, then the Company after paying one time liquidated damage in accordance with Section 8.2(b), will be deemed to have reached Commercial Operations Date for all purpose of this Agreement.
Failure to Meet Contracted Facility Capacity. Project Company covenants that the Initial Dependable Capacity of Phase 1 shall not be less than the Contracted Phase 1 Capacity. In the event that upon completion of the Dependable Capacity Test used to establish the Initial Dependable Capacity of Phase 1 at or prior to the Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date, pursuant to ARTICLE 8, the Initial Dependable Capacity for Phase 1 is less than the Contracted Phase 1 Capacity, Project Company shall have the option for a period of up to six (6) months from the Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date to undertake any necessary actions (“Remedial Actions”) to increase the Initial Dependable Capacity to the Contracted Phase 1 Capacity at its own cost. Within 15 Days of the expiration of such period or any decision by Project Company not to undertake Remedial Actions (whichever is the earlier to occur), Project Company shall pay to GPA, as liquidated damages, an amount equal to US$280 per kW of the shortfall between the most recently determined Initial Dependable Capacity and the Contracted Phase 1 Capacity. Project Company covenants that the Initial Dependable Capacity of Phase 2 shall not be less than the Contracted Phase 2 Capacity. In the event that upon completion of the Dependable Capacity Test used to establish the Initial Dependable Capacity of Phase 2 at or prior to the Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date, pursuant to ARTICLE 8, the Initial Dependable Capacity for Phase 2 is less than the Contracted Phase 2 Capacity (but greater than the Threshold Capacity), Project Company shall have the option for a period of up to six (6) months from the Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date to undertake Remedial Actions to increase the Initial Dependable Capacity to the Contracted Phase 2 Capacity at its own cost. Within 15 Days of the expiration of such period or any decision by Project Company not to undertake Remedial Actions (whichever is the earlier to occur), Project Company shall pay to GPA, as liquidated damages, an amount equal to US$3,100 per kW of the shortfall between the most recently determined Initial Dependable Capacity and the Contracted Phase 2 Capacity. In no event shall the damages assessed under this Article 9.2 exceed [US$ 35,000,000]. Results of all Initial Dependable Capacity Tests and Dependable Capacity Tests shall be valid only to the extent such tests are performed while the Facility operates within the requirements of all Government Authorizations and the environmental permits.
Failure to Meet Contracted Facility Capacity. (a) Project Company covenants that the Initial Dependable Capacity of Phase 1 shall not be less than the Contracted Phase 1 Capacity. In the event that upon completion of the Dependable Capacity Test used to establish the Initial Dependable Capacity of Phase 1 at or prior to the Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date, pursuant to Article 8, the Initial Dependable Capacity for Phase 1 is less than the Contracted Phase 1 Capacity, Project Company shall have the option for a period of up to six (6) months from the Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date to undertake any necessary actions (“Remedial Actions”) to increase the Initial Dependable Capacity to the Contracted Phase 1 Capacity at its own cost. Within 15 Days of the expiration of such period or any decision by Project Company not to undertake Remedial Actions (whichever is the earlier to occur), Project Company shall pay to GPA, as liquidated damages, an amount equal to US$280 per kW of the shortfall between the most recently determined Initial Dependable Capacity and the Contracted Phase 1 Capacity.

Related to Failure to Meet Contracted Facility Capacity

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the NYISO OATT.

  • Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities Construction The Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Good Utility Practice. Within one hundred twenty (120) Calendar Days after the Commercial Operation Date, unless the Participating TO and Interconnection Customer agree on another mutually acceptable deadline, the Interconnection Customer shall deliver to the Participating TO and CAISO “as-built” drawings, information and documents for the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities and the Electric Generating Unit(s), such as: a one-line diagram, a site plan showing the Large Generating Facility and the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities, plan and elevation drawings showing the layout of the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities, a relay functional diagram, relaying AC and DC schematic wiring diagrams and relay settings for all facilities associated with the Interconnection Customer's step-up transformers, the facilities connecting the Large Generating Facility to the step-up transformers and the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities, and the impedances (determined by factory tests) for the associated step-up transformers and the Electric Generating Units. The Interconnection Customer shall provide the Participating TO and the CAISO specifications for the excitation system, automatic voltage regulator, Large Generating Facility control and protection settings, transformer tap settings, and communications, if applicable. Any deviations from the relay settings, machine specifications, and other specifications originally submitted by the Interconnection Customer shall be assessed by the Participating TO and the CAISO pursuant to the appropriate provisions of this LGIA and the LGIP.

  • Interconnection Customer Interconnection Facilities Interconnection Customer shall design, procure, construct, install, own and/or control Interconnection Customer Interconnection Facilities described in Appendix A, Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades and Distribution Upgrades, at its sole expense.

  • Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities The Interconnection Customer shall design, procure, construct, install, own and/or control the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities described in Appendix A at its sole expense.

  • Contract Capacity The generation capability designated for the Project shall be the contract capacity in MW designated in the Cover Sheet, net of all auxiliary loads, station electrical uses, and Electrical Losses (the “Contract Capacity”). Throughout the Delivery Term, Seller shall sell and deliver all Product produced by the Project solely to Buyer. In no event shall Buyer be obligated to receive, in any Settlement Interval, any Surplus Delivered Energy. Seller shall not receive payment for any Surplus Delivered Energy. To the extent Seller delivers Surplus Delivered Energy to the Delivery Point in a Settlement Interval in which the Real-Time Price for the applicable PNode is negative, Seller shall pay Buyer an amount equal to the Surplus Delivered Energy (in MWh) during such Settlement Interval, multiplied by the absolute value of the Real-Time Price per MWh for such Settlement Interval.]

  • Independent Capacity of Contractor The Contractor and Contractor Parties shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees of the state of Connecticut or of the Agency.

  • System Upgrade Facilities Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the NYISO OATT.

  • Interconnection Customer Drawings Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the date of Initial Operation, unless the Interconnection Parties agree on another mutually acceptable deadline, the Interconnection Customer shall deliver to the Transmission Provider and the Interconnected Transmission Owner final, “as-built” drawings, information and documents regarding the Customer Interconnection Facilities, including, as and to the extent applicable: a one-line diagram, a site plan showing the Customer Facility and the Customer Interconnection Facilities, plan and elevation drawings showing the layout of the Customer Interconnection Facilities, a relay functional diagram, relaying AC and DC schematic wiring diagrams and relay settings for all facilities associated with the Interconnection Customer's step-up transformers, the facilities connecting the Customer Facility to the step-up transformers and the Customer Interconnection Facilities, and the impedances (determined by factory tests) for the associated step-up transformers and the Customer Facility. As applicable, the Interconnection Customer shall provide Transmission Provider and the Interconnected Transmission Owner specifications for the excitation system, automatic voltage regulator, Customer Facility control and protection settings, transformer tap settings, and communications.

  • Local Circuit Switching Capability, including Tandem Switching Capability 4.2.1 Local circuit switching capability is defined as: (A) line-side facilities, which include, but are not limited to, the connection between a loop termination at a main distribution frame and a switch line card; (B) trunk-side facilities, which include, but are not limited to, the connection between trunk termination at a trunk-side cross-connect panel and a switch trunk card; (C) switching provided by remote switching modules; and (D) all features, functions, and capabilities of the switch, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the basic switching function of connecting lines to lines, line to trunks, trunks to lines, and trunks to trunks, as well as the same basic capabilities made available to BellSouth’s customers, such as a telephone number, white page listings, and dial tone; and (2) all other features that the switch is capable of providing, including but not limited to customer calling, customer local area signaling service features, and Centrex, as well as any technically feasible customized routing functions provided by the switch. Any features that are not currently available but are technically feasible through the switch can be requested through the BFR/NBR process.

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.