Figure 1 Sample Clauses

Figure 1. (a) Superstrate-based 2T device stack. (b) Cross-sectional SEM image of a
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Figure 1. Ras signaling via a Ral-dependent pathway is sufficient and required for ROS generation in T cells. A, Ras is sufficient and required for ROS generation in T lymphocytes. A total of 6 x 106 Jurkat cells were transfected by electroporation (250 V, 950 μF) with pCMV-CD20, to differentiate between transfected and untransfected cells, and empty pMT2HA expression plasmid (control) or cDNA encoding Ras signaling constructs indicated in each panel. At 48 h posttransfection, cells were stained with CyChrome-conjugated anti-CD20 mAbs. Cells were resuspended at 5 x 106 cells/ml in phenol red-free DMEM medium and loaded with 28 μM DCF for 20 min at 37°C before stimulation and ROS detection. Cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 ( ) or PMA/I (•) or left unstimulated ( ) and analyzed on a FACScan for the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of oxidated 6-carboxy-DCF in the FL1-channel, as a measurement for the presence of intracellular ROS, of CD20-expressing cells at different time points after stimulation. The ROS generation is obtained by reducing the measured MFI with the measured MFI at corresponding time points in the unstimulated, control-transfected Jurkat cells. The data shown are the mean values of three or more independent experiments. Expression of all constructs was confirmed by immunoblotting of cell lysates with anti-HA (for HA- RasV12 and HA-RasN17) or anti-Ras Abs (for RasV12, RasV12/G37, RasV12/E38, and RasV12/C40). B, Ral participates in TCR signaling. A total of 5 x 106 PB T lymphocytes from two healthy donors were stimulated for 5 min with either medium or anti-CD3 and anti–CD28 Abs ( CD3/CD28). GTP-bound Ral was precipitated, resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by immunoblotting with anti-Ral Abs and ECL (top). Total Ral expression was assessed by immunoblotting of whole cell lysates (bottom). C, Ral is sufficient and required for ROS generation downstream of Ras. Jurkat T cells were transfected with cDNA encoding Rlf, Ral, and Ras signaling mutants and assessed for ROS production as in A. Expression of Rlf-CAAX, RalV23, and RalN28 was assessed by immunoblotting of whole cell lysates with anti-HA Abs. Constructs used in A and B were assessed in the same experiments, but are split into two sections for clarity of presentation. Although our data clearly demonstrated that activation of endogenous Ral was required and sufficient for Ras-induced ROS generation, RasV12/G37 can also interact with PLCε (37), and overexpression of PLCε mimics RasV12/G37-induced...
Figure 1. Kabeer Empowerment Framework[15] Women’s Empowerment Resources Agency Achievements Human Decision -­‐ making Childhood Immunizations Social Mobility Economic

Related to Figure 1

  • LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page

  • Check Meters Developer, at its option and expense, may install and operate, on its premises and on its side of the Point of Interconnection, one or more check meters to check Connecting Transmission Owner’s meters. Such check meters shall be for check purposes only and shall not be used for the measurement of power flows for purposes of this Agreement, except as provided in Article 7.4 below. The check meters shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection and examination by Connecting Transmission Owner or its designee. The installation, operation and maintenance thereof shall be performed entirely by Developer in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Historical figures The historical amounts of the fees for the provision of gold refining services by Xxxxxxx Refinery to the Group for the two years ended 31 December 2015 and 31 December 2016 and the eleven months ended 30 November 2017 are set out as follows: For the year ended 31 December 2015 For the year ended 31 December 2016 For the eleven months ended 30 November 2017 RMB’ million RMB’ million RMB’ million (approximately) (approximately) (approximately) Gold refinery fee payable by the Group to Zhaojin Refinery 7.41 7.23 5.15 The annual cap of the fee for the provision of gold refining services by Zhaojin Refinery to the Group for the financial year ending 31 December 2017 under the 2015 Gold Refinery Agreement was RMB9,900,000 which has not been exceeded as at the date of this announcement and is not expected to be exceeded before 31 December 2017. Annual caps The Company expects that the annual caps for the annual fees payable by the Company to Zhaojin Refinery for the provision of gold refining services for each of the three years ending 31 December 2018, 31 December 2019 and 31 December 2020 shall not exceed RMB12.60 million. The above annual caps are arrived at after taking into account (i) the historical fees payable by the Company to Zhaojin Refinery for the provision of gold refining services; and (ii) the expected sales and production of gold by the Group. In view of the anticipated increase in our gold production capacity and other factors such as sales strategy having regard to anticipated gold price trend and production capability, the annual caps for the transactions under the Gold Refinery Agreement will be higher than those in the past three years. Pricing policies The processing fee per gram for crude gold with gold content less than 99% is determined by the parties to the Gold Refinery Agreement after arm’s length negotiation having regard to the price charged by similar service providers in the local market. The terms offered by Xxxxxxx Refinery to the Company shall be no less favourable than that offered by independent third party refineries to the Company. The Gold Refinery Agreement also provided that the fees at which Zhaojin Refinery provides gold refining services to the Company shall not be higher than the fees charged by Xxxxxxx Refinery on any independent third party at that time for the same type of services provided in the normal course of business and shall not be higher than the fees charged by any independent third party to the Group at that time for the provision of same type of services. The pricing policies under the Gold Refinery Agreement will be reviewed regularly and if necessary to ensure that it is consistent with market-oriented, fair and reasonable principles. Reasons for and benefits of entering into the Gold Refinery Agreement PRC laws and regulations require gold refining to be carried out at a refinery that has been licensed by the Shanghai Gold Exchange to produce standard gold bullion. The Group is not a qualified gold refinery and has to rely on other enterprises that possess the relevant licence to refine crude gold to standard gold bullion. Zhaojin Refinery is a licensed gold refinery in the PRC and has been being commissioned by the Company to refine golds since its incorporation. Given the aforesaid and after taking into account the terms of the Gold Refinery Agreement, the Directors (including the independent non-executive Directors) consider that the entering into of the Gold Refinery Agreement is in the interests of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole, and the terms thereof are fair and reasonable, and is entered into on normal commercial terms in the ordinary and usual course of business of the Company.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Job Evaluation Plan (a) The Employer agrees that no job evaluation plan pertaining to positions covered by this Agreement will be introduced without the mutual agreement of the Parties.

  • CFR 200 328. Failure to submit such required Performance Reports may cause a delay or suspension of funding. 30 ILCS 705/1 et seq.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.