Fundamental Project Decisions Sample Clauses

Fundamental Project Decisions. Before NUSCO acts on any of the matters described in this Section 2.2 (“Fundamental Project Decisions”), it shall have first received UI’s consent with respect to such Fundamental Project Decisions, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Subject to the provisions of the next sentence of this Section 2.2, UI shall be afforded at least ten (10) Business Days to make a decision concerning a Fundamental Project Decision, such time period to commence on the date NUSCO provides UI written information reasonably sufficient for UI to make an informed decision. In the event NUSCO does not receive notice with respect to a Fundamental Project Decision more than ten (10) Business Days before action with respect to such Fundamental Project Decision must be taken, NUSCO shall provide UI with notice with respect to such Fundamental Project Decision as soon as reasonably possible after receipt by NUSCO of such notice. In such event, NUSCO shall provide UI with a minimum of the time period provided to NUSCO for such Fundamental Project Decision less one (1) Business Day. Unless NUSCO receives written objection from UI providing reasonable detail and support for such objection within the applicable time period, UI shall be deemed to have consented to the Fundamental Project Decision. If NUSCO receives a timely written objection from UI providing reasonable detail and support for such objection, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process provided for in Section 11, except that each group responsible for negotiating a resolution under subsection 11.1(b) shall have only five (5) days in which to act, in order to expedite the applicable Fundamental Project Decision. Fundamental Project Decisions are:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Fundamental Project Decisions

  • Finality of Decisions There shall be no appeal from any Arbitration Board's decision. Each such decision shall be final and binding on the Union and its members, the employee or employees involved, and the Company. The Union will discourage any attempt of its members, and will not encourage or co-operate with any of its members in any appeal to any Court or Labour Board from a decision of an Arbitration Board.

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

  • CONTRACTOR’S SUBMISSION OF CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS In connection with any Contract modification, OGS reserves the right to:  request additional information  reject Contract modifications  remove Products from Contract modification requests  request additional discounts for new or existing Products

  • Undue Burden and Fundamental Alteration For any technology-related requirement in this Agreement for which the Recipient asserts an undue burden or fundamental alteration defense, such assertion may only be made by the Superintendent or by an individual designated by the Superintendent and who has budgetary authority after considering all resources available for use in the funding and operation of the service, program, or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion, including the cost of meeting the requirement and the available funding and other resources. The written statement will be certified by the determining official. If such a determination is made, the certifying official will describe in the written statement how it will provide equally effective alternate access, i.e., other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services provided by the Recipient as their nondisabled peers.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • PROCEDURE FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 28. Acceptance of this Settlement Agreement shall be sought at a hearing of the Central Regional Council of the MFDA on a date agreed to by counsel for Staff and the Respondent.

  • Project Changes 1.8.1. All changes shall be administered per the UGC.

  • Alternate Work Schedules Workweeks and work shifts of different numbers of hours may be established for overtime-eligible employees by the Employer in order to meet business and customer service needs, as long as the alternate work schedules meet federal and state law. When there is a holiday, employees may be required to switch from their alternate work schedules to regular work schedules.

  • Finality of Decision The review by an ALJ or DAB provided for above shall not be considered to be an appeal right arising under any statutes or regulations. Consequently, the parties to this CIA agree that the DAB’s decision (or the ALJ’s decision if not appealed) shall be considered final for all purposes under this CIA.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.