Funding Decisions Sample Clauses

Funding Decisions. The Oversight Committee will consider funding allocations for delivery of Foundation Services, National Services and Strategic Priority Projects for each financial year of the Agreement, based on a costing request from the relevant Delivery Partner and an assessment of the viability of delivery of the project by the Oversight Committee. The Oversight Committee may agree to reallocate funding across National Services, Foundation Services and Strategic Priority Projects, following consultation with relevant Delivery Partners. There may be circumstances where approval from Health Ministers may be needed to commit funding to an initiative in future years. If a surplus is expected for any given financial year, the Delivery Partner will advise the Parties through the governance arrangements outlined in this Agreement. The Oversight Committee will consult with the Delivery Partner on how (or whether) the unspent funds may be reinvested, in accordance with the objectives of this Agreement and subject to any applicable legislation. Where the decision to fund a new/ongoing project is made (and approved) by the Oversight Committee, the following procedures should be followed: Chairs write to the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency advising on project/work that all Parties to the IGA would like delivered and the associated funding. If in relation to the Healthcare Identifiers Service or National Authentication Service for Health, Chairs write to the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency as the contract manager for those services. If in relation to a proposed new activity, Chairs write to the Chief Executive Officer of Services Australia with high-level advice to commence negotiations as per standard procedures. If in relation to a proposed new strategic activity or the National Health Services Directory, the Chairs write to the Chief Executive Officer of Healthdirect Australia. Amendments to these Terms The Oversight Committee may by unanimous agreement of members make any amendments or additions to these terms of reference.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Funding Decisions i. The lead agency and the non-lead agency will use their standard internal procedures to make their funding decision. The non-lead agency’s funding decision will be informed by the lead agency’s panel recommendation and funding decision. ii. Because the participating organizations have different funding cycles, it is possible that some projects will have delayed start dates in order to wait until funds become available. iii. UK partners on a proposal to be funded following NSF-led peer review will be invited to submit a proposal through Je-S to allow EPSRC to fund the UK portion of the project. This submission will not be subject to further peer review.
Sample 1
Funding Decisions. Whenever awarding HUD Continuum of Care funding to or requesting funding on behalf of sub- recipient organizations, the Board of Directors shall adhere to CoC Policies and Procedures for the Review of Applications and Selection of Sub-recipients (1/17) or its successor, which is hereby incorporated by reference, including but not limited to, funding made available pursuant to the CoC Interim Rule, the ESG Interim Rule, Chapter 420, Florida Statutes, or local ordinances.
Sample 1
Funding Decisions. By virtue of LN’s 100% ownership interest in the CPI Companies and in Artist Nation, LN, LN’s Chief Executive Officer and the LN Board (collectively, the "Control Group”) will have control over, among other things, all budgets, acquisitions, divestitures, investment, capital allocation, strategy, initiatives and similar matters with respect to Artist Nation and the CPI Companies. Under no circumstances will any decision by the Control Group to fund, or to refrain from funding, or to pursue, or to refrain from pursuing, any strategy, project or initiative be considered a breach by the Companies under this Agreement or give rise to the right to terminate the Services Relationship with “Good Reason” for purposes of Section 6(e) hereof.
Sample 1
Funding Decisions. Parties acknowledge that individual agencies may need to get approval from their governing boards before they are able to provide funding.
Sample 1
Funding Decisions. Funders will fund from the top of the ranked list downward until the budget of any funding organisation is exhausted. At this point, funders may agree to skip to the next highest-ranking proposal that can be funded with the remaining budgets. The funders meeting will agree a list of proposals to fund, subject to any further internal processes required by any funding agency. At NAFOSTED, the funding recommendation will need to be approved by the Board of Trustees for final decision. No outcomes or feedback will be communicated to the applicants until all funding is confirmed by each funding agency. Final funding commitments will be detailed in the co-funding documentation between the funding partners. Funding will then be administered by each relevant agency, as per their standard processes, terms and conditions and requirements.
Sample 1

Related to Funding Decisions

  • Investment Decisions The Subadviser shall determine from time to time what investments and securities will be purchased, retained, sold or loaned by the Series, and what portion of such assets will be invested or held uninvested as cash.

  • Major Decisions (A) Subject to Sections 7.3(C) and 7.3(D) with respect to the Company, all major decisions of the Company set forth below in clauses (A)(1) through (A)(6) (“Major Decisions”) shall be subject to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and joint approval by the Advisor and Sub-advisor. For the avoidance of doubt, Major Decisions specifically exclude any decisions regarding the day-to-day operations of the Company, the decision-making authority for which has been delegated to the Sub-advisor pursuant to this Agreement. Major Decisions shall consist of the following: (1) Decisions to recommend to the Board of Directors that the Company acquire or sell Properties, Loans and other Permitted Investments; (2) Retention of investment banks for the Company; (3) Marketing methods for the Company’s sale of Shares; (4) Extending, initiating or terminating the Initial Public Offering or any subsequent Offering of the Shares; (5) Issuing press releases involving the major decisions of the Company or the Advisor or Sub-advisor or their Affiliates with respect to the business or operations of the Company; provided, that the Sub-advisor need not obtain consent to any press releases regarding acquisitions or dispositions of Properties, Loans or other Permitted Investments; and provided further, however, that notwithstanding the immediately preceding proviso, any mention of the Advisor or its Affiliates in such press releases regarding acquisitions or dispositions shall be pre-approved by the Advisor; and (6) Merging or otherwise engaging in any change of control transaction for the Company. (B) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if the Parties do not agree to any action constituting a Major Decision that is described in any of clauses (A)(2) through (A)(6) above and that has been proposed by either Party, the Parties shall meet (in person or by phone) to discuss the issue in dispute in good faith over the five-business day period beginning with the delivery of notice of the proposed action to the other Party. (C) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, with respect to Major Decisions described in clause (A)(1) above (but subject to Section 7.3(D)), (1) joint approval shall not be required, (2) the Sub-advisor and the Advisor shall discuss the proposed transaction (either in person or by phone) prior to either Party making any recommendation of the proposed transaction to the Board of Directors, and (3) the Sub-Advisor and the Advisor shall each give due consideration to the opinions of the other Party. Ordinarily, such discussions shall begin at least five business days before a recommendation is made to the Board of Directors; however, if in the sole discretion of the Sub-advisor it is in the best interest of the Company to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors more promptly, then the Sub-advisor may do so. In the event the Parties do not agree as to whether to recommend the proposed transaction to the Board of Directors, the Sub-advisor’s decision shall govern. (D) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 7.3 or any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, in all events, including Major Decisions, the Company will be managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. (E) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary (but subject to Section 7.3(D)), the Sub-advisor shall have sole authority to act on behalf of the Company regarding amending the Advisory Agreement.

  • Credit Decisions Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently of the Administrative Agent and each other Lender, and based on such Lender’s review of the financial information of the Borrower, the Loan Documents (the terms and provisions of which being satisfactory to such Lender) and such other documents, information and investigations as such Lender has deemed appropriate, made its own credit decision to extend its Commitments. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently of the Administrative Agent and each other Lender, and based on such other documents, information and investigations as it shall deem appropriate at any time, continue to make its own credit decisions as to exercising or not exercising from time to time any rights and privileges available to it under the Loan Documents.

  • Accounting Decisions All decisions as to accounting principles, except as specifically provided to the contrary herein, shall be made by the General Partner.

  • Investment Decision The Purchaser understands that nothing in the Agreement or any other materials presented to the Purchaser in connection with the purchase and sale of the Shares constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. The Purchaser has consulted such legal, tax and investment advisors as it, in its sole discretion, has deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with its purchase of the Shares.

  • Independent Credit Decisions Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall from time to time deem appropriate, continue to make its own decisions in taking or not taking action under or based upon this Agreement, any other Loan Document or related agreement or any document furnished hereunder or thereunder.

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when: a) i. such decisions are made by the data importer in entering into or performing a contract with the data subject, and

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs. B. Participation on the SAC shall not serve as a basis for the evaluation of any teacher. C. A minimum of three (3) to a maximum of five (5) teachers from each school shall serve on their school’s budget advisory committee formed for the purpose of making recommendations on the school’s general fund budget. Teacher members shall be elected by the faculty. Minutes from such meetings may be requested by the faculty and may be posted on the CTA bulletin board at the school by the Association Representative.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!