Funding Decisions Sample Clauses

Funding Decisions. Funders will fund from the top of the ranked list downward until the budget of any funding organisation is exhausted. At this point, funders may agree to skip to the next highest-ranking proposal that can be funded with the remaining budgets. The funders meeting will agree a list of proposals to fund, subject to any further internal processes required by any funding agency. At NAFOSTED, the funding recommendation will need to be approved by the Board of Trustees for final decision. No outcomes or feedback will be communicated to the applicants until all funding is confirmed by each funding agency. Final funding commitments will be detailed in the co-funding documentation between the funding partners. Funding will then be administered by each relevant agency, as per their standard processes, terms and conditions and requirements.

Funding Decisions. The Oversight Committee will consider funding allocations for delivery of Foundation Services, National Services and Strategic Priority Projects for each financial year of the Agreement, based on a costing request from the relevant Delivery Partner and an assessment of the viability of delivery of the project by the Oversight Committee. The Oversight Committee may agree to reallocate funding across National Services, Foundation Services and Strategic Priority Projects, following consultation with relevant Delivery Partners. There may be circumstances where approval from Health Ministers may be needed to commit funding to an initiative in future years. If a surplus is expected for any given financial year, the Delivery Partner will advise the Parties through the governance arrangements outlined in this Agreement. The Oversight Committee will consult with the Delivery Partner on how (or whether) the unspent funds may be reinvested, in accordance with the objectives of this Agreement and subject to any applicable legislation. Where the decision to fund a new/ongoing project is made (and approved) by the Oversight Committee, the following procedures should be followed: Chairs write to the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency advising on project/work that all Parties to the IGA would like delivered and the associated funding. If in relation to the Healthcare Identifiers Service or National Authentication Service for Health, Chairs write to the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency as the contract manager for those services. If in relation to a proposed new activity, Chairs write to the Chief Executive Officer of Services Australia with high-level advice to commence negotiations as per standard procedures. If in relation to a proposed new strategic activity or the National Health Services Directory, the Chairs write to the Chief Executive Officer of Healthdirect Australia. Amendments to these Terms The Oversight Committee may by unanimous agreement of members make any amendments or additions to these terms of reference.

Funding Decisions i. The lead agency and the non-lead agency will use their standard internal procedures to make their funding decision. The non-lead agency’s funding decision will be informed by the lead agency’s panel recommendation and funding decision. ii. Because the participating organizations have different funding cycles, it is possible that some projects will have delayed start dates in order to wait until funds become available. iii. UK partners on a proposal to be funded following NSF-led peer review will be invited to submit a proposal through Je-S to allow EPSRC to fund the UK portion of the project. This submission will not be subject to further peer review.

Funding Decisions. Whenever awarding HUD Continuum of Care funding to or requesting funding on behalf of sub- recipient organizations, the Board of Directors shall adhere to CoC Policies and Procedures for the Review of Applications and Selection of Sub-recipients (1/17) or its successor, which is hereby incorporated by reference, including but not limited to, funding made available pursuant to the CoC Interim Rule, the ESG Interim Rule, Chapter 420, Florida Statutes, or local ordinances.

Funding Decisions. By virtue of LN’s 100% ownership interest in the CPI Companies and in Artist Nation, LN, LN’s Chief Executive Officer and the LN Board (collectively, the "Control Group”) will have control over, among other things, all budgets, acquisitions, divestitures, investment, capital allocation, strategy, initiatives and similar matters with respect to Artist Nation and the CPI Companies. Under no circumstances will any decision by the Control Group to fund, or to refrain from funding, or to pursue, or to refrain from pursuing, any strategy, project or initiative be considered a breach by the Companies under this Agreement or give rise to the right to terminate the Services Relationship with “Good Reason” for purposes of Section 6(e) hereof.

Funding Decisions. Parties acknowledge that individual agencies may need to get approval from their governing boards before they are able to provide funding.