Genotyping Sample Clauses

Genotyping. MAYO will use reasonable efforts to provide LICENSEE, subject to availability, breeding records and a protocol useful in genotyping the offspring of the Stock. Any breeding records or nucleic acid probes provided to LICENSEE by MAYO under this LSRA shall be used solely for genotyping the Licensed Technology.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Genotyping. To estimate all sNP genotypes in a single chip, semi-parametric log-concave mixtures were proposed in Xxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx (2010). One reason is that the latter only works effectively on array sets of reasonable size, in order This chapter is an adapted version of the submitted article: Xxxxx, R.c.a., Xxxxxx, P.H.c. and Xxxxxxx, X.X. (2012). SCALA: a software suite for single chip sNP calibration, genotyping and copy number mapping, submitted for publication. to obtain stable estimates. Furthermore, low minor allele frequencies pose additional problems. The above is circumvented when genotypes are called for a single chip. Proposals for small sample sets have been made, also us- ing mixtures (ALCHEMY by Xxxxxx et al., 2010), as well as a combination of single and multi-array analysis (MAMS by Xxxx et al., 2007). Building on their arguments we have developed an algorithm that performs single array genotyping. It is based on a two-dimensional mixture of log-concave den- sities (along the lines of Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxx, 2007), fitted on 2-dimensional histograms (Xxxxxx & Xxxx, 2007). To estimate a mixture with three smooth components, we use the familiar EM (expectation-maximization) algorithm. Two steps are repeated until convergence: 1) split the counts y into three vectors of pseudo-counts, proportional to the current estimate of the mix- ture components; 2) apply smoothing to the pseudo-counts. Decent starting estimates for the components are needed. In Xxxxx et al. (2010) genotype calls from a multi-array method (CRLMM) and from our single-array method (SCALA) are compared to a set of consensus genotypes from HapMap. The number of agreements and differences in terms of homo- and heterozygous calls showed that SCALA can be used to call genotypes efficiently and effec- tively. Even sNPs that were not genotyped in HapMap can be genotyped with reasonable certainty using a single chip. The above model is imple- mented in the SCALA.genotype function. Visualization of copy numbers and allelic imbalance DNa in tumors can show a variety of deviations like allele copy number vari- ation (cNV) and allelic imbalance. sNP arrays provide a fluorescence signal for each allele, both of which are assumed to be proportional to the number of both alleles. sums (log(a + b)) and ratios (log(b/a)) of these signals can be plotted, on logarithmic scales, versus positions on chromosomes, to give a useful graphical representation (like in DNACopy, 2010; Golden Helix, 2011). These...
Genotyping. All samples were digested as described by Xxxxxxxxx et al (Xxxxxxxxx et al. 1994). Single strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP) of products was used for genotyping and mutation detection of all except the Scandinavian cases and relatives. A 50:50 mix of sample and 95% deionised formamide, 10mM NaOH loading buffer was denatured at 95°C for 3 minutes and snap cooled on ice. Electrophoresis was in 0.5xMDE gel, 0.6xTBE buffer at 8W and 25°C for 6 hours. Products were visualised after SSCP by silver staining. Of the 955 samples screened, 4 (all controls from Scandinavia) persistently had non-specific banding, making the gel difficult to interpret. Direct sequencing and attempts at subcloning of these samples were unsuccessful. Southern hybridisation by standard methods was used to determine the specific banding of these samples. Probe was prepared by PCR amplification of a previously sequenced sample from a control individual, known to be homozygous for the short NFH allele, and labelled by the random priming method. Filters were hybridised at high stringency. Two of these samples had band shifts consistent with deletions. Because of the difficulty in sequencing or subcloning these samples, they were electrophoresed in 10% acrylamide, visualised by ethidium bromide staining and directly sequenced from the gel. The Scandinavian cases and relatives were screened by PCR-digestion as above, followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (RFLP) by electrophoresis in 2% Metaphor agarose (FMC), 1xTBE buffer for 7 hours at 130V. Visualisation was by ethidium bromide staining.
Genotyping. Ear samples were taken from ephrin B2-/- mice at weaning and genotyping performed to establish their cre and floxed ephrin B2 status. In addition, ear samples were taken from wild-type and ephrin B2-/- mice after tamoxifen treatment to confirm successful deletion of ephrin B2. DNA was extracted using the ‘hotshot’ method described by Xxxxxx et al. (209). Cell lysis buffer (75µl) was added to tubes containing ear sample, and heated to 95ºC for 30 minutes with vortexing for 1 minute half way through incubation. Neutralization buffer (75µl) was then added to the tubes and they were stored at -20ºC. For PCR reactions, 2µl DNA was added into PCR tubes with: 12.5µl Taq PCR master- mix (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, US), 2.5µl Coral load 10x (Qiagen, Inc.), 9.5µl DNAse free water (Qiagen, Inc.), and 0.5µl primer. The PCR conditions consisted of: an initial hold-step at 95ºC for 5 mins, followed by 35 cycles of; 95ºC for 30 seconds, 63ºC (50ºC for knockout genotyping) for 30 seconds and 72ºC for 30 seconds. PCR products were run on a 3% agarose gel.
Genotyping. Blood was drawn into EDTA-containing tubes, and DNA was extracted using the Invitrogen pure clean genomic DNA blood extraction kit. Genotyping of DBH rs1611115 was performed using a validated Taqman SNP assay (C-2535789_10) from Applied

Related to Genotyping

  • Validation To validate the notice requirements outlined in Section 5.3, the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver (i) an Affidavit of Publication to meet the publication requirements outlined in Section 5.3(a) and (ii) the Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B after mailing the seven (7) day Notice to Depositors as required under Section 5.3(b).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.