Geophysics Sample Clauses

Geophysics. To date no airborne EM survey (or other airborne geophysical survey for that matter) has been conducted across the Project. The opportunity exists to identify targets across the prospective 16km strike horizon for VMS which have not been identified or evaluated. The two most useful ground geophysical surveys appear to be (i) a ground electromagnetic (EM-37) survey completed for Noranda in the early 1990’s and (ii) and an induced polarization/resistivity survey completed for York Harbour Metals Inc. in 2022. The survey was carried out in 1990 by Quantech Consulting on behalf of Noranda Exploration Company with a total of 29.1 km of EM-37 geophysical surveying from four loops. Some of the electromagnetic (EM) anomalies in the mine area that lie near the lower basalt to upper basalt contact probably correspond to the massive and semi-massive sulphide mineralisation in that area. Similar conductors occur along the lower basalt to upper basalt contact on the west side of the syncline. Induced polarization (IP) and resistivity surveys were completed by Eastern Geophysics Ltd. in 2022. In the mine area, anomalous IP chargeability appears to correspond to both the area of the massive sulphide zones as well as to the footwall rocks lying to the east. The chargeability response in the footwall rocks may be due to xxxxxxxx and disseminated sulphide mineralisation within a footwall alteration zone that formed as a result of hydrothermal fluid flow beneath the ancient seafloor.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Geophysics. Numerous geophysical surveys have been completed during the course of activity at Pxxxxx. These include regional and detailed surveys. Regional surveys include gravity and aeromagnetics. Detailed surveys run were mostly electromagnetic in nature and include IP, EM, MT, and CSAMT surveys. A brief summary includes:
Geophysics. In 1974 and again in 1999/2000, the Ontario government flew airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys over areas which include the present XxXxxx property. Magnetic maps from the two different surveys show similar features: an overall easterly trending grain, with mostly elliptical (east-trending) highs and lows (Fig. 7; ODM, 1975; Ontario Geological Survey, 2000a; b). Xxxxxx (1992) notes that the generally higher magnetic signatures in the southern part of XxXxxx Township correspond to a mapped sequence of iron-rich tholeiitic basalts. An intense, subcircular, 500 m wide magnetic high is apparent on both surveys, located in the north-central part of the XxXxxx property (Fig. 7), and recently tested by Warrior (Section 13). No significant discrete conductors were identified on either airborne survey. The map of apparent conductance shows an anomaly coincident with Whitefish Lake in the northeastern part of the property, along the Montreal River fault system. This anomaly is proximal to several surficial conductors, and is not considered by the authors to be of exploration significance.

Related to Geophysics

  • Technology Discoveries, innovations, Know-How and inventions, whether patentable or not, including computer software, recognized under U.S. law as intellectual creations to which rights of ownership accrue, including, but not limited to, patents, trade secrets, maskworks and copyrights developed under this Agreement.

  • No Reverse Engineering You may not, and you agree not to or enable others to, copy (except as expressly permitted by this License or by the Usage Rules if they are applicable to you), decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, attempt to derive the source code of, decrypt, modify, or create derivative works of the Apple Software or any services provided by the Apple Software, or any part thereof (except as and only to the extent any foregoing restriction is prohibited by applicable law or to the extent as may be permitted by the licensing terms governing use of open-sourced components included with the Apple Software).

  • Staffing Consultant will designate in writing to Authority its representative, and the manner in which it will provide staff support for the project, which must be approved by Authority. Consultant must notify Authority’s Contract Representative of any change in personnel assigned to perform work under this Contract, and the Authority’s Contract Representative has the right to reject the person or persons assigned to fill the position or positions. The Authority’s Contract Representative shall also have the right to require the removal of the Consultant’s previously assigned personnel, including Consultant’s representative, provided sufficient cause for such removal exists. The criteria for requesting removal of an individual will be based on, but not limited to, the following: technical incompetence, inability to meet the position’s qualifications, failure to perform, poor attendance, ethics violation, unsafe work habits, or damage to Authority or other property. Upon notice for removal, Consultant shall replace such personnel with personnel substantially equal in ability and qualifications for the positions and shall submit the proposed replacement personnel qualification and abilities to the Authority, in writing, for approval.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.