INTEREST-BASED DECISION MAKING Sample Clauses

INTEREST-BASED DECISION MAKING. 3:1 CEA and the District agree to continue and to expand their joint commitment to use Interest- Based Decision Making strategies and procedures at all organizational levels where decisions and problems related to this agreement occur. This is a mutual interest to both CEA and the District in maintaining a collaborative work environment. 3:2 Interest-Based Decision Making is an ongoing process that is designed to create a “win-win” situation for all stakeholders. CEA and District representatives will meet to discuss a common interest to both parties. They will follow the Interest-Based Decision Making process to solve one problem or make a single collaborative decision. This process will be used for all organizational levels of mutual interests between stakeholders. 3:3 CEA and the District agree that this collaborative process will be used throughout the school year at the building and district levels when problems (issues, concerns, misunderstandings, etc.) occur. It is the belief of both CEA and the District that problems need to be addressed quickly, efficiently and at the level closest to the problem whenever possible. The Interest-Based Decision Making process is a long-term mutual interest of both CEA and the District to help maintain productive and open communication and relationships with both parties. 3:4 As a part of this collaborative agreement, CEA and the District agree that specific decisions and problems surrounding the topics of discipline, additional staff time commitments, lack of substitute coverage, etc., need to be addressed at various organizational levels using the principles and processes of Interest-Based Decision Making. To facilitate this process, all buildings will have an Interest-Based Decision Making Team and there will be a District level Interest-Based Decision Making Team and additional teams when needed.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INTEREST-BASED DECISION MAKING. 3:1 CEA and the District agree to continue and to expand their joint commitment to use Interest- Based Decision-Making strategies and procedures at all organizational levels where decisions and problems related to this agreement occur. This is a mutual interest to both CEA and the District in maintaining a collaborative work environment. 3:2 Interest-Based Decision Making is an ongoing process that is designed to create a “win-win” situation for all stakeholders. CEA and District representatives will meet to discuss a common interest to both parties.
Sample 1
INTEREST-BASED DECISION MAKING. 3:1 CEA and the District agree to continue and to expand their joint commitment to use Interest- Based Decision-Making strategies and procedures at all organizational levels. This applies to decisions and problems related to employee concerns and this agreement. This is a mutual interest to both CEA and the District in maintaining a collaborative work environment. 3:2 Interest-Based Decision Making is an ongoing process that is designed to create a “win-win” situation for all stakeholders. CEA and District representatives will meet to discuss a common interest to both parties. 3:2.1 They will follow the Interest-Based Decision-Making process to solve one problem or make single collaborative decision. This process will be used for organizational levels of mutual interests between stakeholders. 3:3 CEA and the District agree that this collaborative process will be used throughout the school year at the building and district levels when problems (issues, concerns, misunderstandings, etc.) occur. It is the belief of both CEA and the District that problems need to be addressed quickly, efficiently and at the level closest to the problem whenever possible. The Interest-Based Decision-Making process is a long-term mutual interest of both CEA and the District to help maintain productive and open communication and relationships with both parties. 3:4 As a part of this collaborative agreement, CEA and the District agree that specific decisions and problems surrounding the topics of discipline, additional staff time commitments, lack of substitute coverage, etc., need to be addressed at various organizational levels using the principles and processes of Interest-Based Decision Making. To facilitate this process, all buildings will have an Interest-Based Decision-Making Team and there will be a District level Interest-Based Decision-Making Team and additional teams when needed.
Sample 1

Related to INTEREST-BASED DECISION MAKING

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs. B. Participation on the SAC shall not serve as a basis for the evaluation of any teacher. C. A minimum of three (3) to a maximum of five (5) teachers from each school shall serve on their school’s budget advisory committee formed for the purpose of making recommendations on the school’s general fund budget. Teacher members shall be elected by the faculty. Minutes from such meetings may be requested by the faculty and may be posted on the CTA bulletin board at the school by the Association Representative.

  • Independent Credit Decisions Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall from time to time deem appropriate, continue to make its own decisions in taking or not taking action under or based upon this Agreement, any other Loan Document or related agreement or any document furnished hereunder or thereunder.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Investment Decision The Purchaser understands that nothing in the Agreement or any other materials presented to the Purchaser in connection with the purchase and sale of the Shares constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. The Purchaser has consulted such legal, tax and investment advisors as it, in its sole discretion, has deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with its purchase of the Shares.

  • Investment Decisions The Subadviser shall determine from time to time what investments and securities will be purchased, retained, sold or loaned by the Series, and what portion of such assets will be invested or held uninvested as cash.

  • Initial Decision Maker The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker.

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when: a) i. such decisions are made by the data importer in entering into or performing a contract with the data subject, and

  • Independent Credit Decision The Assignee (a) acknowledges that it has received a copy of the Credit Agreement and the Schedules and Exhibits thereto, together with copies of the most recent financial statements of the Borrower, and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate to make its own credit and legal analysis and decision to enter into this Assignment and Acceptance; and (b) agrees that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Assignor, the Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit and legal decisions in taking or not taking action under the Credit Agreement.

  • Independent Investment Decision Such Purchaser has independently evaluated the merits of its decision to purchase the Shares pursuant to the Agreement, and such Purchaser confirms that it has not relied on the advice of any other Purchaser’s business and/or legal counsel in making such decision. Such Purchaser has not relied on the business or legal advice of the Company or any of its agents, counsel or Affiliates in making its investment decision hereunder, and confirms that none of such Persons has made any representations or warranties to such Purchaser in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents.

  • Interconnection Customer Compensation for Actions During Emergency Condition The CAISO shall compensate the Interconnection Customer in accordance with the CAISO Tariff for its provision of real and reactive power and other Emergency Condition services that the Interconnection Customer provides to support the CAISO Controlled Grid during an Emergency Condition in accordance with Article 11.6.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!