Judge. Plaintiff: Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1148 (4:21-cv-890) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiffs: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1153 (4:21-cv-891) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiff: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1157 (4:21-cv-892) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiff: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1161 (4:21-cv-893) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiffs: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile US, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1169 (4:21-cv-894) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiffs: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxx Xxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile US, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1179 (4:21-cv-895) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiff: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1181 (4:21-cv-896) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx
Judge. Plaintiff: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1321 (4:21-cv-905) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiffs: Xxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxx, and Xxxxxx Xxxxx-Xxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1324 (4:21-cv-906) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiffs: Xxxx (Xxxx) Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Captain Xxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Xx., Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1415 (4:21-cv-907) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiffs: Xxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, and Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. X.X. Xxxxxxxxxx 2:21-cv-1460 (4:21-cv-908) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx EXHIBIT B IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN RE: T-MOBILE CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION, THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS ) ) MDL No. 3019 ) ) Master Case No. 4:21-md-03019-BCW ) ) ) ) )
Judge. XxXxxxxx agrees to provide prompt, courteous, efficient, and professional services in the performance of his duties.
Judge. “Judge” means a retired judge of the Superior Court of the State of California affiliated with JAMS.
Judge. Judges shall determine scores and points assigned to individual or team competitors based on the competition criteria determined by StreetWise Drift. Judges shall furnish and distribute results of all qualifying sessions and races, as well as any special requests (i.e. timed practice sessions, etc.). Judges or other entities as assigned by StreetWise Drift will maintain records of official times, qualifying records, lap charts, and race results for all events. Judges or other entities as assigned by StreetWise Drift will also compile and distribute official results (after notification that all protests are completed and that the StreetWise Drift has declared the results “official”) for all qualification periods and races.
Judge. Whereas the form-critical approach to Xxxxxxx teaching failed to read Xxxxxxx teaching (or instruction) against the examples of education found in Xxxxx-Xxxxx antiquity, no scholar has done more than E.A. Judge, an early exponent of social history, 18 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, “Social Status, Public Speaking and Private Teaching: The Circumstances of Paul’s Preaching Activity,” NovT 36 (1984): 63. to compare Xxxx to all stages of Greek and Roman education. His most important contributions to the topic come in three major essays, titled “The Early Christians as a Scholastic Community,”19 “The Conflict of Educational Aims in the New Testament,”20 and “The Reaction against Classical Education in the New Testament.”21 Several of the most important works on early Christianity and Xxxxx-Xxxxx education published since Judge have been attempts to test the theses advanced in these essays.22 In “The Early Christians as a Scholastic Community,” Judge outlines three basic functions of early Christian groups. The first is cultic or ritual (i.e., Christians joined together to engage in religious activities, to which the elements of liturgies in the New Testament documents attest). The second function was as “agencies of social welfare.” That is, they operated not only for their spiritual concerns but also sought, to contribute positively to their communities.23 Judge notes that while these first two functions of
Judge. 5.1. I will always respect judge’s decision.
