Jurisdictional Boundaries Sample Clauses
The Jurisdictional Boundaries clause defines which courts or legal authorities have the power to interpret and enforce the terms of the agreement. Typically, it specifies a particular state, country, or region whose laws will govern any disputes arising from the contract. By clearly establishing the relevant jurisdiction, this clause helps prevent confusion or conflict over where legal proceedings should take place, thereby reducing uncertainty and potential legal costs for both parties.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. Existing jurisdictional boundaries may be helpful in articulating a boundary for purposes of nonattainment designations, and for purposes of carrying out the governmental responsibilities of planning for attainment of the lead NAAQS and implementing control measures. These existing boundaries may include an existing nonattainment or maintenance area boundary, a county or township boundary, a metropolitan area boundary, an air management district, or an urban planning boundary established for coordinating business development or transportation activities. The nonattainment area is a portion of Collin County. Surrounding counties have no lead emitting sources, and thus do not contribute to the nonattainment area in Collin County. TCEQ modeling shows that all predicted NAAQS violations fall within Collin County.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. Department extra duty work can be authorized only within the jurisdictional boundaries of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. Once EPA identified the general areas that the Agency anticipated would be included in the nonattainment area, EPA then considered existing jurisdictional boundaries for the purposes of providing a clearly defined legal boundary and to help identify the areas appropriate for carrying out the air quality planning and enforcement functions for nonattainment areas. With regard to the 2010 SO2 NAAQS, EPA has determined that the appropriate jurisdictional boundaries to be considered to include counties, air districts, pre-existing nonattainment areas, reservations, among any other information deemed relevant to establishing appropriate area designations and boundaries for the 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. No area in Hillsborough County has been or is currently nonattainment for a SO2 NAAQS, so EPA had no boundary related to a previous nonattainment designation to consider for this area. Additionally, this area does not include Indian Country. Therefore, this factor did not play a significant role in determining the nonattainment boundary.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. As defined by the US Department of The Treasury regarding disbursement of ARPA funds, the 2022 final rule clarified that recipients may transfer funds to any entity to carry out, as a sub-recipient, an eligible activity on behalf of the SLFRF recipient (transferor), as long as they comply with the SLFRF Award Terms and Conditions and other applicable requirements. UCRX agrees that all students funded with the monies provided will are within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. Once EPA identified the general areas that the Agency anticipated would be included in the nonattainment area, EPA then considered existing jurisdictional boundaries for the purposes of providing a clearly defined legal boundary and to help identify the areas appropriate for carrying out the air quality planning and enforcement functions for nonattainment areas. No area in Sullivan County has been or is currently designated nonattainment for a SO2 NAAQS, so EPA had no boundary related to previous nonattainment designations to consider for this area.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. EPA provided information about all boundaries considered prior to proposing nonattainment areas and this information can be found in the Pennsylvania TSD as part of the docket on proposed designations (78 FR 11124) and is not restated here. EPA originally proposed including all of Allegheny County in the initial nonattainment area. However additional information provided by the Commonwealth and ACHD in response to EPA’s proposal demonstrates that the monitors and sources of concern within Allegheny County are only a portion of the county. However EPA noted that the area of the county suggested for inclusion by the Commonwealth and ACHD as part of the Allegheny PA Nonattainment Area did not include potions of the county where the ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Works was located. EPA feels this source is impacting SO2 values in the county and has also included this portion of the county in the initial nonattainment area. Therefore, EPA is designating the portions of Allegheny County as identified in Table 1 as nonattainment.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. Section 1. Job Assignments. The Company will assign employees to duties in accordance with Article XIV, Section 3.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. Existing jurisdictional boundaries may be helpful in articulating a boundary for purposes of nonattainment designations, and for purposes of carrying out the governmental responsibilities of planning for attainment of the lead NAAQS and implementing control measures. These existing boundaries may include an existing nonattainment or maintenance area boundary, a county or township boundary, a metropolitan area boundary, an air management district, or an urban planning boundary established for coordinating business development or transportation activities. In EPA’s August 21, 2009 guidance memorandum, “Area Designations for the 2008 revised Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard,” EPA reiterated that the presumptive boundary for each nonattainment area should be the county containing the violating monitor. This concept was first introduced in the guidance for the 1978 lead NAAQS designations, and is described in the 1992 General Preamble (57 FR 13549). This same presumptive boundary guidance was addressed most recently in the final rulemaking for the 2008 lead NAAQS (73 FR 66964). EPA observed, however, that States have the flexibility in their recommendations to deviate from the presumptive county boundary to portions of the county containing the violating monitor, stating that any “nonattainment area boundaries that deviate from presumptive county boundaries should be supported by an assessment of several factors…,” all of which have been discussed already in this document, except for jurisdictional boundaries. The State recommended nonattainment area is completely enclosed by the city of Chicago and ▇▇▇▇ County. The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning is responsible for transportation infrastructure, land use, and long term economical development for ▇▇▇▇ County, and IEPA is responsible for all air quality regulatory programs in every county in the State.. As a result, air quality planning efforts to address the impending lead nonattainment area in Chicago should not be problematic. It should be noted that the final rulemaking for the 2008 lead NAAQS (73 FR 66964) specifically addressed transportation conformity by stating, “In light of the elimination of lead additives from gasoline, transportation conformity does not apply to the Lead NAAQS.” The State recommended boundaries for the Chicago nonattainment area are comprised of well- known streets and thoroughfares.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. The CITY is solely responsible for the integrity and correctness of its boundary utilized by the Contracting Officer with respect to the May 3, 2025 election. The CITY shall ensure the Contracting Officer possesses an accurate boundary of its territory within Bastrop County, Texas. Before the coding and programming of the ballot begins, the CITY shall review and confirm, in a method provided by the Contracting Officer, its jurisdictional area as spatially accurate or submit its correct boundary information. If changes are necessary after programming has begun, the Political Subdivision responsible will incur the cost of re-programming for all entities involved.
Jurisdictional Boundaries. For the purposes of automatic Emergency Services pursuant to this Agreement, the Parties’ jurisdictional boundaries shall not be a consideration in the provisions of Emergency Services. The closest available resource(s) and personnel shall be dispatched to an incident regardless of the jurisdiction in which the incident occurs. All necessary authorities and laws associated with emergency response are delegated to the closest responding agency as necessary to perform emergency functions.