Limitation on Design Review Sample Clauses

Limitation on Design Review. Stanford has the vested right to develop, construct and use all of its Replacement Square Footage under the Modified 2003 Rules. The provisions of this Section 6.3.9 shall apply to each architectural review process undertaken and Architectural Review Approval granted with regard to a Designated Project. Notwithstanding Section 16.48.120 (c) and other sections of the Palo Alto Municipal Code as set forth in the 2003 Rules, that authorize the City to impose requirements on development that are stricter than those set forth in a zoning district (“architectural review discretion”), and in order to carry out this Agreement, when reviewing Designated Projects the City shall exercise its architectural review discretion in a manner that does not reduce the square footage otherwise allowable on a Site except as may be required by the Modified 2003 Rules, including requirements for setbacks from roads, creeks, and residential areas; the City’s engineering review of ingress and egress to a site and of parking, pedestrian, bicycle, and motor vehicle circulation on it; the preservation of trees as required by the Modified 2003 Rules; and the location of utilities. City shall require a reduction in the size of the project because of these matters only in accordance with an applicable law the application of which requires the reduction and then only if there is no other feasible way to achieve City’s objectives in which case the reduction shall be the minimum necessary to do so. The City may require that all or some of the parking on a Site be placed underground in order to accommodate the permitted FAR, including the 25% bonus, but only to implement the creek protection policies and programs described in Section 8.3 below; provided City may not require more than one level of underground parking or underground parking outside of footprint of the proposed building. The City shall not require landscaping, design, materials, finishes, or building methods which are substantially more expensive (after adjusting for inflation) than those generally used in the Research Park in the ten year period prior to the determination. Stanford shall have the burden of establishing the greater expense.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Limitation on Design Review. Stanford has the vested right to develop, construct and use the Housing under the Modified 2003 Rules. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any of the Housing, Stanford shall obtain Architectural Review Approval. The provisions of this Section 6.4.10 shall apply to each architectural review process undertaken and each Architectural Review Approval granted with regard to any of the Housing and to any commercial space in a building containing Housing on the El Camino Sites. For Housing proposed for development under the AS1 or AS2 Alternative Development Standards in Exhibit D hereto and for substitute Sites proposed for development under housing development standards mutually agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.4.4, City shall limit its architectural review process and Architectural Review Approval (a) to a determination whether the Housing complies with such standards; (b) to approval of lighting, noise levels, landscaping and of the exterior materials and finishes of the buildings and other structures; and (c) to approval of massing, roof forms, and the site plan. The City’s authority for the approval of massing, roof forms and the site plan (a) shall not apply to the El Camino Sites if proposed for development under the AS1 Standards in Exhibit D hereto, and (b) with respect to the California Sites, if proposed for development under the AS2 Standards in Exhibit D, shall be limited to the California Avenue edge of the California Sites, and then only to the extent that the projects submitted for approval do not already approximate the horizontal rhythm of building-to- sideyard setback and façade areas of California Avenue residential properties located across the street from, or in the vicinity of the California Sites. If Stanford elects to develop Housing under any standards other than AS1 or AS2 in Exhibit D, the above-described limitations on Architectural Review Approval shall not apply, unless the parties mutually agree on housing development standards for such Housing that includes these limitations. The City shall not require landscaping, design, materials, finishes, or building methods which are substantially more expensive (after adjusting for inflation) than those generally used for similar housing projects in the City in the ten year period prior to the Architectural Review Approval. Stanford shall have the burden of establishing that the expense is greater. The City shall not deny an application for approval of Housing or directly or ind...

Related to Limitation on Design Review

  • Limitation on Out of-State Litigation - Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 prohibits a construction contract, or an agreement collateral to or affecting the construction contract, from containing a provision making the contract or agreement, or any conflict arising under the contract or agreement, subject to another state’s law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state. If included in Texas construction contracts, such provisions are voidable by a party obligated by the contract or agreement to perform the work. By submission of this proposal, Vendor acknowledges this law and if Vendor enters into a construction contract with a Texas TIPS Member under this procurement, Vendor certifies compliance.

  • Limitation on Use Tenant shall use the Premises solely for the Permitted Use specified in Section N of the Summary. There shall not be any change in use without the prior written consent of Landlord which will not be unreasonably withheld. Tenant shall not do anything in or about the Premises which will (i) cause structural injury to the Building, or (ii) cause damage to any part of the Building except to the extent reasonably necessary for the installation of Tenant’s Trade Fixtures and Tenant’s Alterations, and then only in a manner which has been first approved by Landlord in writing. Tenant shall not operate any equipment within the Premises which will (i) materially damage the Building or the Common Area, (ii) overload existing electrical systems or other mechanical equipment servicing the Building, (iii) impair the efficient operation of the sprinkler system or the heating, ventilating or air conditioning (“HVAC”) equipment within or servicing the Building, or (iv) damage, overload or corrode the sanitary sewer system. Tenant shall not attach, hang or suspend anything from the ceiling, roof, walls or columns of the Building or set any load on the floor in excess of the load limits for which such items are designed nor operate hard wheel forklifts within the Premises. Any dust, fumes, or waste products generated by Tenant’s use of the Premises shall be contained and disposed so that they do not (i) create an unreasonable fire or health hazard, (ii) damage the Premises, or (iii) result in the violation of any Law. Except as approved by Landlord, Tenant shall not change the exterior of the Building or install any equipment or antennas on or make any penetrations of the exterior or roof of the Building. Tenant shall not commit any waste in or about the Premises, and Tenant shall keep the Premises in a neat, clean, attractive and orderly condition, free of any nuisances. If Landlord designates a standard window covering for use throughout the Building, Tenant shall use this standard window covering to cover all windows in the Premises. Tenant shall not conduct on any portion of the Premises or the Project any sale of any kind, including any public or private auction, fire sale, going-out-of-business sale, distress sale or other liquidation sale.

  • Limitation on Publication The Contractor shall not publish or submit for publication any article, press release, or other writing relating to the Contractor's services for the Judicial Council without prior review and written permission by the Judicial Council.

  • Limitation on Services Except in cases of Emergency Services or Urgent Care, or as otherwise provided under this Certificate, services are available only from Participating Providers and HMO shall have no liability or obligation whatsoever on account of any service or benefit sought or received by a Member from any Physician, Hospital, Skilled Nursing Facility, home health care agency, or other person, entity, institution or organization unless prior arrangements are made by HMO.

  • Limitation on Market Access Limitation on National Treatment Additional Commitments (b) Accounting and auditing and bookkeeping services (CPC 862) (1) None. (2) None. (3) None. (4) Unbound, except as indicated in the horizontal section. (1) None. (2) None. (3) None. (4) Unbound, except as indicated in the horizontal section.

  • Limitation on Out-of-State Litigation Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 prohibits a construction contract, or an agreement collateral to or affecting the construction contract, from containing a provision making the contract or agreement, or any conflict arising under the contract or agreement, subject to another state’s law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state. If included in Texas construction contracts, such provisions are voidable by a party obligated by the contract or agreement to perform the work. By submission of this proposal, Vendor acknowledges this law and if Vendor enters into a construction contract with a Texas TIPS Member under this procurement, Vendor certifies compliance.

  • LIMITATIONS ON REVERSE ENGINEERING, DECOMPILATION AND DISASSEMBLY You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.

  • Cooperation on Safety The Employer and Union will cooperate in continuing and perfecting regulations which will afford adequate protection to employees engaged in hazardous areas.

  • Limitation on Suits No Holder of any Security of any series shall have any right to institute any proceeding, judicial or otherwise, with respect to this Indenture, or for the appointment of a receiver or trustee, or for any other remedy hereunder, unless

  • Limitation on Time to File Claims ANY CAUSE OF ACTION OR CLAIM YOU MAY HAVE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THESE TERMS OF USE OR THE WEBSITE MUST BE COMMENCED WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES; OTHERWISE, SUCH CAUSE OF ACTION OR CLAIM IS PERMANENTLY BARRED.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.