Limitations on Decision-Making Authority Sample Clauses

Limitations on Decision-Making Authority. Neither Party may exercise its final decision-making authority during the License Term: (i) to require the other Party to perform any Development activities for which it is not responsible under this Agreement or, subject to Section 5.2, to amend the Development Plan in such a way that it no longer meets the Development Plan Guidelines set forth in Exhibit B (the “Development Plan Guidelines”); (ii) to resolve any dispute as to what level of effort constitutes Commercially Reasonable Efforts; (iii) to decide to conduct, sponsor, fund or otherwise support a clinical study, including a Territory-Specific Clinical Trial or a Post-Approval Clinical Study that would materially and adversely affect the Development or Commercialization of the Licensed Product in the other Party’s Territory; (iv) to decide to pursue or not to pursue the negotiation and execution of a Third Party Technology Agreement subject to, and in accordance with, Section 3.6 hereof; (v) to require a Party to take any action that would, or fail to take any action where the failure to take such action would, violate any applicable Law, rule or regulation or infringe the intellectual property rights of Third Parties; (vi) to expand or narrow the responsibilities of the JDC; (vii) to increase or change the budget for Development Costs; (viii) to establish guidelines for the conduct by Biogen Idec of any of the Development activities contemplated under Section 5.1(b) hereof or (ix) to amend this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, subject to Section 5.2, any decision by the JDC with respect to any of the items referred to in the foregoing clauses (i)-(viii) of this Section 4.8(a) must be unanimous and, in the event of any disagreement or deadlock at the JDC with respect to any of such items, neither Party may exercise its final decision-making authority with respect to such matter during the License Term.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Limitations on Decision-Making Authority. The foregoing provisions of Section 4.4.2 notwithstanding, neither Party shall have the right to exercise its final decision-making authority to unilaterally: (i) determine that it has fulfilled any obligations under this Agreement or that the other Party has breached any obligation under this Agreement; (ii) determine that milestone events required for the payment of milestone payments have or have not occurred; (iii) make a decision that is expressly stated to require the mutual agreement of the Parties; (iv) amend any Development Plan to require the Development of any Compound other than the Development Candidate for which clinical Development was first conducted in such Development Program; (v) change or modify the Hit Criteria, Lead Candidate Criteria or Development Candidate Selection Criteria; (vi) subject to Section 6.6, decide to pursue a Pivotal Clinical Trial that does not satisfy regulatory requirements in both the United States and Europe; (vii) require or restrict the other Party from conducting Development activities specifically related only to such Party’s territory, except as otherwise set forth herein; or (viii) otherwise expand its rights or reduce its obligations under this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Limitations on Decision-Making Authority. The foregoing provisions of Section 4.1.5 notwithstanding, neither Party shall have the right to exercise its final decision-making authority to unilaterally: (a) determine that it has fulfilled any obligations under this Agreement or that the other Party has breached any obligation under this Agreement; (b) subject to Section 4.1.7, determine that milestone events required for the payment of milestone payments have or have not occurred; (c) make a decision that is expressly stated to require the mutual agreement of the Parties; or (d) otherwise expand its rights or reduce its obligations under this Agreement, including by making any unilateral changes to the Tractable Hit Criteria, the Lead Candidate Criteria or the Development Candidate Selection Criteria.
Sample 1Sample 2
Limitations on Decision-Making Authority. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 3.7 (Decisions of the Committees), neither Party may exercise its right to finally resolve a dispute: (a) in a manner that excuses such Party from any of its obligations specifically enumerated under this Agreement; (b) in a manner that conflicts with the any of the express terms or conditions of this Agreement (including any obligation to comply with Applicable Law); (c) in a manner that negates any consent rights or other rights specifically allocated to the other Party under this Agreement; (d) if the provisions of this Agreement specify that mutual agreement of the Parties is required for such matter; (e) involving the breach or alleged breach of this Agreement; (f) in a manner that would require the other Party to perform any act that would breach any obligation to any Third Party (including under any Existing Agreement or Collaboration In-License) or is inconsistent with any Applicable Law; (g) to determine whether or not a milestone event has been achieved; (h) to otherwise expand a Party’s rights or reduce a Party’s obligations under this Agreement; or (i) except as set forth in Section 3.7.4(b)(i)B (Other Decisions), Section 3.7.4(b)(i)C (Other Decisions), Section 3.7.4(b)(i)D(Other Decisions), Section 3.7.4(b)(i)E (Other Decisions), Section 3.7.4(b)(ii)B (Other Decisions), Section 3.7.4(b)(ii)C (Other Decisions), Section 3.7.4(b)(ii)D (Other Decisions), or Section 3.7.4(b)(ii)E (Other Decisions), in respect of matters specified in Section 3.7.4(b) (Other Decisions) if such matter would materially impact both the Exploitation of Products in or for the Sobi Territory and the Apellis Territory; and if the applicable matter is set forth in section 5.2.2 of the SFJ Agreement, then Sobi may not exercise its right to finally resolve a dispute with respect to such matter in a manner with which SFJ disagrees.
Sample 1

Related to Limitations on Decision-Making Authority

  • Considerations on Review In considering the review, the Plan Administrator shall take into account all materials and information the claimant submits relating to the claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination.

  • Limitations on Review Obligations The Asset Representations Reviewer may rely on the information in any Review Notice, the list(s) of the Subject Receivables provided by the Servicer, and the accuracy and completeness of the Review Materials. The Asset Representations Reviewer will have no obligation: (a) to determine whether a Delinquency Trigger has occurred or whether the required percentage of Noteholders has voted to direct an Asset Representations Review under the Indenture; (b) to determine which Receivables are Subject Receivables; (c) to confirm the validity of the Review Materials; or (d) to take any action or cause any other party to take any action under any of the Basic Documents or otherwise to enforce any remedies against any Person for breaches of representations or warranties about the Subject Receivables.

  • Limitations on Authority The authority of the Board over the conduct of the business affairs of the Company shall be subject only to such limitations as are expressly stated in this Agreement or in the Act.

  • Limitations on Re-Disclosure The Provider shall not re-disclose Student Data to any other party or affiliate without the express written permission of the LEA or pursuant to court order, unless such disclosure is otherwise permitted under SOPPA, ISSRA, FERPA, and MHDDCA. Provider will not sell or rent Student Data. In the event another party, including law enforcement or a government entity, contacts the Provider with a request or subpoena for Student Data in the possession of the Provider, the Provider shall redirect the other party to seek the data directly from the LEA. In the event the Provider is compelled to produce Student Data to another party in compliance with a court order, Provider shall notify the LEA at least five (5) school days in advance of the court ordered disclosure and, upon request, provide the LEA with a copy of the court order requiring such disclosure.

  • Procedures upon Application for Indemnification (a) To obtain indemnification, Indemnitee shall submit to the Company a written request, including therein or therewith such documentation and information as is reasonably available to Indemnitee and as is reasonably necessary to determine whether and to what extent Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification following the final disposition of the Proceeding. Any delay in providing the request will not relieve the Company from its obligations under this Agreement, except to the extent such failure is prejudicial. (b) Upon written request by Indemnitee for indemnification pursuant to Section 10(a), a determination with respect to Indemnitee’s entitlement thereto shall be made in the specific case (i) if a Change in Control shall have occurred, by Independent Counsel in a written opinion to the Company’s board of directors, a copy of which shall be delivered to Indemnitee or (ii) if a Change in Control shall not have occurred, (A) by a majority vote of the Disinterested Directors, even though less than a quorum of the Company’s board of directors, (B) by a committee of Disinterested Directors designated by a majority vote of the Disinterested Directors, even though less than a quorum of the Company’s board of directors, (C) if there are no such Disinterested Directors or, if such Disinterested Directors so direct, by Independent Counsel in a written opinion to the Company’s board of directors, a copy of which shall be delivered to Indemnitee or (D) if so directed by the Company’s board of directors, by the stockholders of the Company. If it is determined that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, payment to Indemnitee shall be made within ten days after such determination. Indemnitee shall cooperate with the person, persons or entity making the determination with respect to Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification, including providing to such person, persons or entity upon reasonable advance request any documentation or information that is not privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and that is reasonably available to Indemnitee and reasonably necessary to such determination. Any costs or expenses (including attorneys’ fees and disbursements) actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee in so cooperating with the person, persons or entity making such determination shall be borne by the Company, to the extent permitted by applicable law. (c) In the event the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by Independent Counsel pursuant to Section 10(b), the Independent Counsel shall be selected as provided in this Section 10(c). If a Change in Control shall not have occurred, the Independent Counsel shall be selected by the Company’s board of directors, and the Company shall give written notice to Indemnitee advising him or her of the identity of the Independent Counsel so selected. If a Change in Control shall have occurred, the Independent Counsel shall be selected by Indemnitee (unless Indemnitee shall request that such selection be made by the Company’s board of directors, in which event the preceding sentence shall apply), and Indemnitee shall give written notice to the Company advising it of the identity of the Independent Counsel so selected. In either event, Indemnitee or the Company, as the case may be, may, within ten days after such written notice of selection shall have been given, deliver to the Company or to Indemnitee, as the case may be, a written objection to such selection; provided, however, that such objection may be asserted only on the ground that the Independent Counsel so selected does not meet the requirements of “Independent Counsel” as defined in Section 1 of this Agreement, and the objection shall set forth with particularity the factual basis of such assertion. Absent a proper and timely objection, the person so selected shall act as Independent Counsel. If such written objection is so made and substantiated, the Independent Counsel so selected may not serve as Independent Counsel unless and until such objection is withdrawn or a court has determined that such objection is without merit. If, within 20 days after the later of (i) submission by Indemnitee of a written request for indemnification pursuant to Section 10(a) hereof and (ii) the final disposition of the Proceeding, the parties have not agreed upon an Independent Counsel, either the Company or Indemnitee may petition a court of competent jurisdiction for resolution of any objection which shall have been made by the Company or Indemnitee to the other’s selection of Independent Counsel and for the appointment as Independent Counsel of a person selected by the court or by such other person as the court shall designate, and the person with respect to whom all objections are so resolved or the person so appointed shall act as Independent Counsel under Section 10(b) hereof. Upon the due commencement of any judicial proceeding or arbitration pursuant to Section 12(a) of this Agreement, the Independent Counsel shall be discharged and relieved of any further responsibility in such capacity (subject to the applicable standards of professional conduct then prevailing). (d) The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of any Independent Counsel.

  • Limitations on Actions Any action brought under this Contract, except an action for breach of warranty, shall be brought within the shorter of the statutory limitations period and the period of three years from the date of final payment without any tolling of this statutory limitations period for any reason whatsoever.

  • PROCEDURE UPON APPLICATION FOR INDEMNIFICATION (a) A determination, if required by applicable law, with respect to Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification shall be made in the specific case by one of the following methods, which shall be at the election of Indemnitee: (i) by a majority vote of the Disinterested Directors, even though less than a quorum of the Board, (ii) by a committee of such directors designated by majority vote of such directors, (iii) if there are no Disinterested Directors or if such directors so direct, by Independent Counsel in a written opinion to the Board, a copy of which shall be delivered to Indemnitee, or (iv) by vote of the stockholders. The Company promptly will advise Indemnitee in writing with respect to any determination that Indemnitee is or is not entitled to indemnification, including a description of any reason or basis for which indemnification has been denied. If it is so determined that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, payment to Indemnitee shall be made within ten (10) days after such determination. Indemnitee shall reasonably cooperate with the person, persons or entity making such determination with respect to Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification, including providing to such person, persons or entity upon reasonable advance request any documentation or information which is not privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and which is reasonably available to Indemnitee and reasonably necessary to such determination. Any costs or Expenses incurred by Indemnitee in so cooperating with the person, persons or entity making such determination shall be borne by the Company (irrespective of the determination as to Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification) and the Company hereby agrees to indemnify and to hold Indemnitee harmless therefrom. (b) In the event the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by Independent Counsel pursuant to Section 12(a) hereof, the Independent Counsel shall be selected as provided in this Section 12(b). The Independent Counsel shall be selected by Indemnitee (unless Indemnitee shall request that such selection be made by the Board), and Indemnitee shall give written notice to the Company advising it of the identity of the Independent Counsel so selected and certifying that the Independent Counsel so selected meets the requirements of “Independent Counsel” as defined in Section 2 of this Agreement. If the Independent Counsel is selected by the Board, the Company shall give written notice to Indemnitee advising Indemnitee of the identity of the Independent Counsel so selected and certifying that the Independent Counsel so selected meets the requirements of “Independent Counsel” as defined in Section 2 of this Agreement. In either event, Indemnitee or the Company, as the case may be, may, within ten (10) days after such written notice of selection shall have been received, deliver to the Company or to Indemnitee, as the case may be, a written objection to such selection; provided, however, that such objection may be asserted only on the ground that the Independent Counsel so selected does not meet the requirements of “Independent Counsel” as defined in Section 2 of this Agreement, and the objection shall set forth with particularity the factual basis of such assertion. Absent a proper and timely objection, the person so selected shall act as Independent Counsel. If such written objection is so made and substantiated, the Independent Counsel so selected may not serve as Independent Counsel unless and until such objection is withdrawn or a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that such objection is without merit. If, within twenty (20) days after submission by Indemnitee of a written request for indemnification pursuant to Section 11(b) hereof, no Independent Counsel shall have been selected and not objected to, either the Company or Indemnitee may petition the Delaware Court for resolution of any objection which shall have been made by the Company or Indemnitee to the other’s selection of Independent Counsel and/or for the appointment as Independent Counsel of a person selected by the Delaware Court, and the person with respect to whom all objections are so resolved or the person so appointed shall act as Independent Counsel under Section 12(a) hereof. Upon the due commencement of any judicial proceeding or arbitration pursuant to Section 14(a) of this Agreement, Independent Counsel shall be discharged and relieved of any further responsibility in such capacity (subject to the applicable standards of professional conduct then prevailing).

  • Limitations on License (a) This license is not assignable or transferable by operation of law or otherwise, except upon the express written consent of the parties, but no assignment shall relieve the parties of their respective obligations as to performances rendered, acts done and obligations incurred prior to the effective date of the assignment. (b) This license authorizes performances by means of “Mechanical Music” only; this license does not authorize live performances. (c) This license is strictly limited to the theater or production venue where each Community Theatre Production is presented, and does not authorize any performances other than those made at the theatre or production venue premises. (d) This license does not authorize the broadcasting, telecasting or transmission by wire, Internet, webcasting, or on-line service, or otherwise of renditions of musical compositions in the ASCAP repertory to persons outside of the theatre premises where each Community Theatre Production shall be presented. (e) This license is limited to non-dramatic performances, and does not authorize any dramatic performances. For purposes of this Agreement, a dramatic performance shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (i) performance of a “dramatico-musical work” in its entirety; (ii) performance of one or more musical compositions from a “dramatico-musical work” accompanied by dialogue, pantomime, dance, stage action, or visual representation of the work from which the music is taken; (iii) performance of one or more musical compositions as part of a story or plot, whether accompanied or unaccompanied by dialogue, pantomime, dance, stage action or visual representation; (iv) performance of a concert version of a “dramatico-musical work”; The term “dramatico-musical work” includes, but is not limited to, a musical comedy, opera, play with music, revue or ballet. (f) ASCAP reserves the right at any time to withdraw from its repertory and from operation of this license, any musical work as to which any suit has been brought or threatened on a claim that such composition infringes a composition not contained in ASCAP’s repertory, or on a claim that ASCAP does not have the right to license the performing rights in such composition. (g) This license does not authorize any performance by means of a coin-operated phonorecord player (jukebox) for which a license is otherwise available from the Jukebox License Office. (h) This license is limited to the United States, its territories and possessions, and Puerto Rico.

  • Limitations on Use No part of the moneys delivered to the Recipient pursuant to Section II hereof is being or will be used to refinance, retire, redeem, or otherwise pay debt service on all or any part of any part of any governmental obligations regardless of whether the interest on such obligations is or was excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes unless prior approval by the Director is given.

  • Limitations on Additional Indemnity No indemnity pursuant to Section 3 hereof shall be paid by the Corporation: (a) on account of any claim against Agent solely for an accounting of profits made from the purchase or sale by Agent of securities of the Corporation pursuant to the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and amendments thereto or similar provisions of any federal, state or local statutory law; (b) on account of Agent’s conduct that is established by a final judgment as knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or that constituted willful misconduct; (c) on account of Agent’s conduct that is established by a final judgment as constituting a breach of Agent’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or resulting in any personal profit or advantage to which Agent was not legally entitled; (d) for which payment is actually made to Agent under a valid and collectible insurance policy or under a valid and enforceable indemnity clause, bylaw or agreement, except in respect of any excess beyond payment under such insurance, clause, bylaw or agreement; (e) if indemnification is not lawful (and, in this respect, both the Corporation and Agent have been advised that the Securities and Exchange Commission believes that indemnification for liabilities arising under the federal securities laws is against public policy and is, therefore, unenforceable and that claims for indemnification should be submitted to appropriate courts for adjudication); or (f) in connection with any proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by Agent, or any proceeding by Agent against the Corporation or its directors, officers, employees or other agents, unless (i) such indemnification is expressly required to be made by law, (ii) the proceeding was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, (iii) such indemnification is provided by the Corporation, in its sole discretion, pursuant to the powers vested in the Corporation under the Code, or (iv) the proceeding is initiated pursuant to Section 9 hereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!