Mobility. Each of the viable improvement concepts identified shall be evaluated from a mobility and safety standpoint. The improvement concepts shall be modeled using the traffic simulation models of the corridor segment. The following items are used only to serve as possible examples of criteria that may be used to evaluate the improvement concepts from a mobility standpoint: a) Vehicle congestion delay. b) Percent of increased travel time due to congestion. c) Average peak hour travel speed. d) Travel times from selected origins/destinations. e) Peak hour level-of-service (LOS). f) Accessibility enhancements to activity centers (qualitative). g) Crash reduction/prevention h) Impacts of alternatives on existing facilities and system effectiveness (qualitative). i) Consistency with community and regional transportation plans (qualitative). j) Discussion of future land use and transportation interactions that might influence and enhance the travel characteristics of the corridor in short or medium term.
Appears in 7 contracts
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services, Contract for Engineering Services, Contract for Engineering Services
