Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002c. Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Colorado Squawfish Recovery Plan.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Recovery plan for the California red-legged frog (Xxxx xxxxxx draytonii). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. viii + 173 pp. [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004a. Recovery plan for five plants from Monterey County, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. xii + 159 pp.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 1. Provide technical expertise and recommendations to the Biology Committee as requested (Grand Junction and Vernal field offices).
2. Participate in Biology committee meetings.
Fish and Wildlife Service. The mission of the FWS is to work with others to conserve, protect, manage, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The FWS is legally mandated to implement the conservation provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which includes responsibilities for population management (e.g., monitoring), international coordination, and regulations development and enforcement. The Migratory Bird Conservation Act and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act provide for habitat conservation mandates that include habitat protection (e.g., acquisition, enhancement, and modification of habitats). Many FWS programs are involved in bird conservation activities, including:
1. The Division of Migratory Bird Management and the Regional Migratory Bird Program offices serve as focal points for policy development and strategic planning; developing and implementing monitoring and management initiatives that help maintain healthy populations of migratory birds and their habitat; and providing continued opportunities for citizens to enjoy bird-related recreation.
2. The Division of Bird Habitat Conservation is instrumental in supporting habitat conservation partnerships through the administration of bird conservation grant programs and development of Joint Ventures that serve as major vehicles for implementing the various bird conservation plans across the country.
3. Ecological Services Field Offices across the country serve as the primary contacts for technical assistance and environmental reviews that include, when requested, projects developed by national forests involving migratory bird issues. The Field Offices coordinate with the Regional Migratory Bird Offices, as necessary, during these reviews regarding permits and overall migratory bird conservation coordination for Forest Service activities.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002b. Bonytail (Gila elegans) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Bonytail Chub Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region (6), Denver, Colorado.
Fish and Wildlife Service. (Service). KDWP may, on a case-by-case basis, request habitat management actions to maintain or improve habitat on the enrolled property. Examples of habitat management actions are listed in Section 8.3 of the SHA/CCAA Agreement. Include a description of the habitat management actions, if any, to be implemented on the property.]
Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002d. Razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Razorback Sucker Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region (6), Denver, Colorado. Utah Division of Water Rights. 1994. Policy regarding applications to appropriate water and change applications which divert water from the Green River between Flaming Gorge Dam, downstream to the Duchesne River. Policy adopted on November 30, 1994, State Water Engineer, Robert L. Morgan. Valdez, R.A., W.J. Masslich, and A. Wasowicz. 1991. Dolores River native fish habitat suitability study: Annual Summary Report, 1990. BIO/WEST Inc., Logan, Utah. Valdez, R.A., and P. Nelson. 2004a. Green River Subbasin Floodplain Management Plan. Final Report of R.A. Valdez and Associates, Inc., to Upper Colorado Endangered Fish Recovery Program. Valdez, R.A., and P. Nelson. 2004b. Colorado River Subbasin Floodplain Management Plan. Final Report of R.A. Valdez and Associates, Inc., to Upper Colorado Endangered Fish Recovery Program. Vaske, J. J. (1995). Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes Toward the Endangered Fish of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Ft. Collins, Colorado State University: 91. Williamson, J.H., D.C. Morizot, and G.J. Carmichael. 1999. Biochemical genetics of endangered Colorado pikeminnow from the Green, Yampa, Colorado, and San Juan rivers. Final Report to Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Denver, Colorado. Williamson, J.H., and R.S. Wydoski. 1994. Genetic Management Guidelines. Upper Colorado River Endangered Recovery Program, Denver, Colorado. Wydoski, R. S. 1994. Coordinated Hatchery Facility Plan: Need for Captive- Reared Endangered Fish and Propagation Facilities. Denver, CO, US Fish and Wildlife Service. Wydoski, R.S. 1995. Genetics management plan. Upper Colorado River Endangered Recovery Program, Denver, Colorado.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 1987. Final Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999b. Final programmatic biological opinion for Bureau of Reclamation’s operations and depletions, other depletions, and funding and implementation of Recovery Program actions in the Upper Colorado River above the confluence with the Gunnison River, December 1999. Mountain-Prairie Region, Denver. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2001. Ute Tribal Elder fishing pond construction and Bottle Hollow Reservoir fish screen installation. Draft Environmental Assessment prepared for the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation Ute Tribe Fish and Wildlife Department, Fort Duchesne, Utah. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002a. Humpback chub (Gila cypha) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Humpback Chub Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region (6), Denver, Colorado.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004b. Determination of threatened status for the California tiger salamander; and special rule exemption for existing routine ranching activities; final rule. Federal Register 69:47212-47248 [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Xxxxx’x blue butterfly (Euphilotes enoptes smithi) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. Sacramento, California. 26 pp. [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009. Piperia yadonii (Xxxxx’x piperia) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. Ventura, California. 15 pp.
