NETWORK GOVERNANCE. 14.1 The Network will ensure that its letters patent, by-laws or other corporate documents and its operating procedures are, and remain, consistent with this Agreement and all requirements of the NCE Program.
NETWORK GOVERNANCE spatial functionality In the late 1980s, the concept of multi-level governance was introduced in an attempt to describe the perceived increase in the involvement of sub-national regions in the implementation of EU policies.45 Above all, the concept was meant to avoid state thinking in EU theories. Empirically, the logic of territoriality at state level is still dominant in the multi-level co-operation of European, regional and state authorities.46 Conceptually however, multi-level governance is going beyond the logic of territoriality. Multi-level governance is not about geographic fixity, centrality or exclusivity, but rather about flexible, heterarchical and non- exclusive policy networks of expertise. The functional imperative of effective problem-solving, efficiency and expertise is behind this description of the European Union. Decisions are no longer taken by a central hierarchy, but emerge from the interplay between the territorial levels of government and non- governmental actors (as the word ‘governance’ denotes). Its networks blur not only the boundaries between and within states, but also of political systems through the close involvement of private actors from economic and social systems in the allocation of values. As so many actors may play a part in multi- level governance, co-ordination in decision-making and clear accountability is a difficult matter.47 Political territoriality may yet be used at the regional, national or European level as a strategy of control, but does not determine the organisational logic of the foremost function-based multi-level networks in the European Union. Both in EU and globalisation studies, the concepts of network and network governance have been introduced to describe a non-state, function- based organisation of European and world politics. Here, only a cursorily definition of a functional logic of organisation will follow. Further specification of what this logic might be, can be found in contributions on functionalism, and on functional, overlapping, and competing jurisdictions.48 Contributions on 45 Xxxxx, X., Xxxxxx, X. & Xxxxx , K. (1996), ‘European Integration from the 1980s: State- Centric v. Multi-level Governance’, in Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 34, no. 3, p. 366. 46 See, for instance, Xxxxx, I. (1999), ‘The Extended Gatekeeper: Central Government and the Implementation of EC Regional Policy in the UK’, in Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 28-45. 47 Xxxxxx, X. & Xxxxx, ...
NETWORK GOVERNANCE. The Network is a New York not-for-profit corporation. Each of your primary care physicians will be a member of the Network and, as such, will have the right to vote in the election of directors of the Network. These elections will be conducted annually in accordance with the by- laws of the Network. Each of your primary care physicians may be asked to serve on committees of the Network Board of Directors from time to time.
NETWORK GOVERNANCE. RULES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
NETWORK GOVERNANCE. 15.1 The BL-Network will ensure that its letters patent, by-laws or other corporate documents and its operating procedures are, and remain, consistent with this Agreement and all requirements of the BL-NCE Program.
NETWORK GOVERNANCE. 13.1 The Network will ensure that its articles of incorporations, by-laws or other corporate documents and its operating procedures are, and remain, consistent with this Agreement and all requirements of the NCE Program.
