Non-Arbitrable Disputes. As used in this Section 10.7, the term “Excluded Dispute” means a Dispute that concerns (A) a matter for which this Agreement assigns decision-making to the Parties or a Committee or requires the consent of one or both of the Parties, (B) the validity, enforceability or infringement of a Patent, trademark or copyright, which issues shall be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such patent, trademark rights or copyright rights were granted or arose; or (C) any antitrust, anti-monopoly or competition law or regulation, whether or not statutory.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. Section 15.1 shall not apply to any dispute, controversy or claim that concerns (i) the validity, enforceability or infringement of a SALARIUS Patent Right, trademark or copyright; or (ii) any antitrust, anti-monopoly or competition law or regulation, whether or not statutory. All such disputes, controversies or claims, and all judicial actions brought in order to enforce the instituting Party’s rights hereunder through specific performance, injunction or similar equitable relief, shall be brought only in the state or federal courts sitting in Wilmington, Delaware. The Parties hereby submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. Any Dispute that is not subject to final resolution by the Management Committee or to arbitration under this Section 1 or by law (collectively, “Non-Arbitration Claims”) will be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of New York. Each Party irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the New York and the federal courts situated in New York, over any and all Non-Arbitration Claims and any and all actions to enforce such claims or to recover damages or other relief in connection with such claims.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. Any Dispute that is not subject to final ---------------------------- resolution by the Management Committee or to arbitration under this Section 6 or by law (collectively, "Non-Arbitration Claims") will be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Each Party irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the federal courts situated in the Commonwealth of Virginia, over any and all Non-Arbitration Claims and any and all actions to enforce such claims or to recover damages or other relief in connection with such claims.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. Any dispute with respect to which a Party has final decision-making authority pursuant to Section 2.8 or other provisions of this Agreement, or any dispute between the Parties to the extent relating to the validity, scope, enforceability, inventorship, or ownership of intellectual property rights (each, a “Non-Arbitrable Dispute”), shall not be subject to resolution by binding arbitration under Section 14.2 and instead shall be resolved in a court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction located in Switzerland.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. Notwithstanding anything in this Exhibit G to the contrary, the following matters are not subject to arbitration under this Exhibit G unless the Parties otherwise agree in writing: any Dispute between the Parties that is subject to adjudication or determination by a government regulatory agency, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Railroad Commission of Texas or the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. (a) Any dispute with respect to which a Party has final decision-making authority pursuant to Section 2.5(b) or other provisions of this Agreement, and any Determination Dispute, will not be subject to resolution by binding arbitration under Section 14.3.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. Section 11.1 shall not apply to any dispute, controversy or claim that concerns (A) the validity, enforceability or infringement of a Patent, trademark or copyright; or (B) any antitrust, anti-monopoly or competition law or regulation, whether or not statutory. All such disputes, controversies or claims, and all judicial actions brought in order to enforce the instituting Party’s rights hereunder through specific performance, injunction or similar equitable relief, shall be brought before any court having jurisdiction.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. Section 12.1 shall not apply to any dispute, controversy or claim that concerns (A) the validity, enforceability or infringement of a Patent, trademark or copyright; or (B) any antitrust, anti-monopoly or competition law or regulation, whether or not statutory. All such disputes, controversies or claims, and all judicial actions brought in order to enforce the instituting Party's rights hereunder through specific performance, injunction or similar equitable relief, shall be brought only in the state or federal courts sitting in Cook County, Illinois. The Parties hereby submit to the exclusive jurxxxxction of such courts.
Non-Arbitrable Disputes. Section 11.1 shall not apply to any dispute, controversy or claim that concerns (A) the validity, enforceability or infringement of a Patent, trademark or copyright; or (B) any antitrust, anti-monopoly or competition law or regulation, whether or not statutory. All such disputes, controversies or claims, and all judicial actions brought in order to enforce the instituting Party's rights hereunder through specific performance, injunction or similar equitable relief, shall be brought only in the state or federal courts sitting in New York, New York. The Parties hereby submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts.
