Notice and Discussion of Major Changes Sample Clauses

Notice and Discussion of Major Changes. The Board and the PREA agree to take responsibility and be held accountable for the improvement of the quality of teaching and learning. It is the parties’ belief that actively and constructively involving all teachers contributes significantly towards achieving these goals. When a major change is proposed that directly impacts current teaching practices or involves implementation of new initiatives, teachers affected by the proposed change will be notified in writing of the specific changes being considered. A meeting for discussion of the proposals will be scheduled between the affected teachers and district-level administrators prior to implementation. Major changes shall refer to those required by federal, state, or district mandates (e.g., RtI, special education, common core standards, etc.).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Notice and Discussion of Major Changes

  • Results and Discussion Table 1 (top) shows the root mean square error (RMSE) between the three tests for different numbers of topics. These results show that all three tests largely agree with each other but as the sample size (number of topics) decreases, the agreement decreases. In line with the results found for 50 topics, the randomization and bootstrap tests agree more with the t-test than with each other. We looked at pairwise scatterplots of the three tests at the different topic sizes. While there is some disagreement among the tests at large p-values, i.e. those greater than 0.5, none of the tests would predict such a run pair to have a significant difference. More interesting to us is the behavior of the tests for run pairs with lower p-values. ≥ Table 1 (bottom) shows the RMSE among the three tests for run pairs that all three tests agreed had a p-value greater than 0.0001 and less than 0.5. In contrast to all pairs with p-values 0.0001 (Table 1 top), these run pairs are of more importance to the IR researcher since they are the runs that require a statistical test to judge the significance of the per- formance difference. For these run pairs, the randomization and t tests are much more in agreement with each other than the bootstrap is with either of the other two tests. Looking at scatterplots, we found that the bootstrap tracks the t-test very well but shows a systematic bias to produce p-values smaller than the t-test. As the number of topics de- creases, this bias becomes more pronounced. Figure 1 shows a pairwise scatterplot of the three tests when the number of topics is 10. The randomization test also tends to produce smaller p-values than the t-test for run pairs where the t- test estimated a p-value smaller than 0.1, but at the same time, produces some p-values greater than the t-test’s. As Figure 1 shows, the bootstrap consistently gives smaller p- values than the t-test for these smaller p-values. While the bootstrap and the randomization test disagree with each other more than with the t-test, Figure 1 shows that for a low number of topics, the randomization test shows less noise in its agreement with the bootstrap com- Figure 1: A pairwise comparison of the p-values less than 0.25 produced by the randomization, t-test, and the bootstrap tests for pairs of TREC runs with only 10 topics. The small number of topics high- lights the differences between the three tests. pared to the t-test for small p-values.

  • Notice and Disclaimer 2.1. The Data is the property of Xxx Xxxxxxxx and is protected by applicable copyright law. In no event shall User publish, retransmit, display, redistribute, or otherwise reproduce any or all of the Data in any format to anyone, except as allowed in Section 1 of this agreement.

  • MEET AND DISCUSS A. Upon request of either party, the Chancellor and/or designees of the Chancellor shall during the term of this Agreement meet with a committee appointed by the Association for the purpose of discussing matters necessary to the implementation of this Agreement.

  • DISCHARGE AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 8.01 Management shall not take disciplinary action without first warning the employee, unless the circumstances justify immediate suspension or discharge. In the event of a claim that an employee has been discharged or suspended unjustly or unreasonably, the grievance shall be filed at Step Three (3) of the grievance procedure within five (5) working days.

  • Consultations and Dispute Settlement 1. The provisions of Articles XXII and XXIII of GATT 1994 as elaborated and applied by the Dispute Settlement Understanding shall apply to consultations and the settlement of disputes under this Agreement, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.

  • SUSPENSION AND DISCIPLINE 29.01 When an employee is suspended or discharged from duty, the Employer undertakes to notify the employee in writing, with a copy to the Association, of the reason for such suspension or discharge. The Employer shall endeavour to give such notification at the time of suspension or discharge.

  • Effective Date Term Termination and Disconnection 3.1 Effective Date 3.2 Term of Agreement 3.3 Termination

  • DISCIPLINE, SUSPENSION AND DISCHARGE 14.01 The Employer shall not discipline, suspend or discharge any employee except for just cause.

  • DISMISSAL, SUSPENSION AND DISCIPLINE 13 11.1 Procedure 13 11.2 Dismissal and Suspension 13 11.3 Burden of Proof 13 11.4 Right to Grieve Other Disciplinary Action 13 11.5 Personnel File 13 11.6 Right to Have Union Representative Present 14 11.7 Abandonment of Position 14 11.8 Probation 14 11.9 Employee Investigations 15 ARTICLE 12 - SENIORITY 15 12.1 Seniority Defined 15 12.2 Seniority List 16 12.3 Loss of Seniority 16 12.4 Re-Employment 17 12.5 Bridging of Service 17 12.6 Same Seniority 17 ARTICLE 13 - LAYOFF AND RECALL 17 13.1 Definition of a Layoff 17 13.2 Pre-Layoff Canvass 17 13.3 Layoff 18 13.4 Bumping 18 13.5 Recall 19 13.6 Advance Notice 19 13.7 Grievance on Layoffs and Recalls 19 13.8 Worksite Closure 19 ARTICLE 14 - HOURS OF WORK 20 14.1 Definitions 20 14.2 Hours of Work 20 14.3 Rest Periods 21 14.4 Meal Periods 22 14.5 Flextime 22 14.6 Staff Meetings 22 (ii) 14.7 Standby Provisions 22 14.8 Conversion of Hours 23 ARTICLE 15 - SHIFTS 23 15.1 Exchange of Shifts 23 15.2 Shortfall of Shifts 23 15.3 Short Changeover Premium 23 15.4 Split Shifts 23 15.5 Work Schedules 23 ARTICLE 16 - OVERTIME 24 16.1 Definitions 24 16.2 Overtime Entitlement 24 16.3 Recording of Overtime 24 16.4 Sharing of Overtime 24 16.5 Overtime Compensation 24 16.6 No Layoff to Compensate for Overtime 24 16.7 Right to Refuse Overtime 25 16.8 Callback Provisions 25 16.9 Rest Interval 25 16.10 Overtime for Part-Time Employees 25 16.11 Authorization and Application of Overtime 25 ARTICLE 17 - HOLIDAYS 26 17.1 Paid Holidays 26 17.2 Holiday Falling on Saturday or Sunday 26 17.3 Holiday Falling on a Day of Rest 26

  • CLASS ACTION AND JURY TRIAL WAIVER Each party to this Agreement may bring a Dispute against the other only in its individual capacity and not as a plaintiff or class member in any purported class or representative proceeding. Each party gives up or waives any right it may have to have any Disputes between them resolved by a jury.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.