Objectives of D5 Sample Clauses

Objectives of D5. 2 This report is the next step in the planned evaluation of the BlogForever platform. The longer-term objective is to validate the entire system, through a combination of test cases and stress-testing the BlogForever platform. Third parties’ needs, observations, contributions and relevant feedback are analysed within this deliverable. The work within D5.2 represents the reports of the data manually collected for case studies 1 – 6, including data for two small case studies (1 & 2), three medium-size case studies (3, 4 & 5) and a large case study (6). The manual collection of data is being done with questionnaires, direct observations of users and structured interviews. The work is planned as a programme of continual improvement, testing several versions of the platform (BF1, BF3, BF5 and BF6). It occurs in planned phases; at the same time, parts of the software are developed and implemented. Implementation of the case studies takes place in three rounds, depending directly on the availability of each iteration, within the new developed platform (BF1, BF3, BF5 and BF6). The results of these tests provide an initial evaluation on those developed components. Any issues identified during these processes, are to be overcome within new alterations of the platform. This report does not reflect the current state of the operation; it simply describes the issues and suggestions identified during the different testing phases. A summary of the case studies designed by D5.1 and Description of Work (DOW) [1] is as follows: Table 1 - Case Studies Summary Details ID Nature Blog Count Domain & Content Work Period Leader 1 Small & simple 58 Higher & Further Education UK July - Nov 2012 UL 2 Small & simple 70 Higher & Further Education UK July - Nov 2012 UW 3 Small & complex 356 Multilingual focused Oct 2012 - Mar 2013 CW 4 Small & complex 1,000 Multimedia focused Jan - Apr 2013 Phaistos 5 Large & complex 2,000 Wide range of topics May – August 2013 Populis 6 Large & complex 500,000 Wide range of topics May – August 2013 Populis This report's primary function is to summarise all the relevant feedback gathered through all the tests performed from September 2012. Implementation of the case studies was placed within several rounds. The first round subjected the spider and repository prototypes to testing separately according to the specified case studies of T5.1 (Case Study 1 & 2).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Objectives of D5

  • Objectives of Agreement The objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • OBJECTIVES OF THE AGREEMENT 7.1 The parties agree that key objectives of this agreement are;

  • Objectives of this Agreement The objectives of this agreement are as follows:

  • Objectives and Commitments 7.1 The Objectives of the Parties to this Agreement are:

  • Objectives and Principles Article 1

  • Goals and Objectives of the Agreement Agreement Goals The goals of this Agreement are to: ● Reduce wildfire risk related to the tree mortality crisis; ● Provide a financial model for funding and scaling proactive forestry management and wildfire remediation; ● Produce renewable bioenergy to spur uptake of tariffs in support of Senate Bill 1122 Bio Market Agreement Tariff (BioMat) for renewable bioenergy projects, and to meet California’s other statutory energy goals; ● Create clean energy jobs throughout the state; ● Reduce energy costs by generating cheap net-metered energy; ● Accelerate the deployment of distributed biomass gasification in California; and ● Mitigate climate change through the avoidance of conventional energy generation and the sequestration of fixed carbon from biomass waste. Ratepayer Benefits:2 This Agreement will result in the ratepayer benefits of greater electricity reliability, lower costs, and increased safety by creating a strong market demand for forestry biomass waste and generating cheap energy. This demand will increase safety by creating an economic driver to support forest thinning, thus reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfire and the associated damage to investor-owned utility (IOU) infrastructure, such as transmission lines and remote substations. Preventing this damage to or destruction of ratepayer-supported infrastructure lowers costs for ratepayers. Additionally, the ability of IOUs to use a higher- capacity Powertainer provides a much larger offset against the yearly billion-dollar vegetation management costs borne by IOUs (and hence by ratepayers). The PT+’s significant increase in waste processing capacity also significantly speeds up and improves the economics of wildfire risk reduction, magnifying the benefits listed above. The PT+ will directly increase PG&E’s grid reliability by reducing peak loading by up to 250 kilowatt (kW), and has the potential to increase grid reliability significantly when deployed at scale. The technology will provide on-demand, non- weather dependent, renewable energy. The uniquely flexible nature of this energy will offer grid managers new tools to enhance grid stability and reliability. The technology can be used to provide local capacity in hard-to-serve areas, while reducing peak demand. Technological Advancement and Breakthroughs:3 This Agreement will lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers to the achievement of California’s statutory energy goals by substantially reducing the LCOE of distributed gasification, helping drive uptake of the undersubscribed BioMAT program and increasing the potential for mass commercial deployment of distributed biomass gasification technology, particularly through net energy metering. This breakthrough will help California achieve its goal of developing bioenergy markets (Bioenergy Action Plan 2012) and fulfil its ambitious renewable portfolio standard (SB X1-2, 2011-2012; SB350, 2015). The PT+ will also help overcome barriers to achieving California’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction (AB 32, 2006) and air quality improvement goals. It reduces greenhouse gas and criteria pollutants over three primary pathways: 1) The PT+’s increased capacity and Combined Heat and Power (CHP) module expand the displacement of emissions from conventional generation; 2) the biochar offtake enables the sequestration of hundreds of tons carbon that would otherwise have been released into the atmosphere; and 3) its increased processing capacity avoids GHG and criteria emissions by reducing the risk of GHG emissions from wildfire and other forms of disposal, such as open pile burning or decomposition. The carbon sequestration potential of the biochar offtake is particularly groundbreaking because very few technologies exist that can essentially sequester atmospheric carbon, which is what the PT+ enables when paired with the natural forest ecosystem––an innovative and groundbreaking bio-energy technology, with carbon capture and storage. Additionally, as noted in the Governor’s Clean Energy Jobs Plan (2011), clean energy jobs are a critical component of 2 California Public Resources Code, Section 25711.5(a) requires projects funded by the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to result in ratepayer benefits. The California Public Utilities Commission, which established the EPIC in 2011, defines ratepayer benefits as greater reliability, lower costs, and increased safety (See CPUC “Phase 2” Decision 00-00-000 at page 19, May 24, 2012, xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx/PublishedDocs/WORD_PDF/FINAL_DECISION/167664.PDF). 3 California Public Resources Code, Section 25711.5(a) also requires EPIC-funded projects to lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the state’s statutory and energy goals. California’s energy goals. When deployed at scale, the PT+ will result in the creation of thousands of jobs across multiple sectors, including manufacturing, feedstock supply chain (harvesting, processing, and transportation), equipment operation, construction, and project development. Additional Co-benefits: ● Annual electricity and thermal savings; ● Expansion of forestry waste markets; ● Expansion/development of an agricultural biochar market; ● Peak load reduction; ● Flexible generation; ● Energy cost reductions; ● Reduced wildfire risk; ● Local air quality benefits; ● Water use reductions (through energy savings); and ● Watershed benefits.

  • Objectives and Scope 1. The Parties confirm their joint objective of strengthening their relations by developing their political dialogue and reinforcing their cooperation.

  • Objectives The objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Specific Objectives In accordance with Articles 34 and 35 of the Cotonou Agreement, the specific objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Objective The objective of this Agreement is to create a free and open investment regime in ASEAN in order to achieve the end goal of economic integration under the AEC in accordance with the AEC Blueprint, through the following:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.