Odour. Entry Gas shall have no odour which might cause National Grid Gas to contravene the Legal Requirement or gas industry practice not to distribute any gas which does not possess a distinctive and characteristic odour.
Odour. 6.9 Applications to keep a pet will require to meet the following criteria:
Odour. 3.3.1 The Project will not involve any earthworks that release soil gases hence no odour impact is anticipated.
Odour. I. The odour of the paint supplied, must not be excessively pungent or disagreeable both in the container and during application
Odour. To minimize potential odour emissions, if dredged sediment is anticipated to be placed on barge for more than a day the load shall be properly covered as far as practicable to minimise the exposed area and potential odour; and If dredged sediment is found to be malodorous it shall be removed from site as soon as possible within one hour after the barge being filled up. EM&A Programme Good site practice to control dust and odour impact to the nearby sensitive receivers Contractor Construction Work Sites (General) Contractor Construction Work Sites (General) Construction Phase Construction Phase Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation EIAO-TM
Odour. 2.7 The gas shall contain a stenching agent as required by the Gas Safety (Management) Regulations Schedule 3 Pressure
Odour a. Foul smelling ammonia (20); b. Pleasant i. Symptom reports (1 ns; 2 ns) Not assessed Exp 2 a,e (B) (40, U/K,U/K) smelling niaouli (20) 2. Conditioning: a. Odour + CO2 trials and room air trials (20); b. Odour trials and CO2 trials (20)
Odour. Within each group i. Total symptom score (1 ns; Conditioning x Odour al. (2003) RCT olds participants were exposed to 2 higher in response to odour i. Higher in response to the a,e (B+W) (32, foul smelling ammonia and paired with CO2 compared to odour paired with CO2 when U/K,15.6) pleasant smelling niaouli room air, p<.05) this was ammonia (p<.05) 2. Conditioning: a. Ammonia ii. Arousal (1 ns; 2 ns) ii-vii. ns paired with CO2 breathing iii. Respiratory (1 ns; 2 ns) Conditioning x Verbal task, Xxxxxxx paired with iv. Cardiac (1 ns; 2 ns) symptom suggestions room air breathing task (16); v. Tingling (1 ns; 2 ns) i+iii+iv+vi. Higher following b. Ammonia paired with vi. Unclassified (1 ns; 2 ns) odour which was paired with room air breathing task, vii. Dummy (1 ns; 2 ns) CO2 when given symptom Niaouli paired with CO2 suggestions (i, p<.01; breathing task (16) iii+iv+vi, p<.05) ii+v+vii. ns No other interactions assessed Note: RCT = Randomised Controlled Trial, B = Between subjects design, W = Within subjects design, U/K= Unknown, ns = non-significant, italicised = not directly given but has been extrapolated from the available data, rTMS = Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, CO2 = Carbon dioxed, O2 = Oxygen, a = high risk random sequence generation bias, b = high risk allocation concealment bias, c = high risk blinding of participants and personnel bias, e = did not mention an a priori sample size calculation , Not assessed = did not assess interactions with another risk factor Table 2-2 The effect of perceived dose manipulation on symptom development in response to an inert exposure. Reference and quality Study design Population (N, Mean age, %Male) Inert exposure Experimental conditions (n) Main effect on symptoms measured Interaction(s) with other risk factors Bayer et al. (1991) e RCT (B+W) Unemployed Men (100, U/K, 100.0) Sham electrical shock a. Within each group the stimulator setting increased from 0 to 80 mA i. Mean pain ratings (increased with greater sham stimulation, p<.001) No significant interactions with symptom suggestion Bayer et al. (1998) a,e RCT (B+W) Job seekers (62, U/K, 82.0) Sham electrical shock a. Within each group the stimulator setting increased in steps of 10 every 5 minutes till it reached 50 i. Number of subjects reporting pain (ns) ii. Mean maximal pain rating (ns) iii. Subjects reporting pain over analgesic threshold (ns) iv. Pain intensity rating over time (Increased, difference between stimulator settings, p<.01) P...
Odour. The customer shall utilize reasonable commercial efforts necessary to mitigate odour issues in the City’s system caused by the Customer’s Wastewater discharged at the Wastewater Discharge Point.
