of S Sample Clauses

of S. Con. Res. 11 (114th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2016, shall not apply to legislation for which the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate has exercised the authority under paragraph (1).

of S. Res. 27 provided that the leaders could appoint the committees, although the Senate instead agreed to resolutions listing the membership of committees. The language authorizing the leaders to appoint committees is the same as in S.Res. 8 in the 107th Congress, and in that Congress the leaders appointed the committees ( Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 147 [January 25, 2001] pp. S558 -559). In the event the Senate ceases to be equally divided in the 117th Congress, the Senate will have to determine if this provision applies to Senators appointed to committees for the first time by resolution. The resolution further provides that budgets and office space for all committees are equally divided.14 It allows up to an additional 10% to be allocated for administrative expenses, “to be determined by the Committee on Rules and Administration, with the total administrative expenses allocation for all committees not to exceed historic levels.”15 At the time the resolution was agreed to by unanimous consent, the minority leader announced it was the “expectation that the details of those arrangements will be negotiated and agreed to by the respective chair and ranking member, in consultation with other members of each committee.”16 The only change to internal committee procedure concerns subcommittee tie votes. In the Senate and its committees, a question is rejected on a tie vote. S.Res. 27 grants the full committee chair of any committee the authority to discharge a subcommittee from consideration of “any Legislative or Executive Calendar item” that the subcommittee has not reported to the full committee because of a tie vote.17 Without this provision, discharging a subcommittee could have required a vote by the full committee—and if the full committee tied on that vote, the matter would have had to remain in subcommittee.18 Not all Senate committees refer items to subcommittees for formal consideration. The public action of some subcommittees is limited to holding hearings. In addition, a Senate committee chair or majority might choose not to refer a matter to subcommittee if it is not expected to receive bipartisan support.19 14 This provision is identical to one included in S.Res. 8, 107th Congress. Several press stories discussed the challenges associated with implementing the earlier equal budget and space agreement. See Xxxx Xxxx and Xxxx Xxxxxxx, “ Xxxxxx Digs in Over Intelligence Battle,” Roll Call, February 8, 2001, p. 3; and Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, “ Senate...

of S. Hamer; Part of Cwm Quarrell (117a. 2r. 2p.) of Edward Price; Tyn y Berth (106a. 1r.

of S. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xxxxxx Fan, 10.2 3 Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xxxxxx Fan, 3 Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xxxxxx Fan, 3 Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 ACDC, Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xxxxxx Fan, 10.3 5 Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xxxxxx Fan, 5 Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 ACDC, Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xxxxxx Fan, 5 Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xxxxxx Fan, 10.4 2 Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xxxxxx Fan, 2 Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 ACDC, Inc. U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11 Dust Handling System 11.1

of S. L. 2001-424 directed Biotech and the Attorney General to craft a profit sharing agreement

of S. California, Inc. x. Xxxxxxx-Xxxxx, 572 F.3d 644, 659 (9th Cir. 2009). “Where a 3 party demonstrates both the likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable 4 injury, ‘it almost always will be the case that the public interest will favor’ the 5 issuance of an injunction.” Jews For Xxxxx x. Xxxxxxx, 993 X. Xxxx. 282, 6 312 (D.N.J. 1998). 7 Here, the public has an interest in seeing companies like InterDigital, that 8 own SEPs, comply with their obligations to offer licenses to alleged SEPs at fair 9 rates. See Broadcom Corp., 501 F.3d at 308–14 (explaining how industry standard- 10 setting can enhance consumer welfare by increasing competition, preventing patent 12 Corp., 511 F.3d 535, 551 (6th Cir. 2007) (granting injunction based on the “general 13 public interest in the enforcement of voluntarily assumed contract obligations”). 14 The public also has an interest to see technology companies and manufacturers 15 design and innovate products, but InterDigital’s interference with u-blox’s customer 16 relationships, and prospective customer relationships, will disrupt the supply chain. 17 The issuance of this injunction will thus allow u-blox to pursue a FRAND rate, 18 without the disruption of its relationships with customers and its business. It will 19 also prevent u-blox from being wrongfully pressured into an unfair and non- 20 FRAND license.

of S. I. No. 445 of 2000 gives the Commission a number of duties in relation to ESB Power Generation (PG) and ESB Public Electricity Supply (PES); namely:

of S. An shall be granted sick pay when he is to perform his duties because of illness or provided that:

of S. D. CAL., Case No. 13-CV-0261-BEN (DHB) (the "FCA Claim") intends to refile any suit with respect to the FCA Claim or the payment of the Puna Cash Grant.

of S. 315.02 defines "port facilities" to include, without limitation, bridges. And subsection (5) of s. 315.03, F.S., specifically authorizes port authorities "[t]o construct any bridge, tunnel, road or causeway, or any combination thereof, to, from or between any port facilities." Subsection (18) of s. 315.03, authorizes port authorities to contract with the State of Florida or any agency or instrumentality thereof with reference to any of the powers granted therein. And subsection (19) of s. 315.03, authorizes port authorities to perform any of the acts authorized by contract. The Department of Transportation clearly has the authority to construct bridges in the State of Florida absent other impediments. See generally Ch. 84-309, Laws of Florida, amending the Florida Transportation Code. Section 11 of Ch. 84-309, creating s. 334.044, F.S., grants to the Department of Transportation the authority "[t]o designate existing, and to plan proposed, transportation facilities as part of the state highway system, and to construct, maintain and operate such facilities." And see s. 9 of Ch. 84-309 adding a new subsection (28) to s. 334.03, F.S., which defines "transportation facility" to mean "[a]ll means for the transportation of people and property from place to place constructed, operated, or maintained in whole or part from