The Challenges Sample Clauses

The Challenges. The Product/Solution should solve business challenges for one of the following three areas within the payment landscape: ● Challenge #1: Advancing Next-Gen Payment experiences ● Challenge #2: Empowering merchants and SMEs ● Challenge #3: Unlocking new payment flows ● Challenge #4: Building a smart and sustainable future ● Challenge #5: Embedded Finance
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Challenges. The Parties acknowledge the following:
Sample 1Sample 2
The Challenges. The Product/Solution should solve business challenges for one of the following three areas within the payment landscape in Bulgaria or Greece: ● Challenge #1: Advancing Next-Gen Payment experiences ● Challenge #2: Empowering SMEs ● Challenge #3: Unlocking new payment flows ● Challenge #4: Building a smart and sustainable future ● Phase 1: 20 Jan - 14 March: Applications submission and invitation by the Organizer/ Visa ● Phase 2: Review and Selection ○ 14 March - 31 March 2022 - Program fintechs review and shortlisting ○ 7 April 2022 – Selection Day ○ 14 April 2022 – Kick Off ● Phase 3: Main Program Curriculum and PoC Support ○ May 2022 - October 2022 - Discovery Days, Design Sprints, Work with Mentors, Experts, Clients and PoC Partners, PoC Support ● Phase 4: November 2022 - Demo Day The timelines above are indicative and the Organizer reserves the right to amend or modify the Program calendar if the circumstances require such changes. In such a case, the amendment or modification of the Program will be published on the Website.
Sample 1
The Challenges. Buffalo City has very few waste diversion activities driven by the public sector. The Call-2-Action Initiative (launched in 2016 by businesses in the city and led by the Border-Kei Chamber of Business) included waste management activities in their aim to improve living conditions in the city, although much of the focus was on litter cleaning and beautifying, with four sites for recycling also identified. At the time, Buffalo City had no operational public drop-off facilities and the bulk of the waste generated in the municipality was going to landfill. Some of the challenges that hampered the establishment of recycling facilities in the municipality were: • Availability of land; • capacity within the municipality for operation of a drop-off/recycling facility • limited understanding of the economic viability of recycling operations. • lack of infrastructure for recycling, In 2021, the non-profit company Polyco, a plastic focused producer responsibility organisation (PRO), agreed to partner with Buffalo City and the Border-Kei Chamber of Business to implement a solution that would improve the collection of recyclables, and increase the recycling capacity in Buffalo City. The Buffalo City Development Agency, Border Kei Chamber of Business and Polyco partnered to pilot the establishment of hybrid drop-off and buyback centre operations at four sites: OXFORD STREE
Sample 1
The Challenges. The Product/Solution should solve business challenges for one of the following three areas within the healthcare landscape in Bulgaria: • Challenge #1: Building the future smart pharmacy • Challenge #2: Save, healthy and integrated elderly society • Challenge #3: Life-long digital health management ● Phase 1: 2.05. - 7.06.2019 - Application submissions and invitation by the Organizer/ STR ● Phase 2: 8.06. - 14.06.2019 - Candidates review and selection process ● Phase 3: 17.07. - 18.08. 2019 - The Program Sessions and Design sprints
Sample 1
The Challenges. As the power balance has shifted, and customers have had to change the way they take part in creating their own package of support, a number of challenges have arisen. These challenges have included: • Opening up to person-centred thinking, which in many cases has reminded customers of their lives before they became ill. It has validated their talents and abilities, and has sparked interest in reviving old hobbies and skills. One customer, for example, astonished staff by talking about her teenage tennis championships, and followed this up with a commitment in her plan to taking it up again. Despite repeated pleas from her psychiatrist that the customer should exercise as a preventative measure against relapse, this was the first time that she had showed any motivation or interest in doing so • Taking control of their lives, where previously others have taken responsibility. This includes the challenge of thinking creatively about the support that they need and working out how to deal with greater choice. This can go way beyond customers’ comfort zones and needs skilled facilitation • Maintaining focus and motivation after the buzz of person-centred planning fades. This was helped by regular exercise of control (e.g. purchasing support frequently) and outcome based reviews which help customers to see what they have achieved and how much more they could do • Having the confidence to say which worker they would like to be supported by and overcoming concerns that workers they don’t choose might be offended or upset. This was mitigated by ensuring any customer could arrange their support directly with any member of staff • Having the confidence to ask workers to work shifts on specific days and times so that support can be delivered to suit them. When it is tried, however, it works well, such as when customers request particular members of staff to come in at a later time so that they can go out to the cinema or for a meal together • Recognising that the cash allocation is to meet eligible and assessed support needs, not to meet unrelated living expenses, such as general cash when running short, or for housing related bills • Managing cash, using cash allocations to meet agreed outcomes and returning receipts. There have, to date, been no examples of unaccounted spend, and perhaps unsurprisingly, many customers have been more diligent with the personalisation money and receipts than they normally are with their own money.
Sample 1

Related to The Challenges

  • Challenges The Experts may be challenged by either Party if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to any of their impartiality or independence. In such circumstances the challenge shall be brought by written notice to the ICC copied to the other Party within fourteen (14) calendar days of the appointment of the relevant Expert or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenging Party becoming aware of the circumstances giving rise to the challenge. Unless the challenged Expert withdraws. or whichever of the Parties that has not brought the challenge agrees to the challenge, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenge, the ICC shall decide the challenge and, if appropriate, shall appoint a replacement Expert in accordance with the criteria set out herein.

  • No Challenges In no event shall any Secured Party take any action to challenge, contest or dispute the validity, extent, enforceability, or priority of the Collateral Agent’s Liens hereunder or under any other Security Document with respect to any of the Collateral, or that would have the effect of invalidating any such Lien or support any Person who takes any such action. Each of the Secured Parties agrees that it will not take any action to challenge, contest or dispute the validity, enforceability or secured status of any other Secured Party’s claims against any Obligor (other than any such claim resulting from a breach of this Agreement by a Secured Party, or any challenge, contest or dispute alleging arithmetical error in the determination of a claim), or that would have the effect of invalidating any such claim, or support any Person who takes any such action.

  • Challenge If Executive violates or challenges the enforceability of any provisions of the Restrictive Covenants or this Release, no further payments, rights or benefits under Section 5 of the Agreement will be due to Executive (except where such provision would be prohibited by applicable law, rule or regulation).

  • Legal Action There shall not have been instituted or threatened any legal proceeding relating to, or seeking to prohibit or otherwise challenge the consummation of, the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or to obtain substantial damages with respect thereto.

  • No Challenge Each Stockholder agrees not to commence, join in, facilitate, assist or encourage, and agrees to take all actions necessary to opt out of any class in any class action with respect to, any claim, derivative or otherwise, against Parent, Merger Sub, the Company or any of their respective successors or directors (a) challenging the validity of, or seeking to enjoin the operation of, any provision of this Agreement or the Merger Agreement or (b) alleging a breach of any fiduciary duty of any person in connection with the evaluation, negotiation or entry into the Merger Agreement.

  • No Proceedings or Litigation No action, suit or proceeding before any arbitrator or any governmental authority shall have been commenced, and no investigation by any governmental authority shall have been threatened, against the Company or any Subsidiary, or any of the officers, directors or affiliates of the Company or any Subsidiary seeking to restrain, prevent or change the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or seeking damages in connection with such transactions.

  • Outcome Include the following: 1) evaluation of project’s ability to meet goals and expected performance measures and provide explanation for why goals were not met, if applicable; 2) identify successful outcomes, areas for improvement, and quantifiable metrics (including the assigned metric in Exhibit A, if applicable) as a result of the project; and 3) final project photos, if an implementation construction project.

  • Legal Proceedings Except as described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there are no legal, governmental or regulatory investigations, actions, suits or proceedings pending to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is or may be a party or to which any property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries is or may be the subject that, individually or in the aggregate, if determined adversely to the Company or any of its subsidiaries, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; no such investigations, actions, suits or proceedings are threatened or, to the knowledge of the Company, contemplated by any governmental or regulatory authority or threatened by others; and (i) there are no current or pending legal, governmental or regulatory actions, suits or proceedings that are required under the Securities Act to be described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Prospectus that are not so described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus and (ii) there are no statutes, regulations or contracts or other documents that are required under the Securities Act to be filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement or described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Prospectus that are not so filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement or described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus.

  • Patent Challenge 6.5.1 Licensor may terminate this Agreement, effective immediately upon written notice to Licensee, upon the commencement by Licensee or any of its Affiliates of a Patent Challenge. 6.5.2 Licensee shall include in each sublicense agreement entered into with a Sublicensee a right of Licensee to terminate such sublicense agreement if such Sublicensee commences a Patent Challenge; and Licensee shall terminate the sublicense agreement, effective immediately upon written notice to the Sublicensee, if the Sublicensee commences a Patent Challenge. In addition, if the Sublicensee’s commencement of a Patent Challenge gives Licensor’s licensor a right of termination under the Penn Agreement and such licensor threatens to terminate the Penn Agreement, then, upon receipt of notice to such effect, Licensor may terminate this Agreement, effective immediately upon written notice to Licensee, if the Sublicensee commences a Patent Challenge. 6.5.3 For purposes of this Section 6.5, “Patent Challenge” means any action against Licensor or the University of Pennsylvania or SmithKline Xxxxxxx Corporation (or their successors under the Existing Licenses), including an action for declaratory judgment, to declare or render invalid or unenforceable the Licensed Patents, or any claim thereof.

  • No Lawsuits No suit, action or other proceeding or investigation shall be threatened or pending before or by any Court or Government concerning this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. No Government shall have threatened or directed any request for information concerning this Agreement, the transactions contemplated hereby or the consequences or implications of such transactions to Buyer, to Seller, or to any officer, director, employee or agent of it.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!