Optional Technical Skills Evaluation Sample Clauses

Optional Technical Skills Evaluation. (1) The Technical Skills Evaluation will be developed by a consultant chosen by the Chief of Police from a list generated by the Director of Civil Service. The Evaluation will consist of one or more written scenario(s) to which the candidate shall submit a written response. The written Technical Skills evaluation should be closely related to the job functions of the rank being tested for and ascertainment of evaluative skillsets. If a specific format or formulaic response is favored, this should be clearly established in the instructions so as to not penalize a candidate for simply failing to follow a favored format. Candidates should be provided sufficient time to complete such evaluation. (2) The Evaluation will be administered by the Civil Service Commission immediately following the Written Examination and before the grading of the Written Examination. The candidate’s written responses to the Evaluation will be sealed and held for scoring by assessors selected by the consultant based on the same criteria used for selecting Assessment Center assessors in Section 6 below. The candidate’s written responses to the Evaluation will not be graded unless the candidate scored at least seventy percent (70%) on the Written Examination. (3) Scoring of the written responses will be based on a key provided to the assessors by the consultant. The scoring key will award points based on whether the response includes applicable topics or concepts and shall not allow partial credit for topics or concepts, to ensure that the scoring is objective in nature and does not reflect the assessor’s subjective judgment.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Optional Technical Skills Evaluation. (1) The Technical Skills Evaluation will be developed by a consultant chosen by the Chief of Police from a list generated by the Human Resources Department. The Evaluation will consist of a written scenario to which the candidate shall submit a written response. (2) The Evaluation will be administered by the Civil Service Commission immediately following the Written Examination and before the grading of the Written Examination. The candidate’s written responses to the Evaluation will be sealed and held for scoring by assessors selected by the consultant based on the same criteria used for selecting Assessment Center assessors in Section 6 below. The candidate’s written responses to the Evaluation will not be graded unless the candidate scored at least seventy percent (70%) on the Written Examination. (3) Scoring of the written responses will be based on a key provided to the assessors by the consultant. The scoring key will award points based on whether the response includes applicable topics or concepts and shall not allow partial credit for topics or concepts, to ensure that the scoring is objective in nature and does not reflect the assessor’s subjective judgment.

Related to Optional Technical Skills Evaluation

  • Recommended language skills The sending institution, following agreement with the receiving institution, is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study or teaching period:

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • Specialized Skills Each certificated support person demonstrates in his/her performance a competent level of skill and knowledge in designing and conducting specialized programs of prevention, instruction, remediation and evaluation.

  • Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets: a. are targets only, b. are provided solely for the purposes of planning, c. are subject to confirmation, and d. may be changed at the discretion of the Funder in consultation with the HSP. The HSP will proactively manage the risks associated with multi-year planning and the potential changes to the planning targets; and the Funder agrees that it will communicate any changes to the planning targets as soon as reasonably possible.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Curriculum Development This includes the analysis and coordination of textual materials; constant review of current literature in the field, some of which are selected for the college library collection, the preparation of selective, descriptive materials such as outlines and syllabi; conferring with other faculty and administration on curricular problems; and, the attendance and participation in inter and intra-college conferences and advisory committees.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • How to get a TIN If you do not have a TIN, apply for one immediately. To apply for an SSN, get Form SS-5, Application for a Social Security Card, from your local SSA office or get this form online at xxx.XXX.xxx. You may also get this form by calling 0-000-000-0000. Use Form W-7, Application for IRS Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, to apply for an ITIN, or Form SS-4, Application for Employer Identification Number, to apply for an EIN. You can apply for an EIN online by accessing the IRS website at xxx.xxx.xxx/Xxxxxxxxxx and clicking on Employer Identification Number (EIN) under Starting a Business. Go to xxx.xxx.xxx/Xxxxx to view, download, or print Form W-7 and/or Form SS-4. Or, you can go to xxx.xxx.xxx/XxxxxXxxxx to place an order and have Form W-7 and/or SS-4 mailed to you within 10 business days. If you are asked to complete Form W-9 but do not have a TIN, apply for a TIN and write “Applied For” in the space for the TIN, sign and date the form, and give it to the requester. For interest and dividend payments, and certain payments made with respect to readily tradable instruments, generally you will have 60 days to get a TIN and give it to the requester before you are subject to backup withholding on payments. The 60-day rule does not apply to other types of payments. You will be subject to backup withholding on all such payments until you provide your TIN to the requester.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!