Professional Evaluation Appeal Process Sample Clauses

Professional Evaluation Appeal Process. 25 For the purpose of this appeal process, information provided by email will be considered 26 to have been submitted in writing. 28 An Adjunct faculty member who receives an evaluation that results in the Department 29 not offering that faculty member a two-year appointment may appeal to the Chair within 30 30 days. Appeals will be made using the form in the Appendix. Faculty members will be 31 informed of their right to PSUFA representation. The Chair shall provide a written 32 response within 10 days of receiving an appeal. 34 If the faculty member is dissatisfied with the Chair’s decision, the faculty member may 35 appeal to the Xxxx (using Appendix D), with a copy to the Chair, within 10 days after 36 receiving the Chair’s appeal response. Within 5 days after receipt of the appeal to the 37 Xxxx, the Chair shall provide the Xxxx with all documents pertinent to the evaluation, 38 with a copy to the faculty member. The faculty member may file a written explanation in 39 support of their position. The Xxxx will render their decision in writing within 5 business 40 days of receiving the appeal and required documentation. The Xxxx’x decision is final. 42 Grievances, with regard to professional evaluations may only be filed on process issues.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Professional Evaluation Appeal Process

  • Classification Appeal Procedure An employee shall have the right to appeal, through the Union, the classification of the position the employee occupies, or where a point rating plan has been used, the right to appeal the position's level. Classification matters are not grievable under Article 8 of this Agreement. Instead, the following procedures shall be followed.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Appeal Process PROVIDER may appeal any adverse finding by the Contract Compliance Officer as set forth in sec. 25.08(20)(c), D.C. Ords.

  • PROFESSIONAL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE A. A claim by a teacher, the Association, or the Board of Education that there has been a violation, misinterpretation or misapplication of specific provisions of this Agreement may be processed as a grievance as hereinafter provided.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A. The Board agrees to implement the following:

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.