Quality Control/Punch List Process Sample Clauses

Quality Control/Punch List Process. Architect shall evaluate during the Construction Administration and Closeout Phases the contractor(s)’ execution and overall delivery of its work throughout the construction process shall use its best efforts to ensure the Project meets or exceeds the criteria as set forth in the Conforming Set. The Parties acknowledge that this process is not commissioning of the Project or the Project’s system(s). 7.7.1. The Quality Control/Punch List (“QC”/”Punch”) Process is a comprehensive and systematic process to verify that the building systems and assemblies are constructed and installed as designed to meet the District’s requirements. Quality Control during the Construction Phase, the Closeout Phase, and all warranty periods shall achieve the following specific objectives: 7.7.1.1. Verify and document that assemblies and equipment are installed per manufacturer’s recommendations, product minimum standards, and the design intent expressed in the Contract Documents. 7.7.1.2. Verify and document that the manufacturer(s) and designer(s) of assemblies, equipment, and systems have approved the full compliance, performance, and operation of all completed assemblies, equipment, and systems for that they manufactured and/or designed. 7.7.1.3. Verify and document assembly, equipment, and system function. 7.7.1.4. Verify the completeness of operations and maintenance materials. 7.7.1.5. Assist the District so that the District’s operating personnel receive all required training and are offered additional and supplemental training, on the operation and maintenance of building assemblies, equipment, and systems, all to be provided by the party responsible for providing that training. 7.7.1.6. In addition to all incomplete items on its punch list, document items of known non-compliance in materials, installation or operation. 7.7.2. The QC/Punch Process does not reduce the responsibility of any designers or contractors to provide a finished and fully functioning product.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality Control/Punch List Process. Architect shall evaluate during the Construction Administration and Closeout Phases the contractor(s)’ execution and overall delivery of its work throughout the construction process shall use its best efforts to ensure the Project meets or exceeds the criteria as set forth in the Conforming Set. The Parties acknowledge that this process is not commissioning of the Project or the Project’s system(s).
Quality Control/Punch List Process. During the Construction Administration and Closeout Phases, Architect shall evaluate Project contractors’ execution and overall delivery of work and 7.8.1. The Quality Control/Punch List (“QC/Punch”) Process is a comprehensive and systematic process to verify that the building systems and assemblies are constructed and installed as designed to meet District’s requirements. Quality Control during the Construction Phase, the Closeout Phase, and all warranty periods shall achieve the following specific objectives: 7.8.1.1. Verification and documentation that assemblies and equipment are installed per manufacturer’s recommendations, product minimum standards, and the design intent expressed in the Contract Documents. 7.8.1.2. Verification and documentation that the manufacturer(s) and designer(s) of assemblies, equipment, and systems have approved the full compliance, performance, and operation of all completed assemblies, equipment, and systems for that they manufactured and/or designed. 7.8.1.3. Verification and documentation that assembly, equipment, and system function. 7.8.1.4. Verification of the completeness of operations and maintenance materials. 7.8.1.5. Ensure that District’s operating personnel receive all required training and are offered additional and supplemental training, on the operation and maintenance of building assemblies, equipment, and systems. 7.8.1.6. Verification and documentation of all incomplete items on punch list, and items of known non‐compliance in materials, installation or operation. 7.8.2. The QC/Punch Process does not reduce the responsibility of any designers or contractors to provide a finished and fully functioning product.

Related to Quality Control/Punch List Process

  • Quality Control Program Engineer shall have a quality control program in place that ensures that all deliverable work is of high quality. Engineer shall submit a plan detailing its program to the Inspection Branch of the TxDOT Bridge Division for review and approval prior to beginning work. State may review or audit the programs.

  • Quality Control A. Controlled Affiliate agrees to use the Licensed Marks and Name only in connection with the licensed services and further agrees to be bound by the conditions regarding quality control shown in attached Exhibit A as they may be amended by BCBSA from time-to-time. B. Controlled Affiliate agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws. C. Controlled Affiliate agrees that it will provide on an annual basis (or more often if reasonably required by Plan or by BCBSA) a report or reports to Plan and BCBSA demonstrating Controlled Affiliate’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement including but not limited to the quality control provisions of this paragraph and the attached Exhibit A. D. Controlled Affiliate agrees that Plan and/or BCBSA may, from time-to-time, upon reasonable notice, review and inspect the manner and method of Controlled Affiliate’s rendering of service and use of the Licensed Marks and Name. E. As used herein, a Controlled Affiliate is defined as an entity organized and operated in such a manner, that it meets the following requirements: (1) A Plan or Plans authorized to use the Licensed Marks in the Service Area of the Controlled Affiliate pursuant to separate License Agreement(s) with BCBSA, other than such Controlled Affiliate’s License Agreement(s), (the “Controlling Plan(s)”), must have the legal authority directly or indirectly through wholly-owned subsidiaries to select members of the Controlled Affiliate’s governing body having not less than 50% voting control thereof and to: (a) prevent any change in the articles of incorporation, bylaws or other establishing or governing documents of the Controlled Affiliate with which the Controlling Plan(s) do(es) not concur; (b) exercise control over the policy and operations of the Controlled Affiliate at least equal to that exercised by persons or entities (jointly or individually) other than the Controlling Plan(s); and Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in (a) through (b) hereof, the Controlled Affiliate’s establishing or governing documents must also require written approval by the Controlling Plan(s) before the Controlled Affiliate can: (i) change its legal and/or trade names; (ii) change the geographic area in which it operates; (iii) change any of the type(s) of businesses in which it engages; (iv) create, or become liable for by way of guarantee, any indebtedness, other than indebtedness arising in the ordinary course of business; (v) sell any assets, except for sales in the ordinary course of business or sales of equipment no longer useful or being replaced; (vi) make any loans or advances except in the ordinary course of business; (vii) enter into any arrangement or agreement with any party directly or indirectly affiliated with any of the owners or persons or entities with the authority to select or appoint members or board members of the Controlled Affiliate, other than the Plan or Plans (excluding owners of stock holdings of under 5% in a publicly traded Controlled Affiliate); (viii) conduct any business other than under the Licensed Marks and Name; (ix) take any action that any Controlling Plan or BCBSA reasonably believes will adversely affect the Licensed Marks and Name. In addition, a Plan or Plans directly or indirectly through wholly owned subsidiaries shall own at least 50% of any for-profit Controlled Affiliate. (2) A Plan or Plans authorized to use the Licensed Marks in the Service Area of the Controlled Affiliate pursuant to separate License Agreement(s) with BCBSA, other than such Controlled Affiliate’s License Agreement(s), (the “Controlling Plan(s)”), have the legal authority directly or indirectly through wholly-owned subsidiaries to select members of the Controlled Affiliate’s governing body having more than 50% voting control thereof and to: (a) prevent any change in the articles of incorporation, bylaws or other establishing or governing documents of the Controlled Affiliate with which the Controlling Plan(s) do(es) not concur; (b) exercise control over the policy and operations of the Controlled Affiliate. In addition, a Plan or Plans directly or indirectly through wholly-owned subsidiaries shall own more than 50% of any for-profit Controlled Affiliate.

  • Quality control system (i) The Contractor shall establish a quality control mechanism to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Agreement (the “Quality Assurance Plan” or “QAP”). (ii) The Contractor shall, within 30 (thirty) days of the Appointed Date, submit to the Authority’s Engineer its Quality Assurance Plan which shall include the following: (a) organisation, duties and responsibilities, procedures, inspections and documentation; (b) quality control mechanism including sampling and testing of Materials, test frequencies, standards, acceptance criteria, testing facilities, reporting, recording and interpretation of test results, approvals, check list for site activities, and proforma for testing and calibration in accordance with the Specifications for Road and Bridge Works issued by MORTH, relevant IRC specifications and Good Industry Practice; and (c) internal quality audit system. The Authority’s Engineer shall convey its approval to the Contractor within a period of 21 (twenty-one) days of receipt of the QAP stating the modifications, if any, required, and the Contractor shall incorporate those in the QAP to the extent required for conforming with the provisions of this Clause 11.2. (iii) The Contractor shall procure all documents, apparatus and instruments, fuel, consumables, water, electricity, labour, Materials, samples, and qualified personnel as are necessary for examining and testing the Project Assets and workmanship in accordance with the Quality Assurance Plan. (iv) The cost of testing of Construction, Materials and workmanship under this Article 11 shall be borne by the Contractor.

  • Quality Control Procedures The Seller shall have an internal quality control program that verifies, on a regular basis, the existence and accuracy of the legal documents, credit documents, property appraisals, and underwriting decisions. The program shall include evaluating and monitoring the overall quality of the Seller's loan production and the servicing activities of the Seller. The program is to ensure that the Mortgage Loans are originated and serviced in accordance with Accepted Servicing Standards and the Underwriting Guidelines; guard against dishonest, fraudulent, or negligent acts; and guard against errors and omissions by officers, employees, or other authorized persons.

  • Service Specification The Parties have agreed upon the scope and specification of the Services provided under this Service Agreement in the Service Specification.

  • Escrow Format Specification Deposit’s Format. Registry objects, such as domains, contacts, name servers, registrars, etc. will be compiled into a file constructed as described in draft-xxxxx-xxxxxxx-registry-data-escrow, see Part A, Section 9, reference 1 of this Specification and draft-xxxxx-xxxxxxx-dnrd-objects-mapping, see Part A, Section 9, reference 2 of this Specification (collectively, the “DNDE Specification”). The DNDE Specification describes some elements as optional; Registry Operator will include those elements in the Deposits if they are available. If not already an RFC, Registry Operator will use the most recent draft version of the DNDE Specification available at the Effective Date. Registry Operator may at its election use newer versions of the DNDE Specification after the Effective Date. Once the DNDE Specification is published as an RFC, Registry Operator will implement that version of the DNDE Specification, no later than one hundred eighty (180) calendar days after. UTF-8 character encoding will be used.

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • ODUF Packing Specifications 6.3.1 A pack will contain a minimum of one message record or a maximum of 99,999 message records plus a pack header record and a pack trailer record. One transmission can contain a maximum of 99 packs and a minimum of one pack.

  • MSAA Indicator Technical Specification Document This Agreement shall be interpreted with reference to the MSAA Indicator Technical Specifications document.

  • Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications furnished on the CD are intended to establish the standards for quality, performance and technical requirements for all labor, workmanship, material, methods and equipment necessary to complete the Work. When specifications and drawings are provided or referenced by the County, these are to be considered part of the Scope of Work, and to be specifically documented in the Detailed Scope of Work. For convenience, the County supplied specifications, if any, and the Technical Specifications furnished on the CD.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!