Quality objectives for suppliers Sample Clauses

Quality objectives for suppliers. The organization determines quality objectives for the error and complaint rates for each supplier depending on the purchased product group. Part of the quality assurance agreement is a defined target and escalation line. Thus, there are three modes and two escalation levels (Section 3.11.4 for suppliers: • Mode 1: Error rate and complaint rate below the finish lineMode 2: Error rate or complaint rate above the finish line for more than three months • Mode 3: Error rate or complaint rate above the escalation line for more than three months Category Mode CSL PPM and/or Complaint rate Casting (grey cast iron, ductile iron) 1 - ˂20,000 And ˂5% 2 1 ˃20,000 Or <10% 3 2 ˃50,000 Or >20% Casting (cast steel) 1 - ˂50,000 And ˂5% 2 1 ˃50,000 Or <10% 3 2 ˃100,000 Or >20% Spindles (finishing) 1 - ˂1,000 And ˂3% 2 1 ˃1,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃5,000 Or >10% Standard and catalogue parts 1 - ˂1,000 And ˂3% 2 1 ˃1,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃5,000 Or >10% Ball bearing 1 - ˂1,000 And ˂3% 2 1 ˃1,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃5,000 Or >10% Seals 1 - 5.000˂ And ˂3% 2 1 ˃5,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃10,000 Or >10% Engines 1 - 5.000˂ And ˂3% 2 1 ˃5,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃10,000 Or >10% Valves 1 - 5.000˂ And ˂3% 2 1 ˃5,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃10,000 Or >10% 1 - 5.000˂ And ˂3% Directive RL 621 Quality Assurance Agreement (QAA)Status: 04 from 20.10.2022 Plug-in shafts 2 1 ˃5,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃10,000 Or >10% Filter 1 - 5.000˂ And ˂3% 2 1 ˃5,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃10,000 Or >10% Welded parts 1 - 5.000˂ And ˂3% 2 1 ˃5,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃10,000 Or >10% Drawing parts 1 - 5.000˂ And ˂3% 2 1 ˃5,000 Or <5% 3 2 ˃10,000 Or >10% The following key data are defined for the supplier: Mode CSL PPM and/or Complaints Supplier: 1 - ˂ And ˂
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Quality objectives for suppliers

  • Critical Milestones (a) Subject to the provisions of Section 3.1(c), commencing on the Effective Date, Seller shall develop the Facility in order to achieve the following milestones (“Critical Milestones”) on or before the date set forth in this Section 3.1(a):

  • Quality of Services (a) The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Service Objectives D4.1 The Services will:

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Targets and Milestones You may choose to develop specific additional targets and milestones which assess your performance in ITT over time – particularly if ITT trainees make up a significant proportion of your overall student body. Alternatively, you may have targets and milestones in your existing 2012-13 access agreement which you now also wish to apply to undergraduate and/or postgraduate ITT trainees. These targets may be statistical – based on how representative your entrants are and/or your retention performance – and might include annual or interim milestones to help you monitor whether you are making progress. You may wish to include criteria around the numbers of trainees in receipt of a full or partial maintenance grant, as financial data will need to be collected to determine bursary support and the data will also be accessible through the Student Loans Company for HEBSS subscribers. You may also wish to consider the TDA guidance at Annex C which gives information on specific groups that are Annex A underrepresented in the teaching profession. In this section, please state whether you intend to develop additional targets and milestones, or the extent to which you intend to use targets and milestones in your existing agreement which you now wish to extend to apply to undergraduate and/or postgraduate ITT trainees. Where you have new or amended milestones and targets, you should set these out in your Excel template (Annex B) at Table 6. The University of Cambridge does not intend to adjust its current targets or to develop additional targets and milestones for its ITT provision. The number of students on the PGCE programme amount to less than 4% of the total population of Cambridge students with which the Office for Fair Access is concerned, and all of those students have already experienced a first taste of higher education. It would therefore be disproportionate to set specific aims and objectives for this group.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Quality of Work Consultant agrees that all Services performed under this Agreement will conform to the specifications of the College, be free from errors, and be of professional quality according to applicable industry standards. Upon notice by the College, Consultant will promptly correct any defects without charge to the College unless the request is considered new work by both parties.

  • Scope and Objectives 1. This Partnership Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) defines the rights and obligations of the Parties and sets forth the terms and conditions of their cooperation in the implementation of the Project.

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.