Questioned Medical Certifications Sample Clauses

Questioned Medical Certifications. Should the University question the validity of the employee's certification for her/his own serious health condition, the University may, at its sole non-grievable discretion, require that the employee obtain a second medical opinion from a second health care provider selected by the University. Should the second medical opinion differ from the opinion of the employee's own health care provider, the University may, at its sole non-grievable discretion, require a third medical opinion from a third health care provider, jointly selected by the employee and the University. The University shall bear the cost of the second and third opinions, and the third opinion shall be final.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Questioned Medical Certifications. Should the University have a good faith, objective reason to doubt the validity of the Academic Researcher’s certification for the Academic Researcher’s own serious health condition, the University may, at its sole discretion, require that the Academic Researcher obtain a second medical opinion from a second health care provider selected by the University. Should the second medical opinion differ from the opinion of the Academic Researcher’s own health care provider, the University may, at its sole discretion, require a third medical opinion from a third health care provider, jointly selected by the Academic Researcher and the University. The University shall bear the cost of the second and third opinions and the third opinion shall be final.
Questioned Medical Certifications. Should the University have a good faith, objective reason to doubt the validity of the employee's certification for her/his own serious health condition the University may, at its sole discretion, require the employee to obtain a second medical opinion from a second health care provider selected by the University. Should the second medical opinion differ from the opinion of the employee's own health care provider, the University may, at its sole discretion, require a third medical opinion from a third health care provider, jointly agreed to by the employee and the University. The University shall bear the cost of the second and third opinions, and the third opinion shall be final. If a second or third opinion is sought, the University shall provide the employee with a copy of the opinion at no cost to the employee, upon request.
Questioned Medical Certifications. Should AHS question the validity of the employee's certification for her/his own serious health condition, AHS may, at its sole discretion, require that the employee obtain a second medical opinion from a second health care provider selected by AHS. Should the second medical opinion differ from the opinion of the employee's own health care provider, AHS may, at its sole discretion, require a third medical opinion from a third health care provider, jointly selected by the employee and AHS. AHS shall bear the cost of the second and third opinions, and the third opinion shall be final.
Questioned Medical Certifications. Should the University have a good faith, objective reason to doubt the validity of the Librarian’s certification for the Librarian’s own serious health condition, the University may, at its sole non-grievable discretion, require that the Librarian obtain a second medical opinion from a second health care provider selected by the University. Should the second medical opinion differ from the opinion of the Librarian’s own health care provider, the University may, at its sole non-grievable discretion, require a third medical opinion from a third health care provider, jointly selected by the Librarian and the University. The University shall bear the cost of the second and third opinions and the third opinion shall be final.

Related to Questioned Medical Certifications

  • Medical Certification (1) The University may require an employee to provide medical certification from a health care provider for FMLA leave without pay when taken for the serious health condition of the employee or the employee's family member.

  • Federal Certifications Grantee further certifies that, to the extent federal certifications are incorporated into the Grant Agreement, the Grantee has reviewed the federal certifications and that Grantee is in compliance with all requirements. In addition, Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with all applicable federal laws, rules, and regulations, as they may pertain to this Grant Agreement.

  • CHILD SUPPORT CERTIFICATION Under Section 231.006, Texas Family Code, the Engineer certifies that the individual or business entity named in this contract, bid, or application is not ineligible to receive the specified grant, loan, or payment and acknowledges that this contract may be terminated and payment may be withheld if this certification is inaccurate. If the above certification is shown to be false, the Engineer is liable to the state for attorney’s fees, the cost necessary to complete the contract, including the cost of advertising and awarding a second contract, and any other damages provided by law or the contract. A child support obligor or business entity ineligible to receive payments because of a payment delinquency of more than thirty (30) days remains ineligible until: all arrearages have been paid; the obligor is in compliance with a written repayment agreement or court order as to any existing delinquency; or the court of continuing jurisdiction over the child support order has granted the obligor an exemption from Subsection (a) of Section 231.006, Texas Family Code, as part of a court- supervised effort to improve earnings and child support payments.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.