Reasonable Enhancement Award to the Named Plaintiffs Sample Clauses

Reasonable Enhancement Award to the Named Plaintiffs. Class Counsel have stated they will seek approval from the Court for a reasonable enhancement award to the Named Plaintiffs, in a total aggregate amount not to exceed Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000), with each of the four Named Plaintiffs receiving $7,500 of that amount. If the Court awards a lesser amount to the Named Plaintiffs, the difference between the amount allocated under this Settlement Agreement and the amount awarded shall be included in the Maximum Distributable Amount (as defined in Section IX.A.5). This payment is in addition to each Named Plaintiffs’ Settlement Share to which she may be entitled (if any) as a member of the Final Settlement Class. The Named Plaintiffs will receive an IRS Form 1099 for the portion of the settlement distributed to him or her that represents his or her respective enhancement payment. The Named Plaintiffs shall be responsible for properly declaring such income to the appropriate taxing authorities and for paying any taxes due on such amounts. In exchange for this enhancement award, the Named Plaintiffs will enter into a binding general release of all known and unknown claims they may have against Defendants.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reasonable Enhancement Award to the Named Plaintiffs. Class Counsel has stated they will seek approval from the Court for a reasonable enhancement award to the Named Plaintiffs in the amount specified in Section IX(A)(3). The payment is in addition to the Named Plaintiffs’ Settlement Share to which they may be entitled as a member of the Final Settlement Class. The Named Plaintiffs will receive an IRS Form 1099 for the portion of the settlement distributed to them that represents their enhancement payment. The Named Plaintiffs shall be responsible for properly declaring such income to the appropriate taxing authorities, and for paying any taxes due on such amounts. In exchange for their enhancement award, the Named Plaintiffs will enter into a binding release of all claims.
Reasonable Enhancement Award to the Named Plaintiffs. Class Counsel have stated they will seek approval from the Court for a reasonable enhancement award to the Named Plaintiffs, and to the Estate of Xxxxxxx Xxxx, who was formerly a named plaintiff but died during the pendency of the Action, in a total aggregate amount not to exceed a total of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) to be paid out of the Maximum Settlement Amount, and Defendants have agreed not to oppose this request. The Enhancement Award shall be allocated $17,500 each to Xxxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxx, and $15,000 to the Estate of Xxxxxxx Xxxx. If the Court awards a lesser amount to the Named Plaintiffs, the difference between the amount allocated under this Settlement Agreement and the amount awarded shall be included in the Maximum Distributable Amount (as defined in paragraph IX.A.5). This payment is in addition to each Named Plaintiffs’ Settlement Share to which she may be entitled as a member of the Final Settlement Class. The Named Plaintiffs and the Estate of Xxxxxxx Xxxx will receive an IRS Form 1099 for the portion of the settlement distributed to her or it that represents her or its respective enhancement payment. The Named Plaintiffs shall be responsible for properly declaring such income to the appropriate taxing authorities, and for paying any taxes due on such amounts. Any employer’s withholding, payroll or other taxes that might be owed on this payment shall be paid by Defendants. In exchange for this enhancement award, the Named Plaintiffs (including Xx. Xxxx’x estate) will enter into a binding general release of all known and unknown claims they may have against Defendants, subject to a waiver of the protections of Civil Code section 1542.

Related to Reasonable Enhancement Award to the Named Plaintiffs

  • Oregon Public Service Retirement Plan Pension Program Members For purposes of this Section 2, “employee” means an employee who is employed by the State on or after August 29, 2003 and who is not eligible to receive benefits under ORS Chapter 238 for service with the State pursuant to Section 2 of Chapter 733, Oregon Laws 2003.

  • Performance Frameworks ‌ The School's academic, organizational, and financial performance under this Charter Contract shall be evaluated using the Academic, Organizational, and Financial Performance Frameworks, respectively, attached as Exhibit B to this Charter Contract. The specific terms, forms, and requirements of the Performance Frameworks, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are maintained and disseminated by the Commission and shall be binding on the School. Material changes to the Performance Frameworks shall require approval by the Commission.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • How do the RMD Rules Impact my Designated Beneficiary or Beneficiaries The RMD rules provide for the determination of your designated beneficiary or beneficiaries as of September 30 of the year following your death. Consequently, any beneficiary may be eliminated for purposes of calculating the RMD by the distribution of that beneficiary’s benefit, through a valid disclaimer between your death and the end of September following the year of your death, or by dividing your IRA account into separate accounts for each of several designated beneficiaries you may have designated.

  • Developer Compensation for Emergency Services If, during an Emergency State, the Developer provides services at the request or direction of the NYISO or Connecting Transmission Owner, the Developer will be compensated for such services in accordance with the NYISO Services Tariff.

  • Joint Benefits Committee In order to achieve benefit cost reductions, or at a minimum, cost containment, the parties agree to establish and aggressively participate in a Joint Benefits Committee. The parties agree that the Joint Benefits Committee shall explore all potential options or changes that could generate cost reductions to the Benefit Plans with the following order of priorities:

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority

  • System for Award Management (XXX) XXX.gov)

  • Referral to the Committee a) Prior to referral to the Committee, the matter shall be brought to the attention of the other local party.

  • Relationship to Parent Award This Agreement incorporates all the terms and conditions of the Award (AW825280CAV) as at 10 April 2006 with the exception of clauses 13, 16.2.1, 22.3.4, 22.3.5, 37.6 and 40.3. Where there is inconsistency between the Award and this Agreement, the latter will prevail but only to the extent of the inconsistency.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!