RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Sample Clauses

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxxx Sheriff-Coroner EXHIBIT “A” (Effective July 1, 20232) The fees set forth in this exhibit represent the total cost of service provided by the COUNTY, through its SHERIFF-CORONER (SHERIFF), to CITY for fiscal year 20232- 243. ANNUAL OPERATING COST JULY 1, 20232 THROUGH JUNE 30, 20243 $539444,302617.1045 HOURLY RATE FOR HOURS IN EXCESS OF THREE HUNDRED AND SIXTY-FIVE (365) FLIGHT HOURS FROM JULY 1, 20232 THROUGH JUNE 30, 20243 $1,477218.5413 The annual operating cost shall be divided into twelve equal monthly payments of $4437,941051.8445 ($539444,302617.1045 divided by 12 months). PERIOD COVERED - July 1, 20232 to June 30, 20243 (twelve-month term). Total Contract Amount For Services $ 444,617.45539,302.10 Contracted Hourly Rate for Hours In Excess of Three Hundred and Sixty-Five (365) Hours Annually $ 1,477218.5413 Annual Flight Hours 365 Flight Time Per Day (in minutes) 00:60 Management of flight time provided to the CITY shall be the responsibility of the SHERIFF’s Air Support Bureau Commander. Flight time over the CITY will be recorded and monitored daily for the purpose of providing service in accordance with the above table. The CITY will be provided with a detailed monthly flying hour report. Flight hours that are deemed countywide service will not be counted towards the Three Hundred and Sixty-Five (365) contracted flight hours. The following type calls are deemed countywide service: Vehicle pursuits, bank robberies involving tracking systems, stolen vehicles equipped with tracking systems, riots, felonious suspects within a perimeter, assaults involving a weapon or an officer in need of assistance. Due to the inherent unknown nature in the need for airborne law enforcement service, SHERIFF will adjust daily service levels to coincide with the above table. In recognition that it will not always be possible to meet this goal (by either exceeding or falling short), SHERIFF will compensate for variations to arrive at an appropriatedaily average,” on a monthly basis. Exhibit A (Effective 7/1/232)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. STATE OF ALABAMA acting by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _______________________________ Xxxx X. XxXxxxx, P.E. State Office Engineer _______________________________ Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Transportation Director _______________________________
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. The proposed agreement meets the requirements of Xxxxxxx 00-00-0 XXXX and Subsection (B) of 6.31.2.9, NMAC By: ___________________________ Date: _____________ Director Special Education Bureau APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: ___________________________ Date: _____________ General Counsel New Mexico Public Education Department APPROVED: By: _____________________________ Date: _____________ Secretary of Education New Mexico Public Education Department
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. By Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx City Manager Mayor, Xxxx Xxxxxx (SEAL) Date CITY OF SOUTH ST XXXX RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By Xxx Xxxxx, City Engineer Mayor, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx APPROVED AS TO FORM: (SEAL) By City Attorney, Xxxx Land City Clerk Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Date DAKOTA COUNTY RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Engineer Assistant County Attorney / Date COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION: By: Physical Development Director
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. BY: COUNTY ENGINEER (Telephone) BY: REGION ENGINEER COUNTY OF BY: CHAIRMAN, COUNTY COMMISSION APPROVED: BY: STATE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER DATE: DETAILED ESTIMATE ITEM EST. COST TOTAL EST. NO. UNIT PER UNIT QUANTITY DESCRIPTION COST/ITEM
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. By: SCOXX XXXXXXXXXX Xhief, Real Property Division APPROVED AS TO FORM: SAMXXX XXXXXX, XX. Xhief Assistant County Counsel COUNTY By: JOHX X. XXXXXXX Xirector of Public Works (SELLERS) EXHIBIT ‘A' Legal description of additional right of way for the Trout Gulch Road Improvement Project. Parcel One Situated in the County of Santa Crux, Xtate of California. Being a part of the parcel of land conveyed by deed to Bay-view Partners, filed for record September 26, 1990 in Volume 4737, Page 47, Santa Cruz County Records and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point at the northeast corner of Parcel B as shown in Book 46 of Parcel Maps, Page 57, Records of Santa Cruz County, said point being the intersection of the northeast property line of said and the westerly right of way line of Trout Gulch Road; thence leaving the northeast property line of said Parcel B and the westerly right of way line of Trout Gulch Road North East, 17.53 feet to a point, said point being on the property line of. lands owned by Patxxxxx Xxxxxxxx xxd Gaix Xxxxxxxx xx recorded in Volume 4914, Page 586, Santa Cruz County Records; thence South 4.27 feet along the property line of said lands of Thoxxxxx xx a point,' said point being the intersection of the property line of said lands of Thoxxxxx xxd . the westerly right of way line of Trout Gulch Road; thence leaving the property line of said lands of Thoxxxxx Xxuth West, 17.00 feet along the westerly right of way line of Trout Gulch Road to the point of beginning. Containing 36 square feet more or less. APN 041-000-00 Xile Name: MAF EXHIBIT ‘A' Legal description of sidewalk easement for the Trout Gulch Road Improvement Project. Parcel Two Situated in the County of Santa Crux, Xtate of California. Being a part of the parcel of 1 and conveyed by deed to Partners, filed for record September 26, 1990 in Volume 4737, Page 47, Santa Cruz County Records and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point at the northeast corner of Parcel B as shown in Book 46 of Parcel Maps, Page 57, Records of Santa Cruz County, said point being the intersection of the northeast property line of said Parcel B and the westerly right of way line of Trout Gulch Road; thence North West, 7.87 feet along the northeast property line of said Parcel B and leaving the westerly right of way line of Trout Gulch Road to a point; thence leaving the northeast property line of said Parcel B North East, 17.78 feet to a point, said point being on the ...
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. 5 Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians 6 7 By 8 Title: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 CITY Approvals APPROVED BY: By DR. XXXXXXX XXXXXX City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By XXXXXX XXXXXX City Attorney ATTEST: By XXXXX XXXXXXXX City Clerk Twenty Nine Palms of Mission Indians & City of Coachella Service Agreement 2 Exhibit 1 Project Plans 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Twenty Nine Palms of Mission Indians & City of Coachella Service Agreement 3 Xxxxxx Road Paving Project 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Twenty Nine Palms of Mission Indians & City of Coachella Service Agreement 4 Xxxxxx Road Paving Project 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Twenty Nine Palms of Mission Indians & City of Coachella Service Agreement 5 Xxxxxx Road Paving Project 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Twenty Nine Palms of Mission Indians & City of Coachella Service Agreement 6 Xxxxxx Road Paving Project 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Twenty Nine Palms of Mission Indians & City of Coachella Service Agreement 7 Xxxxxx Road Paving Project 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Twenty Nine Palms of Mission Indians & City of Coachella Service Agreement 8 Xxxxxx Road Paving Project Exhibit 2 Project Estimate 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Twenty Nine Palms of Mission Indians & City of Coachella Service Agreement 9 Xxxxxx Road Paving Project 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. Approved as to legal form: San Xxxxxxx Valley Unified Air Pollution San Xxxxxxx Valley Unified Air Control District Pollution Control District Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxx X. Xxx Executive Director/APCO District Counsel Approved as to accounting form: For accounting use only: San Xxxxxxx Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Program: Account No.: Xxxxx X. XxXxx
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. BY: Region Engineer BY: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx Right of Way Bureau Chief THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN LEGALLY REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT. BY: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Chief Counsel, Alabama Department of Transportation WITNESS: (Legal Name of Utility) BY: Signature (Signature and Title) (Typed Name) (Typed Title) (Address) (Telephone)
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. BY: __________________________________________ CITY ENGINEER/ENGINEER-OF-RECORD BY: __________________________________________ REGION ENGINEER APPROVED: BY: __________________________________________ STATE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER DATE: (Telephone) CITY OF Gulf Shores Alabama BY:
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!