Reductions in Mitigation Sample Clauses

Reductions in Mitigation. The Permittees will not implement adaptive management changes that may result in less mitigation than provided for the Covered Species under the original terms of the SLCHCP, unless the USFWS first provides written approval. The Permittees may propose any such adaptive management changes by notice to the USFWS, specifying the adaptive management modifications proposed, the basis for them, including supporting data, and the anticipated effects on Covered Species, and other environmental impacts. Within 120 days of receiving such a notice, the USFWS will either approve the proposed adaptive management changes, approve them as modified by the USFWS, or notify the Permittees that the proposed changes constitute permit amendments that must be reviewed under Section 13.2 of this Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reductions in Mitigation. Permittee will not implement adaptive management changes that may result in less mitigation than provided for the Covered Species under the original terms of the HCP unless FWS first provides written approval. In such circumstances, Permittee may propose the adaptive management changes by notice to FWS, specifying the adaptive management modifications proposed, the basis for them, including supporting data, and the anticipated effects on the Covered Species, and other environmental impacts. Within one hundred twenty (120) days of receiving the notice, FWS will either approve the proposed adaptive management changes, approve them as modified by FWS, or notify Permittee that the proposed changes constitute permit amendments that must be processed in accordance with Chapter 7 of the HCP.
Reductions in Mitigation. The City will not implement adaptive management changes that may result in significantly less mitigation than provided for under the original terms of the HCP, unless the Services first provide written approval. Reduction of specific mitigation may be allowed if such changes maintain or increase the net biological benefits of the HCP. The City may propose any such adaptive management changes by written notice to the Services, specifying the adaptive management modifications proposed, the basis for them, including supporting data, and the anticipated effects on covered species, and impacts to other elements of the human environment. Within 135 days of receiving such a notice, the Services will either approve the proposed adaptive management changes, approve them as modified by the Services, or notify the City that the proposed changes constitute permit amendments that must be reviewed under paragraph 12.2 of this agreement.
Reductions in Mitigation. Permittee will not implement adaptive management changes that may result in less mitigation than provided for the Covered Species under the original terms of the HCP unless the Service first provides written approval. In such circumstances, Permittee may propose the adaptive management changes by notice to the Service, specifying the adaptive management modifications proposed, the basis for them, including supporting data, and the anticipated effects on the Covered Species. Within one hundred twenty (120) days of receiving the notice, the Service will either approve the proposed adaptive management changes, approve them as modified by the Service, or notify Permittee that the proposed changes constitute amendments that must be processed in accordance with Section 8.3.2 of the HCP.
Reductions in Mitigation. FIR will not implement adaptive management changes that may result in less mitigation than provided for the Covered Species under the original terms of the HCP unless the Service first provides written approval. In such circumstances, FIR may propose the adaptive management changes by notice to the Service, specifying the adaptive management modifications proposed, the basis for them, including supporting data, and the anticipated effects on the Covered Species. Within one hundred twenty (120) days of receiving the notice, the Service will either approve the proposed adaptive management changes, approve them as modified by the Service, or notify Permittee that the proposed changes constitute amendments that must be processed in accordance with Section 8.3.2 of the HCP.
Reductions in Mitigation. Permittee will not implement adaptive management changes that may result in less mitigation than provided for Covered Species under the original terms of the Plan, unless the Wildlife Agencies first provide written approval. Permittee may propose any such adaptive management changes by notice to the Wildlife Agencies, specifying the adaptive management modifications proposed, the basis for them, including supporting data, and the anticipated effects on Covered Species, and other environmental impacts. Within 120 days of receiving such notice, the Wildlife Agencies will either: (1) approve the proposed adaptive management changes, (2) approve them as modified by the Wildlife Agencies, or (3) notify Permittee that the proposed changes constitute Permit amendments that must be reviewed under Section 15.2 of this Agreement.
Reductions in Mitigation. Permittee will not implement adaptive management changes that may result in less mitigation than provided for covered species under the original terms of the HCP, unless the Service first provides written approval. Pennittee may propose any such adaptive management changes by notice to the Service, specifying the adaptive management modifications proposed, the basis for them, including suppmting data, and the anticipated effects on covered species, and other enviromnental impacts. Within 120 days of receiving such a notice, the Service will either approve the proposed adaptive management changes, approve them as modified by the Service, or notify Pennittee that the proposed changes constitute pennit amendments that must be reviewed under Section 12.2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Reductions in Mitigation

  • Monitoring of Contribution Limitations Information The Custodian shall not be responsible for monitoring the amount of contributions made to the designated beneficiary’s account or the income levels of any depositor or contributor for purposes of assuring compliance with applicable state or federal tax laws.

  • Redeployment and Redundancy 2.14.1 The parties acknowledge that the Public Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx 0000 (PSMA) and the Public Sector Management (Redeployment and Redundancy) Regulations 2014 (Regulations) provide the legislative framework for redeployment and redundancy for all Employees covered by this Agreement. If the provisions of this Agreement and the Regulations are inconsistent, the provision of the Regulations shall prevail.

  • Limitations in Tariffs A Party may, in its sole discretion, provide in its tariffs and contracts with its End Users and third parties that relate to any service, product or function provided or contemplated under this Agreement, that to the maximum extent permitted by Applicable Law, such Party shall not be liable to the End User or third Party for (i) any loss relating to or arising out of this Agreement, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, that exceeds the amount such Party would have charged that applicable person for the service, product or function that gave rise to such loss and (ii)

  • Distributions in Kind Except as expressly provided herein, no right is given to any Partner to demand and receive property other than cash. The General Partner may determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, to make a distribution in-kind to the Partners of Partnership assets, and such assets shall be distributed in such a fashion as to ensure that the fair market value is distributed and allocated in accordance with Articles 5, 6 and 10.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.