REGISTRY PROVIDER REVIEW PROCESS Sample Clauses

REGISTRY PROVIDER REVIEW PROCESS. The Public Authority shall have the right to remove an Independent Provider from the registry for just cause. If the removal is due to any of the following reasons, the Provider may only appeal the removal to the Public Authority Advisory Committee. Any such appeal to the Advisory Committee will be heard by a subcommittee and the Independent Provider may be represented by the Union. The subcommittee shall issue its decision in writing no more than thirty (30) work days after the hearing and shall send a copy to the Union if the Independent Provider is represented by the Union at the hearing. - Abuse (financial, emotional, physical, sexual, or neglect) - Theft - Misrepresentation (for example, providing false information on an application, timecard, or other document) - Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information - Being under the influence of or use or possession of alcohol or illegal substances while on duty - Absence from or leaving the job without notice - Possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon while on duty - Knowingly putting the Consumer in jeopardy - Conviction of or arrest pending trial for a crime which indicates unfitness for the job or which raises a threat to the safety or well being of the Consumer If the removal is due to other reasons, or if the Independent Provider alleges a violation of this Memorandum of Understanding, the Provider may appeal through the three-step review process described below and may be represented by the Union in this process.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to REGISTRY PROVIDER REVIEW PROCESS

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Interview Process Interviews will take place over a period of ninety (90) days. The interviews both of bargaining unit employees and of managers will be conducted jointly by Union/Industry members of the Technical Committee (or designates).

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Customer Service, Dispute Resolution If you have a question about your XOOM charges or service you may contact XOOM directly by calling 0-000-000-0000 Monday – Friday 8 (eight) a.m. to 11 (eleven)p.m.

  • FINAL BILLING SUBMISSION Unless otherwise provided by the System Agency, Grantee shall submit a reimbursement or payment request as a final close-out invoice not later than forty-five (45) calendar days following the end of the term of the Contract. Reimbursement or payment requests received after the deadline may not be paid.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Review Procedures The Parties agree to jointly conduct a review, sampling transactions of the incidents managed under this Agreement. Findings that are inconsistent with the normal or accepted way of doing business will be reconciled on a case by case basis. Any decision to further examine records will be considered on a case by case basis and appropriate follow up action agreed upon by all agencies involved. Payment for Protection Services (use if appropriate) Geographic, Statewide or Sub-Geographic (local) operating plans and procurement documents or agreement will establish billing procedures for Fee Basis Protection Services.

  • Interconnection Customer Authority Consistent with Good Utility Practice, this LGIA, and the CAISO Tariff, the Interconnection Customer may take actions or inactions with regard to the Large Generating Facility or the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities during an Emergency Condition in order to (i) preserve public health and safety, (ii) preserve the reliability of the Large Generating Facility or the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities,

  • Customer Audit Customer or its independent third party auditor reasonably acceptable to SAP (which shall not include any third party auditors who are either a competitor of SAP or not suitably qualified or independent) may audit SAP’s control environment and security practices relevant to Personal Data processed by SAP only if:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!