Regulatory Context. This HPTP has been developed to assist the BLM in their compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC 21000 - 21177), and other applicable federal, state, and/or local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies. Pursuant to 36 CFR § 800, the regulations implementing the NHPA, an MOA has been developed for OWEF Project. Stipulation III of the MOA and Mitigation Measure CUL-4 of the XXXX require the development of a Historic Property Treatment Plan (HPTP) for the project. This document is responsive to these stipulations.
Regulatory Context. 1.4 Scope of the BDCP
Regulatory Context. This HPTP has been developed to assist the BLM in their compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and other applicable federal, state, and/or local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies. Pursuant to 36 CFR § 800, the regulations implementing the NHPA, an MOA has been developed for Project. Stipulation III of the MOA and Mitigation Measure CUL-4 of the FEIS require the development of a HPTP for the project. This document is responsive to these stipulations.
Regulatory Context. The proposed Project is considered a federal undertaking4 subject to compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA of 1966, as amended, and its implementing regulations found in 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties (36 CFR 800.1[a]). Historic properties are any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, object, or traditional cultural property included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register; 36 CFR 800.16(l)(1)). In addition to Section 106, the Project is also required to adhere to other environmental and cultural resources regulatory requirements, including, but not limited to, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA), the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, the Native American Xxxxxx Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), Executive Order 11593 (Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment), the American Antiquities Act of 1906, Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites), and Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments).
Regulatory Context. The Halifax Regional Municipality Charter provides Council with a mechanism to discharge development agreements. Part VIII, Section 244 of the Charter empowers Council to discharge a development agreement, in whole or in part, in accordance with the terms of the agreement or with the concurrence of the property owner. The Charter does not require a public hearing for the discharge of an agreement or a portion thereof. A Community Council may discharge a development agreement by resolution. If the existing development agreement is discharged, future development on the subject site would be controlled by the R-1 zone standards in the Land Use By-law for Halifax Mainland.
Regulatory Context. The focus in this section is to identify the environmental and land use authorizations, permits and approvals necessary to enable the necessary works for the Donkin Underground Exploration Project. Requirements of the various levels of government for approvals, authorizations and permits are identified.
