RESTRICTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES Sample Clauses

RESTRICTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES. 1. Member Territories recognise that the following practices are incompatible with this Agreement in so far as they frustrate the benefits expected from such removal or absence of duties and quantitative restrictions as is required by this Agreement -
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RESTRICTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES. 1. Member States recognize that the following practices are incompatible with this Annex in so far as they frustrate the benefits expected from such removal or absence of duties and quantitative restrictions as is required by this Annex--
RESTRICTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES. A Contracting Party shall have freedom to adopt or continue (with or without modifications) measures that are required to check anti-competitive business practices, to the extent to which such measures are in substantial conformity with the UNCTAD Code, known as the Set of Multilaterally Agreed Equitable Principles and Rules for the Control of Restrictive Business Practices 1980, as revised from time to time. EXPLANATORY NOTE:
RESTRICTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES. [In full text] The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany, considering that restrictive business practices affecting their domestic or international trade are prejudicial to the economic and commercial interests of their countries, Convinced that action against these practices can be made more effective by the regularization of cooperation between their antitrust authorities, and Having regard, in this respect, to their Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation and to the Recommendations of the Council of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Concerning Cooperation Between Member Countries on Restrictive Business Practices Affecting International Trade adopted on October 5, 1967, and on July 3, 1973, Have agreed as follows:
RESTRICTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES. The Con- tracting Parties adopted a Decision which recognized: (a) that business practices restrict- ing competition in international trade might hamper the expansion of world trade and the economic development in individual countries and thereby frustrate the benefits of tariff re- duction and removal of quantitative restrictions; and ( b) that international co-operation was needed to deal effectively with harmful restrict- ive practices in international trade. The Deci- sion stated that consultations between Govern- ments on these matters should be encouraged, but that in present circumstances it would not be practicable for the Contracting Parties to undertake any form of control of such prac- tices nor to provide for investigation.
RESTRICTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES. At the Review Session of 1954-55, the CONTRACTING PARTIES considered and rejected a proposal to add to the General Agreement the provisions of Chapter V of the Havana Charter on cartels.33 A 1958 Resolution by the CONTRACTING PARTIES on “Restrictive Business Practices”34 appointed a Group of Experts. The 1960 Report of that Group of Experts to the CONTRACTING PARTIES on “Arrangements for Consultations” recommended that the CONTRACTING PARTIES should undertake to deal with restrictive business practices in international trade. The members of the Group agreed “that the CONTRACTING PARTIES should now be regarded as an appropriate and competent body to initiate action in this field … and should encourage direct consultations between contracting parties with a view to the elimination of the harmful effects of particular restrictive practices”.35 On 18 November 1960 the CONTRACTING PARTIES decided on arrangements for consultations concerning restrictive business practices.36 The Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Poland notes: “It was pointed out in the Working Party that the Decision by the CONTRACTING PARTIES of 18 November 1960 on arrangements for consultations between contracting parties on restrictive business practices would automatically apply in the trade between Poland and other contracting parties”.37

Related to RESTRICTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES

  • Unfair Business Practices Contractor represents and warrants that it has not been the subject of allegations of Deceptive Trade Practices violations under Chapter 17 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code, or allegations of any unfair business practice in any administrative hearing or court suit and that Contractor has not been found to be liable for such practices in such proceedings. Contractor certifies that it has no officers who have served as officers of other entities who have been the subject of allegations of Deceptive Trade Practices violations or allegations of any unfair business practices in an administrative hearing or court suit and that such officers have not been found to be liable for such practices in such proceedings.

  • Ethical Business Practices The Contractor shall work in partnership with the State to ensure a successful and valuable contract, and ethical practices are required of State employees, Contractors, and all parties representing the Contractor. All work performed under this Contract will be subject to review by the Inspector General of the State of Florida, and any findings suggesting unethical business practices may be cause for termination or cancellation.

  • Business Practices 1. Parties recognise that certain business practices of service suppliers, other than those falling under Article 14 (Monopolies and Exclusive Service Suppliers), may restrain competition and thereby restrict trade in services.

  • PROPRIETARY/RESTRICTIVE SPECIFICATIONS If a prospective bidder considers the specification contained herein to be proprietary or restrictive in nature, thus potentially resulting in reduced competition, they are urged to contact the Procurement Division prior to bid opening. Specifications which are unrelated to performance will be considered for deletion via addendum to this Invitation for Bids.

  • Restrictive Agreements The Borrower will not, and will not permit any of the Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, enter into, incur or permit to exist any agreement or other arrangement that prohibits, restricts or imposes any condition upon (a) the ability of the Borrower or any Subsidiary to create, incur or permit to exist any Lien upon any of its property or assets, or (b) the ability of any Subsidiary to pay dividends or other distributions with respect to any shares of its capital stock or to make or repay loans or advances to the Borrower or any other Subsidiary or to Guarantee Indebtedness of the Borrower or any other Subsidiary; provided that (i) the foregoing shall not apply to restrictions and conditions imposed by law or by this Agreement, (ii) the foregoing shall not apply to restrictions and conditions existing on the date hereof identified on Schedule 6.08 (but shall apply to any amendment or modification expanding the scope of, any such restriction or condition), (iii) the foregoing shall not apply to customary restrictions and conditions contained in agreements relating to the sale of a Subsidiary pending such sale, provided such restrictions and conditions apply only to the Subsidiary that is to be sold and such sale is permitted hereunder, (iv) clause (a) of the foregoing shall not apply to restrictions or conditions imposed by any agreement relating to secured Indebtedness permitted by this Agreement if such restrictions or conditions apply only to the property or assets securing such Indebtedness, (v) clause (a) of the foregoing shall not apply to customary provisions in leases and other contracts restricting the assignment thereof, (vi) the foregoing shall not apply to such restrictions and conditions applicable to any Subsidiary acquired after the date hereof if such restrictions and conditions existed at the time such Subsidiary was acquired and were not created in anticipation of such acquisition and (vii) the foregoing shall not apply to one or more Subsidiaries having any such restriction or condition so long as any such Subsidiary is not a Material Subsidiary, and each such Subsidiary together with all other such Subsidiaries in the aggregate shall not account for more than 10% of the gross revenues for the most recently ended fiscal year of the Borrower and the Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.