Result Representation Sample Clauses

Result Representation. ‌ The result of the Level 1 analysis will be available in textual and graphical form. The tex- tual form will present the collected information to the user in detail. It can be viewed at application, component, class or method level. For example at method level the result will show every method with a reference to its unique source and the connected set of permissions. On the other hand the graphical result representation of the SUMMARY and the COMPARISON mode will be limited to application and component level, because the graphical representation should be used to get an overview while all the details are provided in the textual representation. In case of the COMPARISON mode there are two possibilities:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Result Representation. ‌ In SUMMARY mode the tool will show the flow from sources to sinks. In the final result, the user can filter the flow from a specific source to a specific sink. The tool supports both textual and graphical result representation. The provided result of the COMPARISON mode is based on comparing the previous result with the latest analysis result. Similar to the SUMMARY mode, users can filter the flow details from the specific sources to specific destinations. Provision is available for the user to save the 5As mentioned by Arzt, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, le Traon, Xxxxxx and XxXxxxxx in FlowDroid: Precise Context, Flow, Field, Object-sensitive and Lifecycle-aware Taint Analysis for Android Apps; Proceed- ings of the 35th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, ACM, 2014 provided result, too. The user can also load an existing file for reviewing the previous analysis result saved in that file.
Sample 1
Result Representation. ‌ Like in Level 1 the resource usages will be assigned to five groups REQUIRED, MAYBE RE- QUIRED, UNUSED, MAYBE MISSING and MISSING. In addition, for Level 2b we will distinguish between the direct and indirect usage of resources. Therefore, we will also subdivide each group into this two categories and end up with ten groups overall. The filtering options will be the same as in Level 1. It will be possible to filter by groups and to filter out a single permission. But filtering by groups will consider all 10 groups now. Since all warning and error messages noticed in the Requirement Specification Document will be supported, the tool will give an error message if the group MISSING appears in the result. Equally the tool will give a warning message if the group UNUSED or MAYBE MISSING appears in the result. This holds for both direct and indirect resource usages. The results will be presented to the user in textual and graphical form as for previous levels depending on the chosen mode and detail level. Since this analysis is restricted to the detail levels app and component, the result representation will be restricted in the same way. The output (textual and graphical) will be equal to those shown in Figure 17 in the Requirement Specification with the option of improvements for a even better user experience. Another graphical result representation could be a visualization of the usage graph extended with edges for indirect resource usage equal to Figure 13 in the Requirement Specification Document. Both representations will be computed for all results. But the visualization of the extended usage graph is a pending feature and might not be implemented. An example for such an edge would be one between Component II of Application 2 and Permission B in Figure 4. All in all, the results can be interpreted by the user as in Level 1 but here they additionally show indirect resource usages for an App through other non-native Apps.
Sample 1

Related to Result Representation

  • Investment Representation The Holder hereby represents and covenants that (a) any share of Stock acquired upon the vesting of the Award will be acquired for investment and not with a view to the distribution thereof within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), unless such acquisition has been registered under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws; (b) any subsequent sale of any such shares shall be made either pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws, or pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act and such state securities laws; and (c) if requested by the Company, the Holder shall submit a written statement, in form satisfactory to the Company, to the effect that such representation (x) is true and correct as of the date of vesting of any shares of Stock hereunder or (y) is true and correct as of the date of any sale of any such share, as applicable. As a further condition precedent to the delivery to the Holder of any shares of Stock subject to the Award, the Holder shall comply with all regulations and requirements of any regulatory authority having control of or supervision over the issuance or delivery of the shares and, in connection therewith, shall execute any documents which the Board shall in its sole discretion deem necessary or advisable.

  • False Representation Contractor understands, acknowledges, and agrees that any false representation or any failure to comply with a representation, warranty, or certification made by Contractor is subject to all civil and criminal consequences provided at law or in equity including, but not limited to, immediate termination of this Contract.

  • Fair Representation MSEA-SEIU acknowledges its statutory responsibility to represent and handle grievances for all employees within the bargaining unit. The State shall not be responsible for actions taken or not taken by MSEA-SEIU with respect to its responsibility to provide fair representation.

  • FALSE STATEMENTS; BREACH OF REPRESENTATIONS The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement has been negotiated, and is being executed, in reliance upon the information contained in the Application, and any supplements or amendments thereto, without which the Comptroller would not have approved this Agreement and the District would not have executed this Agreement. By signature to this Agreement, the Applicant:

  • Client Representations Client represents and warrants to Consultant that;

  • Grievance Representation (A) An employee who decides to use this grievance procedure shall indicate at Step 1 (or other initial written step as authorized by the provisions of this Article) whether he shall be represented by the Union. If a grievant selects a Union Grievance Representative to represent him in a grievance which has been properly filed in accordance with this Article, the Union Grievance Representative may be allowed a reasonable amount of annual leave to investigate the grievance. Such annual leave shall be subject to prior approval by the Union Grievance Representative’s immediate supervisor; however, approval of such leave will not be withheld if the Union Grievance Representative can be allowed such time off without interfering with, or unduly hampering the operations of the unit to which the Union Grievance Representative is regularly assigned. When a grievant has elected Union representation, both the grievant and the Union Grievance Representative shall be notified of a Step 1 meeting. Written communication concerning the grievance or its resolution shall be sent to the grievant and the Union Grievance Representative, and the decision agreed to by the state and the Union shall be binding on the grievant.

  • Scope of Representation The scope of representation shall be limited to matters relating to wages, hours of employment and other terms and conditions of employment as defined in Government Code Section 3543.2. Nothing herein may be construed to limit the right of the District to consult with CSEA on any matter outside of the scope of representation.

  • UNION REPRESENTATION 3.01 For the purpose of representation with the Employer, the Union shall function and be recognized as follows:

  • Investment Representations (i) The Purchaser is acquiring the Private Placement Warrants and, upon exercise of the Private Placement Warrants, the Shares issuable upon such exercise (collectively, the “Securities”), for the Purchaser’s own account, for investment purposes only and not with a view towards, or for resale in connection with, any public sale or distribution thereof.

  • Representation by Engineer The Engineer represents that its firm has no conflict of interest that would in any way interfere with its or its employees’ performance of services for the department or which in any way conflicts with the interests of the department. The Engineer further certifies that this agreement is not barred because of a conflict of interest pursuant to Texas Government Code, Section 2261.252, between it and the State. Specifically, the Engineer certifies that none of the following individuals, nor any or their family members within the second degree of affinity or consanguinity, owns 1% or more interest, or has a financial interest as defined under Texas Government Code, Section 2261.252(b), in the Engineer: any member of the Texas Transportation Commission, TxDOT’s Executive Director, General Counsel, Chief of Procurement and Field Support Operations, Director of Procurement, or Director of Contract Services. The firm shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the department's interests.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.