Level 2b Sample Clauses

Level 2b. Inter-App Permission Analysis‌ Within Level 2b the Android App Analysis tool will support inter-App data resource usage. This is an extension to the functionality of Level 1. But in this level our tool additionally computes the resources used by an App via any sort of supported intent (explicit and implicit) without further restrictions. Hence, it covers the possibility to use data resources indirectly by calling another App’s component. For computing the data resource usages, a graph which models all possible inter-component calls via intents is computed. Moreover, this graph contains all direct resource usages of components. An example usage graph is given in Figure 4. It shows two Apps containing Application 1 Application 2 Component I Component II Component III Resources Permission A Permission B Permission C Component II Component I Communication via intent (explicit and implicit) Direct usage resource/ permission Figure 4: Example usage graph a different amount of components. The solid arrows symbolize the communication between these components through intents of any kind. On the other hand the dashed arrows reflect the direct resource usage of components. The analysis of resource usage will be done with a least fixpoint computation within the computed graph and on top of the resource usage identification of Level 1, namely the mapping of intents and system calls to permissions. Afterward we are able to classify direct and additionally indirect resource usages like in Level 1.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Level 2b. Inter-App Permission Analysis 3 SCOPE { }×{ } As required our tool will extend the two modes SUMMARY and COMPARISON with a pa- rameter of computation range, namely APP and ALL. In APP mode the tool will compute the resource usages of an App including the indirect resource usages via system Apps and other non-native Apps. The computation will be extended in ALL mode to considering all Apps of the input set as starting point. Hence, the tool will additionally detect resource usages that are provided by the considered App. Using the Cartesian Product over the two sets of modes leads to four modes overall: SUMMARY, COMPARISON APP, ALL Due to the higher complexity of the Level 2b computation and output because of the consideration of arbitrary many Apps our tool will only provide the detail levels app and component here. This will guarantee a low computation time and an output with a not too high complexity for easy understandability. To execute the Level 2b part of our tool the user has to provide at least a single .apk file. For the two SUMMARY modes additionally a set of .apk files (may be empty) is needed that build the android system environment the App to be analyzed works in. For the COMPARISON modes the user needs to provide a previously computed Android system environment in form of a usage graph persisted in a file.
Sample 1

Related to Level 2b

  • Level 2 If the grievant is not satisfied with the written answer from his/her manager the grievant may, within ten (10) days from the receipt of such answer, file a written appeal to the appointing authority. Within ten (10) days of the receipt of the written appeal the appointing authority shall investigate the grievance, which shall include a meeting with the concerned parties, and thereafter shall give a written answer to the grievant within ten (10) days.

  • Level 4 An Employee at this level performs work above and beyond the skills of an Employee at Level 3.

  • Level 1 If an Employee wishes to submit a grievance, he/she shall first discuss the complaint with his/her immediate supervisor. The Grievance Committee representative and one administrator may also be present. This discussion must occur within ten (10) days of the event causing the complaint.

  • Level IV a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the disposition of his/her grievance at Level III, he/she may file the grievance within five (5) days of the Level III response for transmittal to the Board.

  • Level I If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the supervisor shall give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after receipt of the written grievance.

  • Level II In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level I, the decision rendered may be appealed by the Union to the Superintendent of schools, provided such appeal is made in writing within (20) twenty days in person after receipt of the decision in Level I. If a grievance is properly appealed by the Union to the Superintendent, the Superintendent or designee shall set a time to meet regarding the grievance within fifteen days after receipt of the appeal. Within (20) twenty days after the meeting, the Superintendent or designee shall issue a decision in writing to the Union.

  • Level Four Arbitration

  • Level III In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level II, the decision rendered may be appealed to the School Board, provided such an appeal is made in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of the decision in Level II. If a grievance is properly appealed to the School Board, the School District shall hear the grievance within twenty (20) days after the receipt of the appeal. Within twenty (20) days after the meeting the School Board shall issue its decision in writing to the parties involved. At the option of the School Board, a committee or representative(s) of the School District may be designated by the School Board to hear the appeal at this level, and report its findings and recommendations to the School District. The School District shall then render its decision.

  • Level Five Binding Arbitration (Any grievance filed on or after July 1, 2006)

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.