Design and Implementation. A. Design Requirements
(1) The engineering design and surveys required for installation of conservation practices or measures may be provided by NRCS, a qualified vendor, or a technical service provider (TSP). Design work provided by a vendor or TSP is considered a technical assistance activity. Financial assistance funds may not be used for engineering design and survey expenses. Services may be acquired utilizing Federal contracts, contributions, and cooperative agreements.
(2) Conservation practice design and implementation will be accomplished in accordance with all NRCS policy and procedures, including applicable practice standards contained in the Field Office Technical Guide.
(3) The design must utilize conclusions from the WRP site evaluation to prescribe and specify through the use of drawings, written specifications, instructions, and related documents, the implementation requirements for all conservation practices, components, measures, and activities included in the final WRPO.
(4) Structural measures must be designed and installed such that the reach and flow of water on flood plains is not significantly altered. Structural measures will also be designed to minimize future NRCS technical and financial costs for maintenance and repair.
(5) All manageable water-control structures must be accompanied by specific operation plans including any requirements and limitations that will ensure that the hydrology restoration benefits being assigned in ranking will be fully achieved to the extent practical. Designs will contain hydrology restoration and enhancement features on the landscape that minimize the risk for mismanagement and vandalism problems and require only cost-effective, long-term management or maintenance.
(6) Where dikes and water control structures are being installed as an integral part of hydrology restoration plans, the engineering design should ensure that needed permanent and semipermanent water areas cannot be inappropriately drained during the period the area is intended to be flooded if the structure is opened or otherwise vandalized.
Design and Implementation. The Subrecipient shall be solely responsible for overseeing and/or completing the proper design and implementation of the Project approved by the RDA.
Design and Implementation. 4.1. Freshwave will design the in-building mobile Services using guidelines provided by the technology vendor(s) and in accordance with the design guidelines of the relevant Mobile Network Operator. This will be documented in the Site Design Document. The Site Design Document will be continually reviewed and amended as a living document until design approval has been granted by all the relevant Mobile Network Operator(s).
4.2. Freshwave will ensure continued adherence of the Equipment to all UK MNO and Regulator security policies.
Design and Implementation. 4.1 Freshwave will design the mobile private mobile network Services using guidelines provided by the technology vendor(s), and in accordance with spectrum regulations and licence conditions. This will be documented in the Site Design Document.
4.2 After Service Ready Date, the Site Design Document will be updated by Freshwave to be the as- built document.
4.3 Freshwave will install/manage the Services described in the Site Design Document This will include (if applicable):
a. an internet terminating router;
b. an IP switching network dedicated to the Service;
c. an active DAS digitisation and distribution system;
d. Radio Nodes, located at the correct radiating locations as per the Site Design Document;
e. any cabling;
f. an internet connection using a Backhaul Provider;
x. XXXx provisioned to allow devices to connect to the MPN;
h. devices such as Wi-Fi routers, dongles, push-to-talk handsets, etc.
i. commissioning and testing of the Equipment in preparation for Service;
j. provision of connectivity to Freshwave’s Network Operations Centre (“NOC”); and k. bringing the Services into service on the Handover Date.
4.4 Customer shall be responsible for the provision of a communications room environment in a suitable location to accommodate the Equipment, as specified in the Site Design Document.
Design and Implementation. The State must submit a draft updated evaluation design for MassHealth 1115 demonstration to CMS no later than June 30, 2018. Such revisions to the evaluation design and the STCs shall not affect previously established timelines for report submission for the insert old demo name, if applicable. The state must submit a final evaluation design within 60 days after receipt of CMS’ comments. Upon CMS approval of the evaluation design, the state must implement the evaluation design and submit their evaluation implementation progress in each of the quarterly and annual progress reports, including the rapid cycle assessments as outlined in the Monitoring Section of these STCs. The final evaluation design will be included as an attachment to the STCs. Per 42 CFR 431.424(c), the state will publish the approved evaluation design within 30 days of CMS approval. The state must implement the evaluation design and submit their evaluation implementation progress in each of the Quarterly and Annual Reports as outlined in STC 81.
Design and Implementation. Once the overall approach and strategies are determined, a more detailed operating plan needs to be developed. Operational level route and schedule planning, fare establishment, supporting facility design, training, service monitoring and assessment, and other operating elements need to be addressed. There may be off-route considerations that could facilitate the express bus service, such as feeder systems, or transit signal priority, which would require coordination with local agencies. With regard to express bus service, a significant marketing effort and public information campaign would be needed to raise awareness and promote the service. Specialized branding and coloring on the express buses are commonly employed to distinguish the service from local buses. A key component in this step is the development of a monitoring and evaluation program to ensure that the service meets the goals and objectives established for the service. Ongoing assessment and enhancement of the service is also a critical contributing factor to the success of the express bus program. Data collection and processing methods, performance measures, desired threshold values, and evaluation procedures should be established to standardize and facilitate the monitoring and evaluation effort. The transit agencies and service providers should already have procedures and guidelines in place, which should serve as the basis for the development of the monitoring and evaluation program. Considering the physical and operation features of express services in conjunction with EL facilities, commonly employed performance measures may include but are not limited to the following: • Number and percent increase in bus riders • Number of auto trips reduced • Travel time savings and reliability enhancement • On-time performance, headway adherence • System accessibility • Daily and monthly boarding, boarding/vehicle mile, boarding/vehicle hour • Annual revenue, average fare • Vehicle revenue miles, vehicle revenue hours • Operating cost/revenue mile, operating cost/boarding • Number of riders at park-and-ride lot • Safety, etc.
Design and Implementation. As discussed above, EPA’s selected NTCRA remedy for the Reach MM island involves at a minimum excavation of island sediments above the water line (approximate elevation 579 feet NAVD88) during typical low-flow conditions, followed by in situ containment capping over the excavated island area and sediments in adjacent underwater areas. The additional data collected in June 2011 which is discussed above supports an excavation to approximately 579 feet NAVD88 in addition to the extent of area where capping is required. EPA’s selected plan also includes reconstruction/restoration of island characteristics (e.g., promotion of sediment deposition and natural revegetation) to provide habitat in this area. This Work Plan summarizes the remedial design and related activities that will be performed by Dow prior to and during implementation of the remedial action. Concurrent with the development of the removal action design, which is summarized in this Work Plan, a constructability review has been conducted to verify the implementability of the remedy, considering means and methods for the removal of sediment and placement of capping materials, access, and site restoration. As discussed in Section 8, these technical design evaluations will be submitted with the Removal Action Report.
Design and Implementation. TRI CO. shall design and implement and accounting/finance system, appropriate for the scope of the IPA's operations, to provide the IPA with financial information about its business.
Design and Implementation. We agree to develop, design, finance and construct the Project(s), including, but not limited to, site acquisition, the filing of interconnection applications and procurement of an interconnection agreement with NSP, the selection and procurement of Project components, and the installation and testing of all Project components.
Design and Implementation. 4.1 Freshwave will design the mobile private network Services using guidelines provided by the technology vendor(s), and in accordance with spectrum regulations and licence conditions. This will be documented in the Site Design Document.
4.2 After Service Ready Date, the Site Design Document will be updated by Freshwave to be the as-built document
4.3 Freshwave will install/manage the Services described in the Site Design Document This will include (as applicable):
I. an internet terminating router;
II. an IP switching network dedicated to the Service;
III. an active DAS digitisation and distribution system;
IV. Radio Nodes, located at the correct radiating locations as per the Site Design Document; V. cabling;
