In summary. (a) Include the development of a transportation plan addressing at least a twenty year horizon with short and long range strategies/actions that leads to an integrated intermodal transportation system that facilitates the efficient movement of people and goods;
(b) Be reviewed and updated at least every four years;
(c) Be financially constrained;
(d) Meet air quality conformity requirements of the Clean Air Act; and
(e) Provide a minimum 30-day public comment period on plan development (draft document) and amendments.
In summary. (a) Your current basic parental leave entitlement is a period of up to 52 weeks unpaid leave;
(b) Upon return to work, following the taking of parental leave, you are entitled to return to the Position you held prior to the commencement of the leave. If that Position no longer exists, you are entitled to a Position as nearly comparable in status and TEC to the former Position as is possible.
In summary. (a) Under the Award your current sick leave entitlement (which accumulates to the Award maximum from year to year) is:
(i) In the first year of employment - 8 days
(ii) In the second year of employment - 10 days
(iii) Thereafter in each year of employment- 12 days
In summary. It is very difficult to fully understand the ins and outs of guaranteeing and being a co-borrower. Hopefully this sheet has given you an understanding of elements that may be a part of the loan support that lenders offer. For example, some lenders require you to be a part owner of the house even in guarantees or require income support even in security guarantees.
In summary a. Owner 1 and Owner 2 fell out over a boundary;
b. The Owners mediated, and came to a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement was that the mediator would select a land surveyor who would determine the boundary position. Both Owners would be bound by this determination;
c. For many reasons, Owner 2 was dissatisfied with the surveyor’s determination and refused to follow it;
d. The claim was issued by Owner 1. A preliminary issue arose, as to whether the Owners were bound by the surveyor’s determination. This would require interpretation of the settlement agreement.
In summary. 13 a. Respondent failed to inform his clinical supervisor of his conduct with Client, 14 despite receiving clinical supervision on a regular basis.
15 b. Respondent failed to document any of his outside meet-ups or 16 communications with Client. 17 18 20 21 22 23 15. 24 25
In summary. 13.1 This NJC Guidance illustrates some of the action that can be taken to overcome obstacles to learning at work and workforce development. It is clear from the case studies that much can be achieved through strengthening partnership working between trade unions and employers with benefits to all concerned. The individual's life can be enriched, inequalities tackled and untapped skills and resources accessed. At the same time the employer benefits from having a skilled and professional workforce able to perform well and deliver improved services efficiently and effectively.
13.2 Many of the Regional Employer Organisations have a long history of providing training and development and there are discussions on workforce development at Provincial Council meetings.
In summary. 2.3.1 Pūmanawa Mahi provides the opportunity for Clients and Contractors to interact and deal directly with one another to complete work.
2.3.2 Pūmanawa Mahi is not responsible for determining and evaluating the suitability of a project, Contractor, or Client.
2.3.3 When Clients and Contractors agree to enter into a Statement of Work, the Company is in no way tied to that contract or any work completed because of that Statement of Work.
2.3.4 Contractors are solely responsible for assessing the feasibility and their own ability to complete the Statement of Work to a satisfactory standard prior to bidding or accepting any work.
2.3.5 The Client is solely responsible for assessing the ability of the Contractor to complete the Statement of Work agreed to between The Parties.
2.3.6 Pūmanawa Mahi accepts no responsibility for any decisions made by
2.3.7 If a Contractor and Client decide to enter into an Agreement or complete a Statement of Work, the Statement of Work is a contractual relationship directly between the Contractor and the Client.
2.3.8 The Contractor and the Client have complete discretion both with regard to whether to enter into a Statement of Work with each other and with regard to the terms of any Service Contract.
2.3.9 You acknowledge, agree, and understand that Pūmanawa Mahi is not a party to any Statement of Work, that the formation of a Statement of Work between Clients and Contractors will not, under any circumstance, create an employment or other service relationship between Pūmanawa Mahi and any Client or Contractor or a partnership or joint venture between Pūmanawa Mahi and any Client or Contractor.
2.3.10 Pūmanawa Mahi does however reserve the right to enforce any obligations under this Agreement pursuant to Clause 14 of this Agreement.
2.3.11 Pūmanawa Mahi also reserves the right to delete, remove and/or deregister any Contractor or Client Account that Pūmanawa Mahi considers is in breach of this Agreement and/or any other term or condition associated with the use of the Site. This clause is included for the sole benefit of Pūmanawa Mahi and may be exercised without notice and any decision is final.
In summary. 3.1. In August 2015, the Claimant, Sharp Frame Investment Limited (“Sharp Frame”), invested in Ants Technology Inc. (“Cayman Subsidiary”) by way of subscription of shares issued by the Cayman Subsidiary. Those shares were exchanged for shares in the Company, pursuant to a share restructuring exercise that took place between December 2016 and December 2017.
3.2. In January 2019, Sharp Frame invested further in the Company by way of bonds issued by the Company.
3.3. The 1st Respondent, Xx Xxxxxxxx (达 声 蔚) (“Da”) and the 2nd Respondent, Xxxx Xx (宋烨) (“Song”) (Da and Song collectively as “Founders”) were the founders of the Company and held substantial shareholding in the Company through a corporate vehicle.
3.4. Sharp Frame’s investment was made with the view that there would be a listing by 2019 at the time of the Share Investment in August 2015. The expectation of a listing was later delayed to January 2021 at the time of the Claimant’s Bond Investment in January 2019. When it became clear that there was no prospect of a listing taking place, and when the Company began to default on payments under its bonds, Sharp Frame took steps to recover its investments pursuant to its contractual rights but to no avail.
3.5. To compound matters, in the course of preparing for proceedings against the Company and the Founders with respect to the recovery of its investments, Sharp Frame discovered that the Founders had, from a date presently unknown to Sharp Frame, begun to asset-strip the Company, which would appear to be the reason why the Company had been unable to repay if debts (if not the reason for the failure of the intended listing). The asset-stripping included the Founders setting up competing businesses, diversion of business opportunities, unreasonable related- party transactions, dissipation of IP rights and cessation of part of the Company’s (or its subsidiaries’) businesses without any legitimate reason.
3.6. Sharp Frame brings two separate claims. First, it seeks redemption of the shares in the Company that it had acquired and repayment of the amounts owing under the bonds which it purchased.
3.7. Second, it seeks to hold the Company, the Founders and the other Respondents liable for the breaches of contract in relation to the asset- stripping.
In summary. A vendor is required to maintain a minimum of fifteen participants to be eligible for authorized vendor status. Providers and their agents access to Portland Public Schools’ employees is limited to before and after normal working hours, and locations outside of the workplace. Employees, however, may initiate contact with a vendor or agent during personal breaks, such as lunch. Providers and their agents are reminded that violation of the solicitation rules will first result in a written warning from Portland Public Schools; and if continued, could result in loss of the right to enroll new participants in the 403(b) program.
