Results Analysis Sample Clauses

Results Analysis. The contractor shall undertake analysis of the telephone surveys in schools and colleges. The contractor will ensure the analysis will: • Compare aspiration raising activities in schools/colleges of different characteristics (region, proportion of FSM eligible pupils, size of schools, distance to Xxxxxxx Group universities). • Compare aspiration-raising activities in the booster sample of 100 schools who send a high proportion of high-achieving disadvantaged pupils to HE with the national school sample. • Identify any trends in what strategies work for different pupil groups. • Assess any association in practices with good/ not so good results, and in particular identify activities related to increased numbers of high-achieving disadvantaged pupils going onto to HE. Achievement will be measured by the inclusion of the analysis in the interim report in Mid January 2013 The contractor shall undertake analysis of the case studies in schools and colleges. The contractor will ensure the analysis will: • Include within-case and cross case analysis • Identify recurrent themes, and commonalities and differences between schools and colleges of different characteristics • Identify best practice, including what works for which groups. Data triangulation • The data will be triangulated across the tasks 3,4 and 5. • Comparisons will be made between the findings in schools, FE colleges and sixth forms Achievement will be measured by inclusion of the case studies in the first draft of the final report by Mid April 2013
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Results Analysis. The contractor will provide analysis on to what extent schools and colleges are providing aspiration raising activities to high achieving disadvantaged pupils. What activities take place across different year groups. The contractor will provide the analysis by school characteristics including region, school size, distance to the nearest Xxxxxxx group university, proportion of FSM eligible pupils and compare the boost sample with the overall school sample. The contractor will identify if activities are associated with higher numbers of pupils progressing to HE and trends in what works for different pupil groups. The data from the different strands will be triangulated and the analysis will highlight what ‘best practice’ looks like. Comparisons between schools and colleges will be made.
Results Analysis. In this section, I present the simulated scenario parameters and simulation results for the proposed link-adaptive coordinated packet scheduler in the DL of an LTE system under the altered PF priority with full frequency reuse. Table 3.2 details a comprehensive list for the simulation parameters used. Our algorithm’s performance is compared to three other schemes. Figure
Results Analysis 

Related to Results Analysis

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Narrative Commentary covering site improvements, circulation, organization of building space in relation to program requirements, building materials, special features, building systems (HVAC, plumbing, fire protection, structural, security, and video voice and data).

  • Analysis LICENSEE represents and agrees that it will only incorporate Components received from authorized suppliers into Licensed Products and for no other purpose, and that LICENSEE will not directly or indirectly attempt to reverse-engineer any material provided to it hereunder by LICENSEE or any supplier of any Component.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!