Review and Procurement Process Sample Clauses

Review and Procurement Process. (a) Where section 20.3(b) does not apply or where the agreements contemplated in section 20.3(b) have not been reached, the Government’s review and procurement process which is attached hereto as Appendix I will be used for the procurement of physician services to be provided under Service Contracts, excluding renewals of Service Contracts. (b) The system for ranking proposals referred to in Appendix I will be developed jointly by the BCMA and the Government, and will be based on the criteria listed in section 1.6, of Appendix I. Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, Q.C. will act as conciliator in this process and if, by January 31, 2008, the parties are unable to agree upon the values attributable to each criteria, Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, Q.C. will resolve the outstanding issues and the resulting system for ranking proposals will thereafter be used for the purposes of Appendix I. (c) If the Government amends its general procurement policies in a manner that renders null and void or materially alters the process set out in Appendix I, the BCMA and Government will negotiate mutually agreeable provision(s) to be substituted for the provision(s) that have been rendered null and void or materially altered by the change in Government procurement policy. If the Government and the BCMA are unable to reach agreement on replacement provisions either party may submit the matter to Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, Q.C. to adjudicate the differences under the Commercial Arbitration Act. (d) The Government and the BCMA may, by written agreement, amend the criteria referred to in section 1.6 of Appendix I with corresponding amendments to the point system for ranking proposals developed under this section. (e) The increased annual funding for the Alternative Payments Program referred to in section 10.1 of the Specialists Subsidiary Agreement, including any such funding that remains unallocated from a prior year, is available to fund Service Contracts procured through Appendix I. In addition, the parties may agree to amend this Agreement and/or any of the Physician Master Subsidiary Agreements, in the manner contemplated in section 1.7 of this Agreement or the corresponding section of the relevant Physician Master Subsidiary Agreement, in order to reallocate other funds already committed by the Government pursuant to this Agreement or any of the Physician Master Subsidiary Agreements so as to make such funds available to fund Service Contracts procured through Appendix I.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Review and Procurement Process

  • Procurement procedures 11.1 The Recipient must secure the best value for money and shall act in a fair, open and non-discriminatory manner in all purchases of goods and services.

  • Equipment Procurement If responsibility for construction of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades is to be borne by the Connecting Transmission Owner, then the Connecting Transmission Owner shall commence design of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades and procure necessary equipment as soon as practicable after all of the following conditions are satisfied, unless the Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner otherwise agree in writing: 5.5.1 NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner have completed the Interconnection Facilities Study pursuant to the Interconnection Facilities Study Agreement; 5.5.2 The NYISO has completed the required cost allocation analyses, and Developer has accepted his share of the costs for necessary System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S of the NYISO OATT; 5.5.3 The Connecting Transmission Owner has received written authorization to proceed with design and procurement from the Developer by the date specified in Appendix B hereto; and 5.5.4 The Developer has provided security to the Connecting Transmission Owner in accordance with Article 11.5 by the dates specified in Appendix B hereto.

  • Other Procurement Procedures National Competitive Bidding

  • Review Systems The Asset Representations Reviewer will maintain and utilize an electronic case management system to manage the Tests and provide systematic control over each step in the Review process and ensure consistency and repeatability among the Tests.

  • Timescale It is recognised that discussions around actual salary increases have a dependency on top level Company decisions. However, it is agreed that more general discussions can start before this point, these will include: The Company providing the latest pay and benefit guidelines/comparators (if updated) By end of January Identify and attempt to agree deviations from information detailed in appendix 4. By 16th March The Company providing information as detailed in Appendix 4 (snapshot as of 1st April) (incorporating any agreed deviations from the standard list) By 10th April Joint team produce cost-model ready for negotiations By end of April Unite Submit and present to the Company negotiating team their annual pay claim By end of April Line Managers completing Appraisals (including Company checking of employees who don’t have a PAC) January – March where possible By end of April in all cases Company provides remainder of appraisal PAC information By 7th May Negotiate non-budget related matters By end May Once the Company decisions referred to above have been made, the pay negotiations can further progress. Steps will be taken earlier where practicable. Stage 1 negotiations Offer voted on by 14th June If required stage 2 negotiations Offer voted on by 30th June If required stage 3 negotiations Offer voted on by 14 th July Guidelines issued to line managers (following discussions between Unite & the Company) By 22nd July Pay planning complete By end July Pay review effective 1st August Company provides UNITE with information, snapshot at 1st August By 10th August Notification of pay review to individuals by managers Before August pay date At the start of the process, UNITE and the company will jointly review the timetable and agree any variations that are required.

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • Project Implementation The Borrower shall:

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!