Selection of Performance Targets Sample Clauses

Selection of Performance Targets. 1. MassDOT shall set statewide performance targets in coordination with MPOs and public transportation operators, as required by 23 CFR Part 450. Coordination may include discussion at the established Performance Measures Subcommittee, as well as other in‐person meetings, conference calls, web meetings, and/or email communication. When statewide targets are in final draft, MassDOT will provide applicable targets to each MPO board for consultation before final statewide targets are adopted. 2. Public transportation operators, as applicable, shall set performance targets to meet the federal performance management requirements for transit asset management and transit safety for incorporation into certification document updates. a. Transit operators shall provide notice to the MassDOT Rail and Transit Division, the MassDOT Office of Transportation Planning, and the relevant MPO(s) within their service area when targets are set. b. The MPO must adopt regional targets for its metropolitan planning area that should, at a minimum, reflect any transit agencies whose funds are programmed in its TIP. The MPO may choose to include more agencies that operate within its region as it develops its targets, and any necessary data sharing that is required to achieve that should be coordinated and documented locally. 3. For the TPM measures established by FHWA, each MPO shall set performance targets within 180 days of MassDOT setting targets by either supporting MassDOT targets, or setting separate targets of their choosing for the MPO region. With respect to transit targets, to the maximum extent practicable, each MPO shall reassess performance targets for the relevant transit providers each time their Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) is developed, through consultation with the MPO boards. As part of this process, RTAs shall provide the relevant MPO(s) with the current set of performance targets and any necessary supporting data. With respect to the timing of formal transit target setting, per Article 1.5, RTAs developing their own TAM Plan shall reassess performance targets at least once every four years. a. MPOs shall include in their Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) a narrative that outlines the performance measure setting process and highlight investments that will contribute toward achievement of the applicable targets. b. MassDOT shall include in its State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) a narrative t...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Selection of Performance Targets a. The Iowa DOT will develop draft statewide performance targets in coordination with MPOs. Coordination may include in-person meetings, web meetings, conference calls, and/or email communication. MPOs shall be given an opportunity to provide comments on statewide targets before final statewide targets are adopted. b. If an MPO chooses to adopt their own target for any measure, they will develop draft MPO performance targets in coordination with the Iowa DOT. Coordination methods will be at the discretion of the MPO, but the Iowa DOT shall be provided an opportunity to provide comments on draft MPO performance targets prior to final approval.
Sample 1
Selection of Performance Targets. The CCRPC, VTrans, and GMT will coordinate, as applicable, in developing performance targets for each of the FAST Act measures as required by 23 CFR Parts 490, as well as 49 CFR 625 and 49 CFR 673 and as outlined below. The schedule to establish targets varies by measure. Generally, once VTrans and GMT set performance targets for the various measures then the CCRPC has 180 days, or the date specified by federal code, to either establish their own targets for the metropolitan planning area or endorse the established targets and agree to plan and program projects so that they contribute toward the achievement of these targets. • VTrans will present data collected for each highway performance measure and collaborate with the CCRPC and GMT (as appropriate) in the setting of targets. • VTrans will provide the CCRPC and GMT a minimum of 30 days to give feedback on the data and assumptions provided. VTrans will set statewide highway targets taking into consideration feedback from the CCRPC and GMT (where applicable). • GMT will present data collected for each transit performance measure and collaborate with the CCRPC in setting targets. • GMT will provide the CCRPC a minimum of 30 days to give feedback on the data and assumptions provided. GMT will set transit targets taking into consideration feedback from the CCRPC. • If the CCRPC chooses to adopt their own targets for any FHWA or FTA measure, they will develop performance targets for the metropolitan planning area in coordination with VTrans or GMT. Coordination methods will be at the discretion of the CCRPC, but VTrans and GMT will be given an opportunity to provide comments on the draft MPO performance targets prior to final approval.
Sample 1
Selection of Performance Targets. MoDOT will drah statewide performance targets for each of the federal performance measures and coordinate with MPOs and public transportation agencies, as required by 23 CFR Parts 450 and 771, as well as 49 CFR Part 613. Coordination may include in-person meetings, conference calls, web meetings, and/or email communication. MPOs and public transportation agencies participating in the MoDOT TAM Plan will be given an opportunity to comment on the MoDOT statewide targets before they are established.
Sample 1
Selection of Performance Targets a. MoDOT will draft statewide performance targets for each of the federal performance measures and coordinate with MPOs and public transportation agencies, as required by 23 CFR Parts 450 and 771, as well as 49 CFR Part 613. Coordination may include in‐person meetings, conference calls, web meetings, and/or email communication. MPOs and public transportation agencies participating in the MoDOT TAM Plan will be given an opportunity to comment on the MoDOT statewide targets before they are established. b. MPOs will coordinate with MoDOT and/or the public transportation agencies when establishing MPO targets or supporting state targets. Coordination may include in‐person meetings, conference calls, web meetings, and/or email communication. MoDOT and public transportation agencies will be given an opportunity to comment on the MPO targets. MPOs will establish performance targets by board action, or as designated by the board. c. Public transportation agencies and MPOs creating their own TAM Plan and/or PTASP will coordinate with their respective MPO and MoDOT when establishing transit targets. Coordination may include in‐person meetings, conference calls, web meetings, and/or email communication. MoDOT and the respective MPO will be given an opportunity to comment on the transit targets before they are established. MPOs and public transportation agencies will establish transit performance targets by board action, or as designated by the board.
Sample 1

Related to Selection of Performance Targets

  • Covenants of Performance Measurement No interference. Registry Operator shall not interfere with measurement Probes, including any form of preferential treatment of the requests for the monitored services. Registry Operator shall respond to the measurement tests described in this Specification as it would to any other request from an Internet user (for DNS and RDDS) or registrar (for EPP). ICANN testing registrar. Registry Operator agrees that ICANN will have a testing registrar used for purposes of measuring the SLRs described above. Registry Operator agrees to not provide any differentiated treatment for the testing registrar other than no billing of the transactions. ICANN shall not use the registrar for registering domain names (or other registry objects) for itself or others, except for the purposes of verifying contractual compliance with the conditions described in this Agreement. PUBLIC INTEREST COMMITMENTS Registry Operator will use only ICANN accredited registrars that are party to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 27 June 2013 in registering domain names. A list of such registrars shall be maintained by ICANN on ICANN’s website. (Intentionally omitted. Registry Operator has not included commitments, statements of intent or business plans provided for in its application to ICANN for the TLD.) Registry Operator agrees to perform the following specific public interest commitments, which commitments shall be enforceable by ICANN and through the Public Interest Commitment Dispute Resolution Process established by ICANN (posted at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/resources/registries/picdrp), which may be revised in immaterial respects by ICANN from time to time (the “PICDRP”). Registry Operator shall comply with the PICDRP. Registry Operator agrees to implement and adhere to any remedies ICANN imposes (which may include any reasonable remedy, including for the avoidance of doubt, the termination of the Registry Agreement pursuant to Section 4.3(e) of the Agreement) following a determination by any PICDRP panel and to be bound by any such determination. Registry Operator will include a provision in its Registry-Registrar Agreement that requires Registrars to include in their Registration Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name Holders from distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, phishing, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or deceptive practices, counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity contrary to applicable law, and providing (consistent with applicable law and any related procedures) consequences for such activities including suspension of the domain name. Registry Operator will periodically conduct a technical analysis to assess whether domains in the TLD are being used to perpetrate security threats, such as pharming, phishing, malware, and botnets. Registry Operator will maintain statistical reports on the number of security threats identified and the actions taken as a result of the periodic security checks. Registry Operator will maintain these reports for the term of the Agreement unless a shorter period is required by law or approved by ICANN, and will provide them to ICANN upon request. Registry Operator will operate the TLD in a transparent manner consistent with general principles of openness and non-discrimination by establishing, publishing and adhering to clear registration policies.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6. (b) If the Operator does not comply with the Operator Performance Level then the Access Holder must pay to QR Network the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 as part of the invoice issued by QR Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following QR Network becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, the Operator must pay such amount to QR Network within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from QR Network. (c) If QR Network does not comply with the QR Network Performance Level then QR Network will credit to the Access Holder the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 by way of a deduction from the invoice issued by QR Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following the Access Holder becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, QR Network must pay such amount to the Access Holder within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from the Access Holder. (d) The Parties must, if requested by either Party, meet to review the Performance Levels subject to such review not occurring within six (6) Months after the Commitment Date or any previous review of the Performance Levels. If either Party notifies the other that it considers that the Performance Levels are no longer appropriate, the Parties may agree on varied Performance Levels and any associated variations to the Agreement including the Base Access Charges and the Train Service Description. If the Parties are unable to agree to such variations, then the existing Performance Levels shall continue to apply unless varied by QR Network in accordance with the provisions of Clause 5.6(e). (e) In the event that the Access Holder and/or the Operator (i) does not comply in any material respect with the Train Service Description; and (ii) the Access Holder fails to demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of QR Network when requested to do so, that the Access Holder will consistently comply with the Train Service Description for the remainder of the Term then, following consultation with the Access Holder, QR Network will be entitled to: (iii) vary the Train Service Description to a level it reasonably expects to be achievable by the Access Holder for the remainder of the Term having regard to the extent of previous compliance with the Train Service Description (ignoring, for the purpose of assessing previous compliance, any non-compliance to the extent that the non-compliance was attributable to a Railway Operator (other than the Access Holder) or to QR Network); and (iv) vary the Agreement (including, without limitation, the Operator Performance Level and the Base Access Charges) to reflect the impact of the change in the Train Service Description. (f) The Access Holder shall be entitled to dispute any variation proposed by QR Network pursuant to Clause 5.6(e) and such dispute will be referred to an expert for resolution in accordance with Clause 17.3.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Performance Goal (a) Subject to the following sentence, the Performance Goal is set out in Appendix A hereto, which Appendix A is incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of Section 13 or any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Committee reserves the right to unilaterally change or otherwise modify the Performance Goal in any manner whatsoever (including substituting a new Performance Goal). If the Committee exercises such discretionary authority to any extent, the Committee shall provide the Grantee with a new Appendix A in substitution for the Appendix A attached hereto, and such new Appendix A and the Performance Goal set out therein (rather than the Appendix A attached hereto and the Performance Goal set out therein) shall in all events apply for all purposes of this Agreement. (b) Depending upon the extent, if any, to which the Performance Goal has been achieved, and subject to compliance with the requirements of Section 4, each PSU shall entitle the Grantee to receive, at such time as is determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 5, between 0 and 2.0 Shares for each PSU. The Committee shall, as soon as practicable following the last day of the Performance Period, certify (i) the extent, if any, to which, in accordance with Appendix A, the Performance Goal has been achieved with respect to the Performance Period and (ii) the number of whole and/or partial Shares, if any, which, subject to compliance with the vesting requirements of Section 4, the Grantee shall be entitled to receive with respect to each PSU (with such number of whole and/or partial Shares being hereafter referred to as the “Share Delivery Factor”). Such certification shall be final, conclusive and binding on the Grantee, and on all other persons, to the maximum extent permitted by law.

  • Performance Schedule The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance.

  • Prohibition of Performance Requirements 1. The provisions of the Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures in Annex 1A to the WTO Agreement (TRIMs), which are not specifically mentioned in or modified by this Agreement, shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to this Agreement. 2. Member States shall undertake joint assessment on performance requirements no later than 2 years from the date of entry into force of this Agreement. The aim of such assessment shall include reviewing existing performance requirements and considering the need for additional commitments under this Article.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!