Shadows. Any shifts not filled due to the temporary absence of a full-time employee will be assigned to that employee’s shadow.
Shadows. Section 295 of the Planning Code restricts the construction of any structure over 40’-0” that will cast any shade or shadow upon any property under the jurisdiction of, or designated for acquisition by, the Recreation and Park Commission, except upon prior action of the City Planning Commission. On September 23, 2009, the Project Sponsor submitted a request for Section 295 review of the Cathedral Hill Campus Hospital and MOB; both buildings exceed 40 feet in height (Case No. 2009.0885K). Department staff prepared a shadow fan depicting the potential shadows cast by the buildings and concluded that neither building would have a potential impact on properties subject to
Shadows. It is nearly impossible to obtain ortho imagery without the shadows of buildings or cliffs. However, if the digital imagery is processed correctly, it should have acceptable detail in shadow and bright areas. If a seam line runs through a shadow, the shadow may change position or stop at the seam line. This may draw attention to the shadow, but is not grounds for rejection of data. Xxxxxxx does not route seamlines around specific shadows to allow for ground features to come from the “best” image. Xxxxxxx does route seamlines to avoid buildings and ground features Typical features that can be seen in the imagery are sidewalks, painted lines on the street, cars, houses, swimming pools outlines, porches, outdoor furniture, etc. There are instances when a shadow will be cast on areas that essentially will lack detail. Features such as grass, bushes, water, black automobiles or other very dark colored features will not be very distinguishable in shadows. Features like this are not grounds for rejection. Acceptable shadow detail.
Shadows. 1. As set forth in the FEIS and LOR, prior to the time when the Project casts shadows on the stained glass windows of the Church of the Redeemer (the “Church”), FCRC shall develop and implement measures to offset the impacts of the shadows comprised of: (i) removing the existing protective coverings from all of the stained glass windows, including any patching and repair associated with the removal;
Shadows shadows constitute a major problem for all outdoor, and to a lesser extent indoor classification tasks. Shadows change the size of the tracked object and add extra regions to classify, which in fact hold little usable data. Shadows are also hard to suppress, as they do not hold a uniform shape or size. Efforts are being made within the AVITRACK project to minimise these problems. Occlusion – when an object passes in front of any tracked object, the tracked object is said to be occluded. The occluding object may be stationary or in motion, and may take any form. When this occurs, the overall appearance of the tracked object changes in very unpredictable ways. This problem can be minimised through the recognition of subsections of the image to be classified instead of the image as a whole. Image Transformations – this concerns translation and rotations to the image. Images can differ greatly dependant on the rotation and position within the objects bounding box. The global position of the object is resolved by the current implementation of the system, however, the objects bounding box returned by the system may only have part of the object – in the case of an object entering the scene – and may present the object at any rotation. Availability of Exemplar Objects – it is often difficult to find objects, which exemplify their respective class, especially within object classes that can deform, for example people, articulated vehicles and vehicles with external moving parts. The objects are also, as mentioned above, often misstracked or the bounding boxes contain large amounts of unwanted background pixels.
Shadows. Section 295 of the Planning Code restricts the construction of any structure over 40’-0” that will cast any shade or shadow upon any property under the jurisdiction of, or designated for acquisition by, the Recreation and Park Commission, except upon prior action of the City Planning Commission. On April 7, 2010, the Project Sponsor submitted a request for Section 295 review of the St. Luke's Campus Hospital and St. Luke's Campus MOB buildings; both buildings exceed 40 feet in height (Case No. 2009.0886K). Department staff prepared a shadow fan depicting the potential shadows cast by the buildings and concluded that neither the St. Luke's Campus Hospital nor the St. Luke's Campus MOB would have a potential impact on properties subject to Section 295. Staff updated the shadow fan analysis to reflect the 142' MOB building, and confirmed that the revised St. Luke's Campus Hospital building would not impact properties subject to Section 295.
